THE
SELECTION OF COMRADE OBAMA
By
Lynn Stuter
November
11, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
Election
2008 is finally over. Most Americans are rejoicing that the endless
barrage of nauseatingly stupid campaign ads have finally, I mean finally,
disappeared from their television screens. The collective sigh of relief
was truly universal no matter the political persuasion.
In
a history-making moment, it was revealed to Americans who their next
president would be: Barack Hussein Obama. The charade was accompanied
by television coverage of people dancing in the streets across the United
States.
Many
believe he was elected. The rest know he was (s)elected. There have
been a few clues along the way; some more obvious than others.
One
of the first clues was the attitude of the mainstream media. Their bias
toward Barack Hussein Obama has been so obvious as to be in-your-face.
There is a lot about Barack Hussein Obama that should have been revealed
to the public by the mainstream media were they doing their job. Barack
Obama’s connections to Marxist organizations like the Industrial
Areas Foundation, ACORN, Midwest Academy, Students for a Democratic
Society and the Black Panthers were never revealed by the mainstream
media; any of them. Nor was the fact that Frank Marshall Davis, poet,
journalist, and member of the Communist Party USA, admitted mentor and
advisor to Obama, ever touched on by the mainstream media. Obama’s
association with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Nation of Islam leader Louis
Farrakhan, and Weatherman Underground member William Ayers were downplayed
when they should have been investigated and reported on.
Nor
has the mainstream media, to this day, reported on the growing concern
that Barack Hussein Obama is not
an American by birth; also the fact that he was adopted by his stepfather
and became an Indonesian citizen; excluding him from eligibility to
seek the office of president of the United States. Many people believe
the government vetted the candidates for eligibility. But who says they
really did; who made sure they did? If anyone in any agency of the United
States government vetted Obama or McCain for eligibility, why haven’t
they come forward and said so? A judge in California threw out a lawsuit
filed to remove McCain from the California ballot. In his opinion,
the judge indicates that the question of eligibility of candidates must
come in the form of an objection in Congress at the time of the counting
of the electoral votes.
Nor
did the mainstream media report on the poll intimidation that occurred
on November 4th, one incident of many being in Philadelphia where two
black men, dressed in Black Panther attire, one carrying a billy club,
were filmed outside a Philadelphia polling place. The intent was obviously
to intimidate white voters arriving to cast their vote. Racial slurs
concerning "white supremacy" were allegedly made. The Black
Panther carrying the billy club was escorted off the premises by police
called to the scene; the other one was allowed to stay. This was but
one instance that occurred. Were this type of conduct not the modus
operandi of organizations like the IAF and ACORN, the SDS and Black
Panthers, if they were not the tactics taught by organizations like
the Midwest Academy, we could easily say that they don’t represent
the president elect, but Barack Hussein Obama’s affiliations with
these organizations does not speak well of him, and does not set well
with many Americans.
When
Barbara West, a Fox News correspondent for WFTV out of Florida, asked
Joe Biden, vice presidential hopeful, about the Marxist
quote “from each according to his ability to each according
to his need” as it applied to Obama’s intent to redistribute
wealth, Biden responded, “Are you joking? Is this a joke?”
Complaints were forthcoming and Barbara West was labeled “right
wing.” Her question was a fair one and one that needed to be asked.
The ABC News clip made Obama’s intent of “sharing the wealth”
very clear.
Appearing
on the wthr.com website, out of Indianapolis, Indiana, on November 6,
2008, was a piece entitled “Obama
campaign workers angry over unpaid wages.” At the very bottom
of the article appears the following missive:
Now,
considering the title, why do you suppose the comment tool was disabled?
Could it be that people who canvassed for Barack Hussein Obama’s
campaign got a taste of the real Obama and were sounding off in droves?
Get used to it people; the mirage that the mainstream media has projected
for the past two years isn’t the real man. Get used to being treated
this way, there is more to come. Barack Hussein Obama may redistribute
your wealth, but I can assure you, he hasn’t and won’t redistribute
his. He still has his $1.65 million dollar mansion, bought for $300,000
under market value in a deal that has raised questions about his connections
to the Chicago
underworld and convicted underworld figure, Antoin “Tony”
Rezko.
In
the two weeks leading up to the election, I had occasion to be at Costco
and was browsing through their books. There, among the books for children,
was a book on Barack Hussein Obama. It portrayed Obama as a “man
of the people,” a “messiah” of sorts. The book was
purely a propaganda piece. I looked to see if there were any books for
children about McCain or any of the other candidates; there were none.
On Wednesday, following the election, I was again browsing through the
books at Costco and there was one about Obama’s change agenda.
The thought that flitted through my mind was, “gee, they wrote
it, ran it to the publisher, and got it to the store shelves in a matter
of hours!” It’s obvious that isn’t what happened;
it’s obvious the book was already written. Quite obviously, if
some didn’t already know who would be our next president, the
publishing of the book would have been delayed until after the election
was decided.
Advertisement
In
the same two weeks leading up to the election, e-mails arrived describing
how propaganda concerning Obama appeared in a high school English
Literature textbook in Racine, Wisconsin while not one word was
written about the other candidates in that same textbook.
I’m
not a fan of Oprah Winfrey, who is a practitioner and promoter of the
New Age theosophy and apostasy “Law
of Attraction,” but happened to catch part of her program
on Wednesday, November 5th. Guess what Winfrey’s program was about?
In the twelve or so hours, between the time Obama was officially declared
the winner on Tuesday night, and the time Winfrey went on the air on
Wednesday, through the overnight hours, a program was put together celebrating
the election of a Barack Hussein Obama to the White House. On her program
appeared a panel
of five individuals all appearing via satellite, all from different
locations. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that
a program of this magnitude cannot be put together in that short a timeframe,
not and come off as well scripted as the program obviously was.
The
Republican Party ran a campaign intended to lose. First off, they choose
a loser candidate. Mitt Romney had more appeal to voters than did John
McCain. Yet Mitt Romney suddenly, for no apparent reason, when he was
leading McCain by a wide margin, dropped out of the race. And once “the
candidate,” McCain campaigned with the same ineptitude, the same
lackluster, the same disorganized inefficiency that Bob Dole did against
William Jefferson Clinton. Then McCain chose Sarah Palin as a running
mate, hoping that by so doing that he could attract the massive number
of Ron Paul supporters back into the Republican camp and pick up women
defectors among former Hillary Clinton fans. Both ploys were flops.
Ron Paul supporters, by and large, abandoned the morally defunct Republican
Party when it castigated Ron Paul, and the only Hillary supporters who
defected were those who would vote for a woman no matter who she was.
These
are but a few of the indications out there that Barack Hussein Obama
was not elected, he was (s)elected. All these might be just coincidence,
but there is no such thing as coincidence in the political world of
today.
The
responses I received from Obama supporters to my last article, Will
our next president by communist or fascist? fell into five basic
categories:
1-
Some tried to play the race card; a tactic used by racists to digress
from the issues. This was a favored tactic throughout the Obama campaign.
2-
Some made the accusation of “poor loser.” Unfortunately,
who loses is everyone. Exposing Barack Obama for the communist he is
isn’t being a “poor loser;” it’s just a label
thrown out there, like “racist” by those who really don’t
want to face the facts and the truth of what he is.
3-
Some invited anyone who didn’t like Obama to leave the United
States; in so doing making their support of Obama and his Marxist ideals
just that much more apparent; also their lack of understanding of the
Constitution and Bill of Rights, explaining why they would support a
candidate like Obama.
4-
One mentally-challenged individual suggested that maybe I and “my
accomplices” were “planning something a little more drastic”
regarding Barack Obama. Given his affiliations and his Marxist ideals,
that sort of conduct is more likely to come from the Obama camp than
from those who believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Black
Panthers showing up at Philadelphia polling places is just one example;
the e-mail from Magda Robinson (relative
of Michelle Robinson Obama?) to Devvy Kidd being another.
5-
Still others railed on about how Obama would help the little people
of this nation, stop corporate fascism, and end the Iraq war.
In
four years, let’s hear what they have to say.
I
will predict that in four years,
1 - the “little people” will be worse off
financially and have less freedom than they do today;
2 - the middle class will continue to disappear;
3 - small businesses will be fewer;
4 - corporate fascism will be alive and well and growing
(they own Obama, too);
5 - the Iraq occupation will still be going on;
6 - U.S. imperial expansionism will be alive and well;
7 - the education system in America will still be dumbing-down
children;
8 - the “war on terror” will still be going
on, costing trillions and going nowhere constructive;
9 - the “war on drugs” (started under President
Reagan in the 80’s) will still be going on, costing trillions
and going nowhere constructive;
10 - the “war on poverty” (started under
President Johnson in the 60’s) will still be going on, costing
trillions and going nowhere constructive;
11 - more social welfare programs will be in place
that will create more people living in poverty;
12 - the quality of health care will continue a downward
spiral while costs continue to increase;
13 - U.S. jobs will still be heading overseas;
14 - energy costs will have increased substantially
from what they are today;
15 - the northern and southern borders will be just
an open and unprotected as they are today;
16 - the illegal alien invasion will be an even bigger
problem than it is today;
17 - the Mexican drug war will have spilled over into
the United States;
18 - the United States will be well on it’s way
to dissolving its borders in favor of the North American Union;
19 - the dollar will be on the way out and the Amero
will be on the way in;
20 - control of the U.S. financial markets will have
been transferred to a global entity outside the United States;
21 - the U.S. economy will be in worse shape than it
is now;
And
last but not least, these two little gems, emanating from remarks Obama
has made on the campaign trail:
22
- the establishment of a compulsory
“volunteer” civilian youth corps much like the Hitler
youth camps;
23 - the establishment of a domestic security force
much like the Hitler Schutzstaffel (SS).
|
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
|
How
can I make these predictions with any certainty? Because I know the
game-plan; it’s called “The Sustainable Global Environment”
and all of these are part of bringing it about. Barack Obama will not
deviate from the Strategic Plan already in place as the next step of
bringing it about. One individual who responded to my last article stated
that Obama would not have carte blanche to do as he pleases. They were
right; for all his campaign promises, Barack Obama will do exactly as
he’s told just as did his predecessor, George W Bush.
� 2008 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights
Reserved
