Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
January 19, 2015
[Note: Shortly after the recent terrorist attacks in Paris, I thought the Power Elite (PE) might use these to implement a global type of post-9/11 "Homeland Security Act" mentality. Prior to the recent attacks, European leaders were resentful of the NSA's (National Security Agency) spying on them (e.g., monitoring phone calls). But sure enough, on January 8, THE GUARDIAN published an article, "MI5 chief seeks new powers after Paris magazine attack," which begins with "The head of MI5, Andrew Parker, has called for new powers to help fight Islamist extremism, warning of a dangerous imbalance between increasing numbers of terrorist plots against the UK and a drop in the capabilities of intelligence services to snoop on communications." Remember what Osama bin Laden said shortly after the 9-11 attacks. He foretold that the people (especially Americans) will lose their freedoms! Isn't that what has been happening, and even more loses of freedom are to come.
Just a few days ago, the Belgian police raided a number of terrorist cells and confiscated many weapons and police uniforms held by the terrorists. Isn't this all just a little bit suspicious? Aren't these ISIS, al Qaeda, etc. terrorists supposed to be somewhat intelligent? So why are they targeting police, probably the group best able to combat them? Europe functions based upon its rail and road systems. Interrupt them, and you have destroyed Europe. So why haven't the terrorists done this? It is extremely simple. It seems like just about every Iraqi in the Iraq War with the U.S. could make IED"s (Improvised Explosive Device) and remotely detonate them. So why have not the terrorists not done this at strategically important points in Europe's rail system (causing thousands of casualties) and highway system (e.g., at bridges, bringing vehicular traffic and commerce to a halt)? European authorities cannot possibly monitor and protect day and night all of the thousands of miles of rails and highways across Europe, so the terrorists are practically guaranteed they will not be caught if IED detonations are remotely controlled. So isn't it suspicious that this has not occurred already?!]
As an example of how the press/media are controlled today, I told Jim to look at the case of Egypt. I said, "Jim, do you remember just a few years ago when the press/media were constantly publicizing the protests against the authoritarian Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and calling for democratic reform? Well, Jim, where is that press/media now when the authoritarian General Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil el-Sisi took over Egypt in a military coup?" Jim responded, "Yeah, you are right! Where are they?" I said, "Their controllers, the Power Elite (PE), through carefully selected editors, have assigned them to cover other news instead."
Jim was impressed with my information concerning the press/media's control by the PE, and he requested the same type of evidence concerning the other 3 areas (politics, economics and education) Cecil Rhodes desired to control. I explained to him that the Rhodes network worked with a number of other groups like Skull & Bones (S&B), and that in the late 1800s S&B member William Whitney (and his son) developed a strategy to contribute heavily to both major political parties and alternate power so that the public believed they had choice in voting when they really did not. This is why for many decades (about 65 years), neither the Democrat nor Republican parties has occupied the presidency for 2 back-to-back 8-year terms. George H.W. Bush (whom David Rockefeller said was "one of us") was not re-elected in 1992 after succeeding Ronald Reagan in 1988.
Jim then commented, "I understand all that, but most of what you have told me involves the past. For your theory to work, you have to demonstrate predictability. In other words, have you, based upon your theory of PE control and manipulation, been able to predict events?" Jim had raised a legitimate point, and so told him that while many pundits had said President Obama would not be re-elected in 2012, I said that according to the PE plan, he would be re-elected, and I was proven correct. I next told him that according to the planned alternation of power, the next president elected in November 2016 would be a Republican (probably Jeb Bush), who would be narrowly re-elected in 2020 (probably due to an "October surprise"), and that person would be followed by a Democrat in November 2024 (probably a woman) because Alice Bailey in 1933 said the World Federation of Nations would be "taking rapid shape" in 2025.
Regarding predictability in economics, I told Jim that in the January 9, 1988 edition of THE ECONOMIST, they predicted that a world currency called the Phoenix would appear in 2018. Supporting this, I told Jim to look at the October 6, 2009 edition of THE INDEPENDENT in which Robert Fisk wrote "The Demise of the Dollar," and referred to "secret meetings (that) have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme (to have a basket of currencies for oil), which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars....Chinese financial sources believe President Barack Obama is too busy fixing the U.S. economy to concentrate on the extraordinary implications of the transition from the dollar in nine years' time. The current deadline for the currency transition is 2018."
Similarly the next year, on September 1, 2010, Dr. Alessandro Sassoli was interviewed by COIN UPDATE regarding his idea beginning in 1996 for a new global currency, a project of the United Future World Currency (UFWO) organization. And in this interview, he stated: "The world is evolving very fast. Maybe in just eight years time, it might be possible to introduce a new super-national currency like the UFWC by 2018."
� 2015 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved