OREGON JUDGES HAVEN'T TAKEN
CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED OATH
May
15, 2001
NewsWithViews.com
After experiencing great
injustice in Oregon courts, abuse of power, and judges failure to uphold
any law in favor of the innocent, I began to research, study, and learn,
what, why, and how our judges are able to get away with it.
What follows, is one topic and a fraction of what I have uncovered.
I drove up to the state capital to do some intensive research. What I
uncovered at the Secretary of State Archives Division horrified me.
Since 1998, Oregon’s alleged Judges have been taking (swearing to)
false, inadequate and incorrect oaths.
The consequences of a judge not taking the constitutionally
required oath, creates a scenario in which the alleged judge is biased and
prejudiced while having no jurisdiction or authority to rule on any matter
in Oregon.
There are three versions of a judges oaths.
-
The
first oath is the original 1857-59 Constitution Article 7
Section 21 as drafted by our founding fathers.
Update: The first judge in over 90 years to take the original proper
oath was Judge Ellen F. Rosenblum the week of October 3rd 2001 in Multnomah
County, Oregon during a hearing in which her improper oath was
challenged by a former Multnomah County Prosecutor.
-
The
second version is Constitutionally Amended Article 7 Section 7,
amended in 1910.
-
The
third version is the false and incorrect oaths of office which most judges having been taking (swearing to) since 1998. This version has
never been constitutionally amended! And, it has the words 'and
impartially' omitted. Therefore it's
un-constitutional and fraudulent.
Reference Oregon State Constitution, reprinted in any Oregon Blue
Book.
The First Oath (original)
| (Original)
Section 21 “I _______ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
support the Constitution of the United States, and the
constitution of the State of Oregon, and that I will faithfully,
and impartially
discharge the duties of a
Judge of the Supreme,
and Circuits (sic) Courts of said, State
according to the best of my ability, and that I will not accept
any other office, except Judicial offices during the term for
which I have been elected.” |
The Second Oath (constitutionally amended)
| (Amended)
Section 7 “I, _______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
support the constitution of the United States, and the
constitution of the State of Oregon, and that I will faithfully and
impartially
discharge the duties of a
judge of the supreme court of
this state,
according to the best of my ability, and that I will not accept
any other office, except judicial offices, during the term for
which I have been elected.” |
The Third and fraudulent
oath, in use since 1998
Note: The fraudulent oath in
use today, reprinted below, has vital and crucial words omitted. These
words are highlighted in red above, in the proper oaths.
| "I, _______, do solemnly
swear, or affirm, that I will support the Constitution of the
United States, and the Constitution of the State of Oregon, and
that I will faithfully discharge the duties of Judge of the Circuit
Court according to the best of my ability, and that I will not
accept any other office, except a judicial office, during the term
for which I have been elected." |
What
was their motive to omit, words like "and impartially"? Is
it possible the word "impartially" was omitted in order to allow
judges to be biased and unjust?
Below for example purposes are copy's of few Josephine County judges’
Oaths. With a quick look, one
will notice that Judge Allan H. Coon has a Amended 7
Sec. 7, while the other judges have an improper oath or no oath at all. Judge Coon is one of few judges statewide who
have a constitutionally proper oath.
I
encourage others to research their judges oaths in their states.
