Additional Titles








Governance Bankrupting

K12� ... Panacea
or Plague?

Out Of Chaos,

Safe Schools?

Words Have Meaning

Homeschools, Private Schools,
and Systems Education










By Lynn Stuter

December 9, 2008

Over the past several days a number of people have sent me e-mails listing out all the records that should exist on Barack Hussein Obama. It’s a laundry list, chief among those records are his vault copy birth certificate — that would show where he was born; his school records — showing whether he applied for aid as a foreign student; and his passports — which would show in what countries Obama has claimed citizenship. Of the records that have been obtained, the Certification of Live Birth produced by Obama has been proven a forgery (Note: the link to has been removed; the site has either been hacked or removed from the internet); his selective service registration has also been proven a forgery, and the school registration from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia has been proven authentic but proves that Obama’s name was changed to Barry Soetoro when adopted by his mother’s second husband, and that he was a citizen of Indonesia when he was enrolled in the Fransiskus Assisi School.

Do Barack Hussein Obama’s college records show that he applied for aid as a foreign student? Does his actual vault copy Hawaii birth certificate show that he was born in Kenya? Was the passport on which Obama traveled in 1981 when he visited Pakistan issued by Indonesia?

These are questions Americans want answered and have every right to have answered. They are questions, however, that Obama refuses to answer.

For a man who ran his campaign on a pledge of openness and transparency, Obama is overly reticent when it comes to records which he should, as a servant of the people, gladly provide for public viewing. So reticent is Obama, in fact, that he has spent over a half million dollars trying to get out of producing a document that would cost him $12.00 to have reproduced, and that would answer a question that every American should be asking: is Obama a natural born citizen as required by Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution in order to be eligible to the office of president. That Obama has hired not one but three law firms trying to keep from producing a $12.00 document makes his reasons for doing so highly suspect.

If he passes the hurdle of where he was born, then he must clear the hurdles of Indonesian citizenship, his various and sundry aliases, and what country issued the passport in 1981 that he used when he visited Indonesia then Pakistan, a country in turmoil.


So much for that overblown claim of being a “man of the people.” He’s about as much a man of the people as was William Jefferson Clinton whose close circle of “friends” seemed to end up with “Arkansas flu” on a regular enough basis that those who remained knew their continued existence depended on whether they kept their mouths shut about the Clintons’ illicit affairs, of every variety. And the people victimized by the Clintons’ penchant for extramarital affairs also learned to keep their mouths shut lest they end up like Vince Foster, the victim of one of those bizarre suicides that seemed to plague people who crossed the Clintons. Speaking of the Clintons, how ironic that Obama has chosen his arch-rival for the Democrat Party nomination, Senator Hillary Clinton, to be his Secretary of State in violation of Article I, Section 6, United States Constitution:

No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time: and no person holding any office under the United States, shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office.

While the Senate and House have carefully avoided the subject of Obama’s eligibility to the office of president (even Representative Ron Paul), Senator Byrd of West Virginia was quick to question the constitutionality of the Clinton nomination. CNN and Fox News even jumped on the band wagon. If the Senate and House have no authority to address the eligibility of the president under the United States Constitution, then the Senate and House do not have the authority to, in any way, question whether Clinton’s appointment as Secretary of State violates the Constitution. To do so is to selectively enforce the provisions of the Constitution. Under the rule of law, they address both or they address neither.

And true to form, the mainstream media has, for the most part, remained silent about the growing controversy over Barack Hussein Obama’s zeal to keep his vault copy Hawaii birth certificate from being examined. Those news outlets that have addressed it have done so with short articles erroneously claiming that what Obama produced in June of this year was his “birth certificate.” Nothing could be further from the truth. One such article appeared on December 4, 2008, in the Honolulu Advertiser. This is one of the newspapers that printed the Obama birth announcement, devoid of the name of the hospital, back in 1961. The article, like so many fluff pieces put out by the mainstream media, took a little truth, a big lie, wrapped them up together, and spit them out as “the truth”. The article claims that,

During the presidential campaign, the Obama camp posted a copy of his Honolulu birth certificate on its Web site. That copy indicates he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961.

It is true that Obama posted a document on his website that indicates he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961; but that “document” was not a birth certificate; it was a Certification of Live Birth which proves nothing about where he was actually born. Under Hawaiian law, Obama could have been born in Kenya and his birth still registered in Hawaii even though he was not a natural born citizen by birth, not an American citizen at all. The Certification of Live Birth does not provide that information.

The Honolulu Advertiser is situated in Honolulu, Hawaii. Can we assume, then, that those employed by the Honolulu Advertiser in the great state of Hawaii don’t know the difference between a birth certificate and a Certification of Live Birth as issued by the State of Hawaii? Did the individual who wrote this fluff piece really not know that the two documents are not the same, or was he/she deliberately misstating the case? My e-mail to the Honolulu Advertiser asking the obvious questions remains unanswered; probably answer enough.

Another such article was written by Tom Ramstack of the Washington Times. In that article Ramstack claims,

Mr. Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961.

My e-mail to Mr Ramstack, pointing out the error in his piece, also remains unanswered; again, answer enough.

That mainstream media cannot get something as simple as the difference between two distinctly dissimilar documents straight makes one wonder just how much they do report accurately; and how much they deliberately report as the truth that isn’t.


And not to be ignored is the blog of David Horowitz of FrontPage Magazine in which he admonishes those asking if Obama is eligible to the office of president to “get over it.” Get over what, Mr Horowitz? The fact that our constitution is in jeopardy? Do you really think that constitutes “right-wing trash talk”? Get over it? Not on your life, Mr Horowitz. Shame on you for even daring to suggest such a thing. If you are the same David Horowitz who wrote Radical Son and Hating Whitey, either I missed something in reading those books or you should know better than most that our Constitution remains intact only so long as we, the people, remain eternally vigilant. That you seem to think 64,000,000 votes for Obama — approximately 29.6% of the total voting-age populace — trumps the U.S. Constitution is unbelievable! That you think “what the people say, goes” is preposterous. That isn’t rule by law, that’s rule by the majority with the rights of the minority at the whim of the majority; that’s rule by man according to his own passions, opinions and prejudices; that’s democracy; that’s mobocracy! In case you aren’t aware, we are not a democracy, for all the mainstream media’s calling us that, for all George Bush’s erroneous contentions that we are; we are a republic with a republican form of government as guaranteed by Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution. That you think we will disenfranchise 64 million voters if Obama is found ineligible is no reason to not press the issue. It is far better that 64 million voters be disenfranchised than for 306,000,000 Americans to wake up tomorrow to no Constitution whatever! The simple fact is that you ignore the Constitution at your own peril.

And not to be ignored are all the pro-Obama court jesters who carefully skirt the real issues concerning Obama’s eligibility to the office of president and launch into smear campaigns that are supposed to pass as journalistic endeavor against those who dare ask the hard questions, working diligently to paint them as some whacked out conspiracy theorists who “refuse to see the truth” and shouldn’t be believed. Their idea of “truth,” however, leaves much to be desired. And when their voices become shrill, as they have, you know you are way too close to the truth. These court jesters can’t bear the thought that their “messiah” might end up as the emperor with no clothes.

It has been suggested, in more than one venue, that the choosing of Obama, a man who at least looks black, to run for president at this time, knowing full well that the question of his eligibility would arise, is no coincidence, is no mistake; that it was and is a very calculated and deliberate move to see how the American people would respond, just as Waco and Ruby Ridge were very calculated and deliberate moves to see if the American people would tolerate an attack on their rights under the color of quashing religious fanaticism.

Time after time, the global one-world government agenda has had to be pushed back because of resistance from the American people. Being unable to complete the concept of transformational Marxism via gradualism or the “quiet revolution” according to the wanted timeline, violent means becomes the avenue of change. What better way to do that then to pit those who erroneously believe Obama will give to them what they haven’t earned against those who believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. And when armed conflict ensues, one side against the other, does it not serve the purpose of the puppet master who can then seize power in a coup, immediately dispensing with the Constitution and the rights inherent therein under the color of martial law?

On Friday, the United States Supreme Court met in conference to consider Donofrio vs Wells. Their decision, obviously made on Friday, was not, however, made public until today. And obviously, the delay in announcing that decision was to give the government the time needed to respond to any violence that might erupt when the decision of the court was made public.

On Friday, the United States Supreme Court sidestepped its responsibility to the American people. In so doing, the United States Supreme Court made it very clear that it is the agent of the puppet master that calls the shots in Washington, DC; the shadow government so many want to deny the existence of but that too many Americans are now aware of to give any credence to any attempt at denial.

The United States Supreme Court has made it clear that it will bless the presidency of a man who, by all appearances and by his failure to produce the most basic of documents proving his right to run for the highest office in the United States, is not eligible to the office of president. If Obama truly loved this country as he claims, he would have produced the evidence of his eligibility to the office of president long ago. That he has not makes it very apparent that he is not eligible and is a usurper, plain and simple.

In its failure to act on behalf the citizens of the United States, the United States Supreme Court has made it very clear that it is no longer an agent of justice as required by our constitution; that it is nothing more than the legal arm of the puppet master, forcing upon the American people the tyranny of the communist/fascist agenda. Obama is the bastard child of the same puppet master. Lawsuits challenging the eligibility of Obama to the office of president have been filed in at least 28 states. Those lawsuits will meet the same fate of indifference as has Donofrio vs Wells and Berg vs Obama. And they will meet the same fate because the United States Supreme Court, to a justice, has made it clear they are the whores of the puppet master.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Those who believe in the one document that has made our country the great nation that it is, will either acquiesce or fight. Today we either stand for the Constitution and Bill of Rights or America ceases to exist.

Further reading:

1 - Why the POTUS Needs to be a Natural-Born Citizen
2 - Update: Obama’s Birth Status
3 - Weatherman terrorists: Obama’s centrism a ‘smokescreen’
4 - That Bleeping Birth Certificate
5 - Supreme Court to Uphold or Ignore the Constitution?
6 - President-elect Obama: It’s Time To Come Clean On Your Birth Certificate
7 - Obama: The Trojan Horse

� 2008 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved

E-mail This Page

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

Activist and researcher, Stuter has spent the last fifteen years researching systems theory and systems philosophy with a particular emphasis on education as it pertains to achieving the sustainable global environment. She home schooled two daughters. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance, the sustainable global environment and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and a growing body of citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a participatory democracy. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.

Web site:










For a man who ran his campaign on a pledge of openness and transparency, Obama is overly reticent when it comes to records which he should, as a servant of the people, gladly provide for public viewing.