NewsWithViews on Pinterest NewsWithViews on Google+

Additional Titles








Vote Fraud: What They Aren't Telling You

Forced Mental Health Screening for Your Children












By: Devvy
November 10, 2013

As we all can see, sexual deviants are becoming more aggressive in trampling our God-given rights backed up by ignorant and/or activist judges, both at the state and federal level. Part of the reason why is more sexual deviants are being elected or appointed to judgeships.

Allow me to do a little back story here because it's critically important Americans understand how they've been manipulated into believing something that is not true. George Orwell defined it as doublethink:

"Doublethink is the act of ordinary people simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in distinct social contexts. Doublethink is related to, but differs from, hypocrisy and neutrality. Somewhat related but almost the opposite is cognitive dissonance, where contradictory beliefs cause conflict in one's mind. Doublethink is notable due to a lack of cognitive dissonance — thus the person is completely unaware of any conflict or contradiction.

"According to the novel, doublethink is: “The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies – all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth."

For 37 years, Exodus International was a leading voice in helping sexual deviants turn away from sin and their dangerous sexual preferences. On June 19, 2013, that organization announced they were not only closing their doors, their president, Alan Chambers, actually apologized to sexual deviants for their decades of helping the lost and confused. The reason made me want to gag. Doublethink.

In order to sell something so toxic, you have to market the product in a way that becomes acceptable to the masses using a lot of positive images. After all, telling youngsters and pre-teens anal sex can expose you to HIV/AIDS isn't the picture leaders of the sexual deviant movement want to portray. They want to parade "funny" people like Ellen DeGeneres into your living room to show you how normal lesbians are, just regular Americans. Add a media icon like Oprah selling the message on her show reaching millions of empty headed women and the advancement of the cause increases in a big way.

The term 'sexual preference' was used until 1992, when the battle for a constitutional amendment was raging in Colorado. Sexual deviants were losing that fight because opponents reminded voters that sexual deviants preferred, their own words, unnatural sex. That's when a new marketing term was born: 'sexual orientation' to promote the pervasive lie "born that way" to sway voters. It didn't work, we passed Amendment Two to the Colorado State Constitution; activist judges then over turned the will of the people.

As time went by, more clever marketing came into play and the word 'gay' was birthed to make Americans forget homosexuals have sex in each other's feces; I refer to it as bowel movement sex. From there the next step in marketing became comparing 'sexual orientation' to the civil rights movement. If one is born with black skin, they simply cannot wake up one day and declare themselves to be Caucasian and vice-a-versa. God made humans with different color skin, all equal in his eyes as it should be in everyone's. You can't simply decide one day to change your race to another race. The militant sexual deviant movement has tried to make that one stick, but thankfully, a large number of Americans, black and white, haven't drank the poison:

Civil Rights Activist: ‘No Comparison’ Between Civil Rights, Gay Rights Movement

Sodomites claim they are born that way and have no choice in their attraction to men instead of a woman. The same for lesbians. They claim just as someone with black or white skin, they have no choice. Really? Thousands of sodomites and lesbians have left their destructive, preferred life styles. Actress Anne Heche used to have sex with Ellen DeGeneres. Ms. Heche then went on to marry a man, have a child. Unfortunately, she divorced, allegedly due to a new relationship, not with a woman, but with a man. So, which way was Ms. Heche born? Another clear example I can give you that it's a choice and not an "accident" of birth is the candor of WNBA star Sheryl Swoopes. In an interview following her "coming out" in 2005, this was the exchange:

Interviewer: "You have said that you don't believe you were born gay, which, as you said, may confuse many people. How do you believe you came to be gay?"

SW: "I think there are a lot of people -- gays and lesbians -- who believe you are born that way. I think there also a lot of people who believe it's a choice. And, for me, I believe it was a choice. I was at a point in my life where I had gone through a divorce and was not in a relationship, and the choice I made happened to be that I fell in love with another woman. It might confuse some people, and some people may not understand that, but I think in life, no matter what it is that you're doing, you always have a choice and you make that choice and you have to live with that choice. And it just happened that, you know, my partner and I were really, really good friends, and the more we hung out, the more we did stuff together, my feelings grew stronger and stronger for her, and it got to a point to where I said, "I can't fight this any more."

Ms. Swoopes made the choice of embracing sin because she wanted to, not because she was born that way. But, wait! Ms. Swoopes has been engaged to a man since 2011. So, I guess she's not "gay" anymore.

Ignorant, useful fools in NYC just elected a died in the wool Marxist for their next mayor, Bill De Blasio. His wife, Chirlane McCray, is a "former" lesbian. Angelina Jolie used to have sex with a female; now she's engaged to Brad Pitt. Amber Heard has sex with men and women; her current partner is Johnny Depp. Makes your head spin.

Lawrence v Texas (2003) went all the way to the un-Supreme Court and is worth mentioning here:

"In her opinion, Justice O'Connor did not deny that homosexuality is a voluntarily chosen "lifestyle" --a startling admission. In his highly acclaimed work, "How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary," legal scholar and constitutional attorney, Dr. Edwin Vieira sums up the Lawrence decision:

“Rather the majority opinion in Lawrence "effectively decrees the end of all legislation" based on morals of any kind. For if morality cannot be invoked as a legitimate basis for legislation in a sexual-morality case, how can it be invoked in any other? Surely the particular area of conduct to which We the People address their moral judgments cannot determine the constitutional outcome.

“Thus, perforce of Lawrence, in the future to constitute "due process of law" as a basis for limiting "liberty," all legislation must be amoral – that is, all legislation must demonstrably serve some goal other than a concededly moral one. A "wall of separation" between morality and state must be thrown up and maintained.

“Therefore, the Lawrence majority's repudiation of the history of Western civilization and Christian moral and ethical standards amounted to repudiation of the Declaration of Independence and consequently the Constitution, and consequently again, the justices' own authority – further proof that whom the gods would destroy they first make mad.”

"In the Lawrence decision, the Supreme Court not only came up with one of the most convoluted, toxic decisions of the past century, it went much deeper than that. This was an all out attack on states' rights. This decision was so putrid, it should have caused a massive uproar from every Christian, minister, pastor and priest in this country and demand for removal of half the U.S. Supreme Court. The silence has been deafening. This decision not only bodes something akin to a death knell for America's moral foundation, the injection of international law into America's judicial system has set an unbelievably dangerous precedent."

Countless lawsuits have been filed over the past decade by Christians who refuse to genuflect at the altar of political correctness. Some cases have been won on religious grounds, others who know the Bible is God's words and His Commandments haven't been so lucky:

Supremes asked to halt 'compelled' lesbian speech

"The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to restore religious and speech freedoms in New Mexico, where the state Supreme Court recently ruled that abandoning one's freedom is just the “price of citizenship.” The dispute centers on the refusal by Elaine Huguenin, co-owner with her husband, Jonathan, of Elane Photography, to memorialize a same-sex ceremony planned by Vanessa Willock. Willock, who found another photographer for the event, filed a complaint with the state under its anti-discrimination law. The state Supreme Court said the photographer had no right to not be forced to express statements through her work that violated her Christian beliefs."

The attack on Christianity in this country is reaching the level of fanaticism. Americans are losing their businesses because their religious beliefs are being trampled by thugs on the bench:

‘Bible-Thumping…B**ch’: Bakers Who Refused to Make Gay Couple's Wedding Cake Shut Down Their Shop Following Threats

"In May, The Blaze told you about Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, an Oregon-based bakery that has fallen under intense scrutiny. Throughout 2013, the Christian couple and their business have been in the midst of a media firestorm after refusing to make a wedding cake for a lesbian couple. From threats to vicious phone calls and e-mails, the Klein family has been inundated with angry responses. Now, Aaron and Melissa have announced that they are shutting down their shop."

Those 'tolerant' sexual deviants who demand everyone else give up their religious beliefs so less than 2% of the population can run rough shod over the entire country displayed the usual hate towards anyone who disagrees with their filthy sexual preferences:

"From proclamations that Aaron should be shot to one apparent threat that he be raped, the hate and angst being thrown the Klein family's way is certainly serious in nature. Some have even wished for the couple's five children to be stricken with illness. Earlier this summer, Aaron and Melissa shared a number of these e-mails with The Blaze. “You stupid bible-thumping, hypocritical b**ch. I hope your kids get really, really, sick and you go out of business,” read one e-mail. “Here's hoping you go out of business, you bigot. Enjoy hell,” read another."

Bigot? Reminds me of this quote: "It's better to be silent and presumed a fool than to open your mouth and doubt removed altogether." The List of 7 by Mark Frost

Sexual deviants have always had an agenda. One is to get a foot hold in public schools; they have succeeded with ease. Predators trolling schools across the country for fresh recruits. Since sexual deviants don't reproduce; their goal is to brainwash your child(ren) into adopting a dangerous lifestyle of filth and sin. A whole lot of those grade school students are now on college campuses continuing the push for deviancy and spreading diseases and AIDS/HIV. Second and of utmost importance:

'Gays' admit END A game: Outlaw Christian morality - The religious liberty death spiral continues.

"One of the most dangerous and discriminatory pieces of legislation in modern times – the ironically tagged “Employment Non-Discrimination Act,” or ENDA – passed the U.S. Senate on Thursday by a vote of 64-32. Ten Republicans disgracefully joined liberal Democrats in this effort to ultimately outlaw the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic.

"According to its leftist proponents, ENDA would merely insulate people who choose to engage in homosexual conduct (sexual orientation) or those who suffer from gender confusion (gender identity) against employment intolerance. In truth, however, this legislation effectively would codify the very thing it purports to combat: workplace discrimination.

"Writing in the Huffington Post, popular homosexual radio personality Michelangelo Signorile confessed that, of any potential ENDA legislation that might reach President Obama’s desk for his pledged signature, “none should include any religious exemptions” whatsoever.

"If Signorile and other “LGBT” activists get their way, this would mean that churches, mosques, synagogues, religious schools, Bible bookstores, as well as any and every other business in America with 15 or more employees, would be forced, under penalty of law, to abandon the biblical and traditional-values viewpoint on human sexuality, and hire (and otherwise not offend) those who openly flaunt expressly sinful and demonstrably self-destructive sexual behaviors."

Communism can only survive in a God-less country where the 'state' becomes the parents and total authority over what you can and cannot say, think or feel. The push to Sovietize these united States of America is all but a fait accompli. Normalizing and legalizing sexual deviancy has always been a top goal:

The revolution of the family: the Marxist roots of ‘homosexualism’ (Do take the time to read the full column)

"I have been asked recently “what is homosexualism?” I started using the term in my writing on these issues a few years ago when it became clear that we were dealing not with a group of people, but with a particular ideology that is often held by people who are not themselves homosexuals.

"A few days ago in The Guardian, Peter Tatchell wrote a pretty good description not only of that ideology's goals but its origins. This political ideology, often called “queer theory” by its proponents in academia, is what is being pushed, quite openly these days, by the “gay rights” movement. Despite what we are told all day by their collaborators in the mainstream media, from the six o'clock news to your favourite sit-com, this movement is not about “equal rights”. It is about re-writing the foundational concepts of our entire society. I predict that it will not be much longer before the pretense of “equality” is dropped, having done its work.

"Many people are scratching their heads and asking how we have suddenly found ourselves at the point where two men can be “married,” a woman can be called a “husband” and a man, a “wife,” and children are reduced to political bargaining chips in the adoption wars, when it seems just yesterday we were only talking about equal rights. Since when do “equal rights” mean deconstructing, dismantling, these foundational social concepts?

"If we read them closely, however, the activists themselves have begun to explain it in quite straightforward terms. For them, it has never been about “equal rights” but about the re-writing of our entire social order. The “gay rights” movement has always been, in Peter Tatchell’s own words, “revolutionary, not reformist.”

"Others have pointed out the Marxist origins of the Sexual Revolution as a whole, and it is clear that the sudden explosion of homosexualism is merely the next logical step in a systematic programme. A close cousin to radical feminism and grandchild of Marxism, homosexualism was developed out of the politico-academic pseudo-field of “gender studies” and has, for 30 or 40 years, been pushed on a mostly unwilling public, through “anti-discrimination” and “equalities” legislation by a coalition of lobbyists, NGOs and politicians on the extreme left, and in increasingly powerful international circles."

The one issue sexual deviants stay away from is science because it's the fatal blow to the big lie of born that way.

Decades ago, Simon LeVey, a homosexual and author of Queer Science, attempted to use science to prove sexual deviants are born that way. LeVey's science has been highly criticized over the years, yet sexual deviates held up LeVey as the scientific genius proving "born that way." However, many forgot LeVey's own words on that: "It's important to stress what I didn't find. I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work."

Please take the time to read the two articles below because it IS the issue that must become a legal one:

Identical twin studies prove homosexuality is not genetic

"Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way....

"Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.” Dr. Whitehead believes same-sex attraction (SSA) is caused by “non-shared factors,” things happening to one twin but not the other, or a personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the other.

"For example, one twin might have exposure to pornography or sexual abuse, but not the other. One twin may interpret and respond to their family or classroom environment differently than the other. “These individual and idiosyncratic responses to random events and to common environmental factors predominate,” he says."

"This is the Way God Made Me"- A Scientific Examination of Homosexuality and the "Gay Gene"

"Consider the obvious problem of survival for individuals who allegedly possess a gay gene: individuals who have partners of the same sex are biologically unable to reproduce (without resorting to artificial means). Therefore, if an alleged “gay gene” did exist, the homosexual population eventually would disappear altogether. We now know that it is not scientifically accurate to refer to a “gay gene” as the causative agent in homosexuality. The available evidence clearly establishes that no such gene has been identified. Additionally, evidence exists which documents that homosexuals can change their sexual orientation. Future decisions regarding policies about, and/or treatment of, homosexuals should reflect this knowledge."

But, of course, it's exactly those scientific findings sexual deviants don't want in the court room. There goes the bogus "civil rights" argument as well as the "I was born that way" falsehood - the main staples of the sexual deviant crowd in selling their toxic sexual behavior to children, parents, lawmakers and the courts. Strip away the "born that way" by science and there goes the sympathy factor. It also pins judges to science instead of religion.

Sexual deviants and their supporters always resort to name calling (homophobic or worse) in response to opposition to their preferred, dangerous sexual preferences. Bring up the issue of science and they go ballistic. This isn't about not liking a sodomite or lesbian. I have met several over the years who seem to be really nice people. I don't (and never have) called them ugly names like faggot. I do pity them because God has called what they do an abomination and they risk spending eternity in hell. This isn't about being nice, it's about science. It's also about saving lives.

HIV/AIDS is preventable and so are the dozens and dozens of 'lavender' diseases which plague sodomites: Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do. Horrific, and yet, sodomites continue spreading those horrible medical problems and diseases. Sodomy should be declared a national health issue and condemned, not celebrated. Instead the U.S. government and Department of Defense are the biggest promoters in the world of HIV/AIDS and all the diseases spread by sexual deviants.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

If I were a business owner like the two cited at the top of this column or any other individual or entity charged with discrimination, I wouldn't just put all my eggs in the religion basket (although it is absolutely the right of those folks to protect their religious beliefs), I would also make the case in court that sexual deviants are not born that way. How can you discriminate against someone for a behavior they choose to engage in?

Should priests, pastors or even a justice of the peace of the peace be forced to "marry" individuals who claim they were born to have sex with dogs or horses or children or other deviant acts? Where will it end? Just say, I'm born that way and all is excused? I think not. It's time to put science at the top of the legal battle and expose the truth.

I have included another appendix of items you might have missed. Click here.

There is help for sexual deviants who sincerely wish to turn their lives around:

1- Homosexuals Anonymous
2- P-FOX (Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays) also offer resources and support.
3- The National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality


Click here to visit home page.

© 2013 - and Devvy - All Rights Reserved

Share This Article

Click Here For Mass E-mailing

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.

Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: You can also sign up for her free email alerts.

E-mail is:









As we all can see, sexual deviants are becoming more aggressive in trampling our God-given rights backed up by ignorant and/or activist judges, both at the state and federal level. Part of the reason why is more sexual deviants are being elected or appointed to judgeships.