NewsWithViews on Pinterest NewsWithViews on Google+

Additional Titles







The Nazis' "Other" Culture







Grants Pass




By Servando Gonzalez
January 14, 2014

During the San Fermín festival in Pamplona, Spain, a few fighting bulls are set out free to run along the streets of the old city quarter on their way to the bull ring. As it has become a tradition since 1924, a group of daredevils run in front of the bulls. As their only protection, the runners are allowed to carry several rolled-up newspapers to fend off the bulls. If one of the bulls comes too close to a runner, he throws a newspaper in another direction, and the bull follows the newspaper instead of the runner.

Nothing better to illustrate this diversionary technique than the anthropogenic (human caused) global warming “theory.”

Global cooling,[1] acid rain, the ozone hole, the greenhouse effect, and now global warming (later conveniently changed into “climate change”), have been the rolled-up newspapers thrown past the people’s eyes to divert them from the true cause of the problem. Once a “scientific” theory is discredited, they create another bogus one out of the blue as a new rolled-up newspaper to throw past the eyes of the American people to divert their attention from the true source of the problem.

So, the same people who were thirty years ago predicting a catastrophic global cooling are now crying wolf about an imminent global warming. Now, bringing scientific facts to show the “errors” of the supporters of global warming would be virtually the same as acting like a bull following the rolled-up newspaper, because global warming has absolutely nothing to do with science but with intelligence and espionage. Therefore, I will not delve into scientific facts but limit myself to the field of intelligence and psychological warfare.

In his ancient treatise The Art of War, Sun Tzu states that all warfare is based on deception. In the case of psychological warfare operations, they are not simply based on deception; they are deception.

The human-caused global warming campaign has nothing to do with science but with pseudo-science. It is actually a psychological warfare operation waged against the peoples of the world. Its goal is to convince the people to voluntarily accept the lowering of their standards of living to pre-industrial levels of consumption and willingly become medieval serfs for the NWO masters. Key in this PSYWAR is the way the conspirators’-controlled globalwarmers have implanted in the mind of a large majority of the people in the world the idea that an inert gas, vital in the maintenance of life in this planet, is actually a dangerous, poisonous pollutant.


I remember an illustration in my high school biology textbook back in Cuba depicting the carbon cycle, also called the life cycle. On the left, the illustration showed humans and animals inhaling oxygen and exhaling carbon dioxide, and on the right there were trees and other plants inhaling carbon dioxide and exhaling oxygen. The graphic illustrated the process by which carbon compounds are interconverted in the environment, mainly involving the incorporation of carbon dioxide into living tissue by photosynthesis and are returned to the atmosphere through respiration, the decay of dead organisms, and the burning of fuels.

In this process CO2 remains as a trace gas because photosynthesis converts it to O2 (Oxygen) almost immediately. In order to sustain life in this planet, we need mega-tons of CO2 to be put daily into our atmosphere to grow our food. The world’s food supply depends on the CO2 emissions of SUVs, volcanoes, fires, plant-rot and termites — a major source of CO2— to supply this essential greenhouse gas at sufficient levels to ward off famine.

The fact is that, despite the prevailing “consensus” among “prestigious scientists,” carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and it is not harmful to humans. On the contrary, it is a colorless, non-toxic gas and a valuable plant food. Actually, CO2 is the friendliest gas in our atmosphere. A warm climate with abundant carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would be beneficial for all types of life on planet earth — no wonder the globalist conspirators hate it so much.[2]

Currently, the concentration level of carbon dioxide in the world’s atmosphere is at 385 parts per million —greenhouses require 4 to 5 times that level to get good green plant production. In order to be harmful to humans it would need to be no less than 6,000 ppm. Actually, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does not control climate and the minimal effect of man’s CO2 emissions is wholly beneficial.

Many easily verifiable facts deny the claim that CO2 is a poisonous gas. For example, the average level of carbon dioxide in nuclear submarines after several days of constant immersion is known to rise as high as 4,000 parts per million. But, as retired Army meteorologist Gunnar C. Carlson has pointed out, despite of this high level of CO2, no crew has ever been poisoned by carbon dioxide in nuclear submarines.[3]

British Fabian Bertrand Russell wrote that with the adequate brainwashing techniques the social psychologists of the future would be able to implant in the minds of school children the unshakable conviction that snow is black.[4]

The fact that most young Americans currently believe that CO2 is a poisonous gas proves that Russell was right.

Another indication that global warming is actually brainwashing as the result of a psychological warfare operation is the conspirators’ use of semantic deception. This is evidenced in newly coined phrases like “carbon footprint,” “carbon emissions,” “carbon tax,” “carbon offsets,” “carbon allowances,” and the like. In the conspirator’s disingenuous lingo, carbon stands for CO2, that is, carbon dioxide.

But carbon dioxide, CO2, is not “carbon,” the same way that water, H2O, is not “hydrogen” and table salt, NaCl, is not “sodium.” Though carbon is one of the two molecules present in CO2 —a combination of one carbon molecules and two oxygen molecules—, carbon dioxide is a totally different thing: an inert gas that has nothing to do with carbon or oxygen.

Yet, by using the word “carbon” as a synonym for “carbon dioxide,” and repeating it over and over until it was firmly implanted in the people’s minds, the brainwashing conspirators have subliminally turned an inert, useful gas into a pollutant. The word “carbon,” comes from the Latin carbo, carbon, meaning ‘coal, charcoal.’ Coal and charcoal are black, dirty substances linked in the people’s minds to pollution. Consequently, if “carbon dioxide” is actually “carbon,” it by force must be a dirty, poisonous, dangerous pollutant.

Nothing, however, could be further from the truth. Humans exhale carbon dioxide that plants breath and eventually exhale, but only after transforming it into oxygen which humans breath. Both carbon dioxide and oxygen are basic elements of life in this planet. But, through years of constant brainwashing, the conspirators have changed CO2, a gas of life, into a gas of death.

Some pseudo-conservative critics of Obama, who call him a Communist despite his close links to Wall Street bankers, affirm that his secret goal is wealth redistribution, that is, taking the wealth from the U.S. and other rich countries and redistributing it among poor countries. This is pure nonsense. The true purpose of the CFR conspirators who control Obama is not redistributing wealth, but destroying other people’s wealth, particularly middle-class wealth. They don’t want to raise the economic level of third world countries at the expense of lowering the economic level of the developed ones, but to lower the economic level of the developed countries to the level of the poor ones.[5]

What they have in mind is not equality in wealth, but in poverty and misery. Why? Because once we become dirty poor and live on pre-industrial levels of consumption without reproducing beyond the enforced preset levels, we will not consume the earth’s resources that rightfully belong to them —our all-powerful masters and their large families. And you bet that they would take care that all the international laws they are pushing would contain exceptions for them —like the possibility of buying carbon offsets.

Actually, while they are conspiring behind our backs to turn the rest of us into medieval serfs, the self-appointed masters of the world are showing the how they are already living in post-industrial levels of hyper-consumption. Despite their claims on the contrary, they have no plans to stop flying in their private jets, sailing in their multi-million dollar yachts, riding in their flashy limos, devouring caviar wedges and drinking plenty of champagne.

The Rockies’ Love for Eugenics

One of the two main phobias that have haunted the Rockefeller family for many years are the fear of losing their fortune —one of the Rockefeller sisters, Winifred, feared so much losing her fortune and living in poverty that she committed suicide in 1951 at her home in Deer Park, Greenwich, Connecticut, after killing her two daughters. The other is the fear that the growing masses of population would deprive them of the natural resources of the planet that, by birthright, belong to them and their billionaire friends. But, since the 1950s, when the fear of losing their fortune became a more remote possibility, the fear of growing population levels became their first concern, to the point of turning into an obsession.

Just a perfunctory study of the way the “philanthropic” foundations controlled by the Rockefellers and their friends channel their funds, show that most of their efforts is devoted to finance organizations whose main goal, overt or covert, is population control through eugenics. We must also keep in mind their ability to instigate wars and revolutions, and to artificially create plagues and famine, the most effective way to control population growth.

But, even after they had devoted much money and effort for more than half a century to curb population, they reached the conclusion that population growth was uncontrollable unless they were to take more drastic measures to stop it. So, after conducting long and rigorous “scientific” studies, they concluded that, in order to guarantee their survival at the levels of luxury and superabundance they are used to, they had to eliminate no less than 85 percent of the planet’s population and reduce the survivors to pre-industrial levels of consumption. And the only way to accomplish it was by the implantation of a worldwide communo-fascist form of government that they call the New World Order.

After the end of WWII, population in the Western world increased dramatically, a phenomenon later known as the “baby boom.” This was the result of series of factors, like better diet, access to pure drinking water, modern drugs and medical procedures and overall improved hygiene. Between 1957 and 1990 the birth rate exceeded so much the death rate that the world’s population almost doubled.

The members of the world’s elites became extremely concerned. Secret studies made by elite organizations such as the Bilderberg Group, the Club of Rome and others rang the alarm. Studies like The Population Bomb,[6] The Limits to Growth[7] and The Global 2000 Report to the President,[8] a Report to President Carter, agreed that overpopulation was the biggest threat to civilization.

Further proof that one of the true goals of the global warming charade is actually population control is that one of the main measures proposed in the international climate change summit at Copenhagen in December, 2009, is to adopt the Chinese government’s policy of just one child per family.

Now, let’s suppose for the sake of argument that for the next three years we have two feet of snow in Miami in August, the sea levels are actually receding, and the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have decreased. Faced with the unavoidable reality of a global cooling,[9] the global warming hoax would not be longer sustainable. Would that mean that the globalwarmers would recant and admit they were wrong?

Of course not. They would never admit they were wrong because they never believed themselves the lie they have been telling us.

Currently, particularly after this frigid winter, it would be very difficult to convince, much less scare the people about the coming global warming. A recent article published in a global-warming-friendly site, tells how more and more Americans find hard to believe the globalwarmers.[10]

On the other hand, what is important in this discussion is not if there is a global warming or a global cooling. That is for true scientists to decide. What is relevant is that the change, if there is any, is caused by humans burning coal and driving SUVs, and that, in order to reverse climate change we need to change our way of living, which is a lie.[11]

Now, one may ask, didn’t the globalwarmers foresee that, very soon nature would betray them and everybody was going to realize that the global warming theory was nothing but a big hoax? The answer is that they miscalculated. Actually, the CFR conspirators and their globalwarmer allies miscalculated badly.

But they miscalculated not in the sense that they didn’t know that instead of a global warming what most likely was coming was a global cooling. No. They knew it very well. For example, as early as 1971, two of the current globalwarmers warned about the threat of global cooling, and blamed it on the same things they blame the global warming:

The continued rapid cooling of the earth since World War II is also in accord with the increased global air pollution associated with industrialization, mechanization, urbanization, and an exploding population.[12]

In 1975, Science magazine alerted its readers about a report of the National Academy of Science:

According to the Academy report on climate, we may be approaching the end of a major interglacial cycle, with the approach of a full-blown 100,000-year ice age a real possibility.[13]

Evidently, the CFR conspirators and their minions didn’t miscalculate about the coming global cooling. What they miscalculated, though, was the deadline for their plans to carry out the full implementation of the New World Order. In a 1975 article in the first issue of Alternatives: A Journal of World Politics, its editor, CFR agent Saul Mendlovitz, wrote: “... [it] is no longer a question of whether or not there will be a world government by the year 2000.”

Mendlovitz was not alone. Addressing a 1981 Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington, D.C., former Defense Secretary Harold Brown (CFR), pointed out that new leadership and new plans were required for a “transition to the world of 2000.” In response to Brown’s call, CFR members Robert Anderson, Russell Train, Walter Cronkite, Elliot Richardson, Cyrus Vance and other CFR members, formed the “Committee on the Year 2000,” whose goal is to provide the new leadership and new plans needed for the implementation of the coming New World Order.

In February 25, 1990, the Washington Post published an article by CFR agent Don Oberdorfer, “New World Order Galloping into Position,” in which he affirmed: “A new world order is taking shape so fast that governments as well as private citizens find it difficult to absorb ‘the gallop of events’...”

That same year, on the eve of the Gulf War, Gen. Brent Scowcroft (CFR) said: “A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.” The CFR’s Annual Report for 1991 affirmed: “Obviously, the stage is being set —in Europe, in the Soviet Union, in the Middle East, and elsewhere— for a new world order.”

Most revealing of the conspirator’s wet dreams of global domination is a Report produced by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), an organization formed mostly by so-called “neocons,” supporters of the Bush administration. The 90-page Report, entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century” was published in September 2000. In synthesis, the Report called for an era of open, uncontested global CFR imperialism based on brute U.S. military force.[14]

It is evident that the CFR conspirators were confident that by the end of the century their New World Order would have been fully implemented. After that, they reasoned, with full control over the world press, nobody was going to discover, much less to publish, that the global warming charade was nothing but a hoax. But then, to their utter surprise, Russia got a second wind, began opposing the NWO, and the conspirators’ plans stalled. Moreover, they miscalculated about the growing power of the alternative media thanks to the Internet.

Well, the ball is now in our court. It is time to fight fiercely the conspirators’ evil plans, and show everybody that the global warming “theory” is actually a hoax, part of a psychological warfare operation whose true goal was convincing us to voluntarily accept that, in order to save planet Earth, we must kill our children and live forever like dirty poor beggars. Nothing but a real-life hunger games.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily E-Mail Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

So, the choice is ours. Either we fight back nail and tooth and defend our right to life, freedom and property, or become slaves of the New World Order globalist conspirators.

For many years most of the people in world saw America as a beacon of freedom and liberty. Let’s prove to them that America is still the land of the free and the home of the brave. It its time to tell the Rockefellers, Obama, the Bushes, the Clintons, the traitors in Congress, the disinformers in the mainstream media, and the rest of the New World Order conspirators that we don’t like their plans.

So, if you are mad as hell and you’re not going to take it anymore, go to the closest window, open it, and yell at the top of your lungs:

We don’t like your New World Order.

Click here for part -----> 1,


1. In the mid-1970s, the same “scientists” that now are scaring us with a catastrophic global warming were scaring the people with the coming of a catastrophic global cooling. On April 28, 1975, the cover article of Newsweek warned about a coming global cooling. On July 1975, Nigel Calder, former editor of the New Scientist, wrote that research from past ice ages indicated “that a threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind. On August 14, 1976, The New York Times reported “many signs that the Earth may be headed for another ice age.” Gary Sutton, co-founder of Teledesic and CEO of several other companies, wrote that in 2002 he stood in a room of the Smithsonian, where “an entire wall charted the cooling of our globe over the last 60 million years.” See, Gary Sutton, “The Fiction Of Climate Science,” Forbes.Com, April 12, 2009
2. In the 1950s, before he changed his opinion, atomic scientist and geochemist Harrison Brown, mentor of John Holdren, Obama’s science czar, suggested the possibility of forcing higher levels of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to increase food production. See, Jerome R. Corsi, “Science Czar’s Guru Called For More Carbon,”, December 7, 2009
3. See, Marvin Tessneer, “Military Meteorologist is Global Warming Skeptic,” The Las Cruces Bulletin, October 23, 2009, p. A13.
4. Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science in Society, (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1952), p. 40.
5. See, i.e., Brian Winter, “Poor Blame Rich at Climate Talks,” USA Today, December 10, 2009, p. 6A.
6. Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb (New York: Ballantine, 1968).
7. Donella H. Meadows et. al., The Limits to Growth: A Report of the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind (New York: Universe Books, 1972).
8. The Global 2000 Report to the President (New York: Pergamon, 1980).
9. Robert Felix, Not by Fire But by Ice: The Next Ice Age Now (Bellevue, WA: Sugarhouse Publishing, 2007).
10. Stephanie Pappas, “Climate Change Disbelief Rises in America,”, January 16, 2014.
11. It seems that, contrary to globalwarmers’ claims, the drastic climatic changes we are currently experiencing have more to do with solar than human activity. See, i.e., “Has the Sun Gone to Sleep?,” BBCNews, 17 January 2014
12. Reid Brysin, “Environmental Roulette,” in John P. Holdren and Paul R. Ehrlich, editors, Global Ecology: Readings Toward a Rational Strategy for Man (Sidney: Hardcourt, 1971).
13. Science, March 1, 1975.
14. Project for the New American Century, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century,” September, 2000,

Share This Article

Click Here For Mass E-mailing


Servando Gonzalez, is a Cuban-born American writer, historian, semiologist and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics. Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución fidelista, Observando, The Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The Nuclear Deception: Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis and La madre de todas las conspiraciones: Una novela de ideas subversivas, all available at

He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro, California, both available at the author's site at

His book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People is available at Or download a .pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer, iPad, Nook, Kindle or any other tablet. His book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters, is available at Servando's book (in Spanish) La CIA, Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, is available at and other bookstores online.

His most recent book, I Dare Call It treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of the America, just appeared and is available at and other bookstores online.

Servando's two most recent books in digital versions only are The Swastika and the Nazis: A Study of the Misuse of the Swastika by the Nazis and the first issue of the political satire series OBSERVANDO: American Inventors.










Global cooling, acid rain, the ozone hole, the greenhouse effect, and now global warming (later conveniently changed into “climate change”), have been the rolled-up newspapers thrown past the people’s eyes to divert them from the true cause of the problem.