PART 2 of 3
Jon Christian Ryter
February 17, 2010
Building the foundation of lies
It is first important to understand, when we examine the foundation of lies upon which the theory of global warming was fabricated, that the elite ecoalarmists who created this massive tax scheme expect the human chattel of the industrialized nations, not themselves, to make the sacrifices and pay the tariffs which will be used to radically redistribute the wealth of the middle class of the industrialized world to the governments of the third world nations. Evidence of that fraud was recently made public when, shortly before the Global Warming Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark on Dec. 6-18, 2009, scores of reporters around the world received copies of several emails hacked from the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, in Norwich, England, in which global warming advocates talked freely about altering climate data which did not support their claims. Many of Britain's leading scientists-in what has been dubbbed "Climategate" by the London Daily Telegraph-have been accussed of manipulating climate-change data in the 47-year old university whose motto is "Do Different."
While the CRU claims they were "hacked," and that's how the data got into the public newsstream, authorities responsible for administering the Act said that htee University of East Anglia flouted Freedom of Infomation regulations in its handling of requests for data from climate skeptics. When the requests for data persisted, the IPCC made certain that no information was given to anyone who disagreed with the views of the global warming advocates. The circumstances surrounding the "hacking" and the actions of the climate scientists who concealed or destroyed information are now being investigated by the University. The group is headed by Sir Muir Russell, now the Vice Chancellor og Glasgow University.
The hacking of the files is separately being investigated by Norfolk police. The leftwingers who did their best to conceal their faulty research and their attempt to alter climate data research by legitimate climate scientists to make their conclusions appear bogus and their research appear sloppy are demanding that anyone who breached the FOIA and gave information to global warming skeptics face charges. Deputy Information Director Graham Smith said you can't have an investigation with only part of the information made public. "I don't think you can have the inquiry unless you have all of the issues relating to it out in the open."
The files were hacked by David Hollard, a grandfather with a background in electrical engineering. Hollard is now working with an angry group of Brits who are demanding that many of England's leading scientists be prosecuted. The government has agreed to investigate several scientists from other universities connected with the Climate Research Unit. People around the world do not yet realize the magnitude of this growing scandal since this is more than an ideological movement (which most people, initially, thought it was). This was, and still is, an elitist scheme to rob, under the cloak of law, the middle class of the world, and through taxation, to redistribute the wealth of the industrial nations to the emerging population-bulging third world economies where the consumers of the 21st century live. The merchants who buy and sell Cap & Trade credits will become billionaires at the expense of the vanishing middle class of the United States, and the money sent to the nations where global warming doesn't count will be used to create a modern, 21st infrastructure at the expense of the working class of the industrial nations which no longer buys enough of the consumer goods created by the princes of industry and barons of business to satisfy their greed.
Passed by the House, HR 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (sponsored by Congressmen Henry Waxman [D-CA] and Edward Markey [D-MA] was passed by the House by a vote of 219 to 211 on June 26. The bill requires the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions by 17% by 2020. The Senate version, which calls for a 20% reduction in carbon emissions, was sponsored by Senators John Kerry [DMA] and Barbara Boxer [D-CA]. It cleared the US Senate on a 60 to 40 vote, also on June 26. But becuase of the election of Sen. Scott brown [R-MA], the Senate is talking about changing the rules because they now only have 59 votes. The bill has not cleared Joint Conference. It was supposed to be Obama's gift to the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit. Holland threw a monkey wrench into that plan.
Hollard said he hacked the emails only after being stonewalled by the CRU. Hollard submitted several Freedom of Information requests with the university and received condescending replies from the University for his efforts. While the Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research at the University, Trevor Davies, said "...CRU's full data will be published in the interests of research transparency when we have the necessary agreements..." (which will likely be the day after Hell freezes over) "...We...understand that responses take several months, and that some countries may refuse permission due to the economic value of the data." In other words, if the British government does not have jurisdiction over them, not only will no one see their collective work,. They will not see any of the private communications between the elitists on how to discredit honest climate scientists who dispute the conclusions reached by deliberately flawed computer models.
In An Inconvenient Truth, Gore alleges that "...temperature change is the cause, not the result, of changing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels." Ninety-one percent of the climate scientists in the world disagree, arguing that collected evidence overwhelmingly show that rising temperatures precede increased levels of CO2. Ice core sample studies from Antarctica dating back hundreds of thousands of years show that rising temperatures always precede increased levels of carbon dioxide—even in places not inhabited by man. The isotope samples provide data about the temperatures and levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at the time when the ice was produced. The Antarctic core samples conclusively prove that temperature spikes on Earth always preceded atmospheric carbon dioxide increases.
The biggest problem facing the ecoalarmists who believe that global warming is a fixable condition caused by man is the reams of evidence throughout the history of this planet prove we experience cyclic phases of both cooling and warming that are easily shown not to be man-related. Six thousand one hundred forty-four boreholes in both polar regions on Earth prove that the global temperatures on Earth during medieval times—some 700 years ago—was actually warmer than it is today. To make matters worse for the global warming ecoalarmists, CO2 levels were much lower, thus the medieval warming phase doesn't fit the global warming climate models and needed to be eliminated.
That evidence has been a thorn in the sides of the ecoalarmists, and the wealthy foundations who support them financially, and the greedy princes of business and industry who are attempting to use global warming as the instrument to redistribute the wealth of the industrialized nations to the human capital-rich emerging nations of the third world where tomorrow's consumers live—people who have nothing and need everything. In 1998 Dr. Michael Mann, a young Ph.D. from the University of Virginia (now a climate scientist at Penn State) co-authored a paper with climateologist Raymond S. Bradley from the University of Massachusetts to prove that the medieval warming phase that made Greenland and Iceland temperate lands that were hospital to farming never happened. Bradley argued, in fact, that there were no periods of global warming during that last 1,000 to 1,500 years.
Bradley went to Mann whose work on analyzing tree rings to determine warming and cooling phases had been singled out by then Vice President Al Gore and included, as fact, in the US National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Gore particularly liked Mann's conclusions because they contradicted reams of embarrassing historic evidence that factually confirmed the medieval warming period had occurred. Mann's "statistics" seemed to show 900 years of static global temperatures that suddenly spiraled upward after 1910—with the advent of the gas-guzzling automobile. As a reward for his ground-breaking work, Mann was rewarded by the Clinton Administration by being named one of the primary authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] and a senior editor of The Journal of Climate. His ship had come in. He proved that global warming was Mann-made. As it turns out, his research was a fraud.
Mann's theory, from his "tree ring study," concluded that that Earth's temperatures remained fairly static from 1,000 AD to 2,000 AD, with only minor, normal, seasonal fluctuations in temperature offsets but with a tremendous spike between 1900 and 1910 that Mann attributed to the advent of the internal combustion engine and, of course, carbon dioxide. Mann's theory became known as the "hockey stick theory" (as depicted in the illustration here). Mann's paper, now referred to only as MBH98 was entitled "Northern Hemisphere Temperatures During the Past Millennium: Inferences, Uncertainties and Limitations."
In 2004, two Canadians from the University of Guelph, Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, who were writing a paper on the Medieval Warming Period, were stymied by Mann's claims and sent dozens of requests to the IPCC for copies of Mann's research. In 2008 Mann published a follow-up article to reinforce his tree ring claims due to the controversy caused by McIntyre and McKitrick. Mann's co-author, Keith Briffa of the Hadley Climate Research Unit in England used one of the data tree ring studies in his own article which appeared in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society that same year. England has a transparency law that actually forces transparency. After being denied the data by the Hadley Unit, which first claimed it has lost of all the original data, the head of the Climate Unit bluntly asked McIntyre why it should make data available to him when he would use the data to find something wrong with it? McIntyre sued under England's Freedom of Information Act and received all of the "lost" Mann data from that series.
As it turned out, when Mann was doing his research, tree ring samples were taken from hundreds of trees, yet only 10 were selectively used by Mann to form his hypothesis. Why? Because they were the only tree ring samples which supported his hypothesis. That's the problem when "scientists" start with conclusions and force feed the premises by deliberately excluding all evidence that disputes their preconceived view.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Once McIntyre had Mann's original research, it was only a matter of days before he was able to prove that Mann's statistics were so flawed that they were completely unreliable. To make matters worse, in the thesis that accompanied his math, Mann claimed to have included tree ring data that had been deliberately excluded. When McIntyre corrected the data, the medieval warming phase popped up in the graph and the 1910 "head of the hockey stick" vanished. For part three click below.