Additional Titles








Vote Fraud: What They Aren't Telling You

Forced Mental Health Screening for Your Children













By: Devvy
January 15, 2007

� 2007 -

Joseph Stalin said that voters decide nothing; people who count votes decide everything. I have personally seen the five minute report below:

"From Dan Rather's five-minute 1988 televised report on computerized vote fraud. Mr. Rather asked computer expert Howard J. Strauss of Princeton University: "Realistically, could the fix be put on in a national election?" Mr. Strauss responded "Get me a job with the company that writes the software for this program. I'd have access to one third of the votes. Is that enough to fix a general election?" Strauss also said "When it comes to computerized elections, there are no safeguards. It's not a door without locks, it's a house without doors."

Before I get into the illusion of fair and impartial elections, there is some good news: candidates from the Constitution Party were elected to public offices. Rick Jore was elected to the Montana State Legislature. Other CP candidates as well were elected: "Two candidates in Nevada's Independent American Party were also elected to office. Jackie Berg was elected Eureka County Clerk with 54.10% of the vote, easily topping Republican and Libertarian opposition. Also, Cel Ochoa will be the new constable in Searchlight, Nevada by virtue of winning 54.93% of the vote to defeat her Republican rival. Another feather in the cap of the Nevada Independent Party was the victory of IAP member Bill Wilkerson to the Elko School Board, in a non-partisan race. Congratulations to our soon to be incumbent office holders in Nevada!"

The reason these Constitution Party candidates won is because people voted for them. Imagine that. As someone who has run for Congress, I am fully versed in how corrupt the system is and the black hole voting which takes place with electronic machines. It's a joke if you knew what went on in my race (fully covered in my Blind Loyalty booklet available on my CD). That booklet is a treasure trove of vote fraud. You can also watch a speech I gave (free Internet video) that covers a great deal of the blatant fraud via these electronic machines taken from my booklet.

How many Americans remember what ABCNEWS.COM did back on election eve 1998? I can tell you. On November 2, 1998, the night before the general election, ABCNEWS.COM posted the following: "Earlier tonight, during testing of the ABCNEWS.COM site, we inadvertently posted results and erroneous predictions on the outcomes of races. There was no bias intended by what we posted and the predictions do not reflect the reporting or news judgment of ABC News." Notice the key word used in their statement: results. Was this just a glitch and how accurate were these numbers released a full 12 hours before any polls opened in America? A complete analysis of all the results posted and the "final" totals reflect that ABC News was off .0174%. What would you say the odds of that happening are and don't you wish you'd bet a bundle on their numbers? For those that don't know, back in those days an organization called VNS (Voter News Service) issued all the nationwide results with 0% precincts reporting, minutes after polls close. They called all these races within a few percentage points. Amazing. Enough exposure was finally cast upon VNS and that rotten operation was finally shut down. The excuse was the 2000 debacle, but the heat was on them big time before that because Americans caught on to the game and where shouting down the roof.

Following election night, a new claim surfaced that vote fraud played a major role in the election of counterfeit U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman (CT):

"We may have the clearest evidence of vote fraud coming out of Connecticut with the re-election of Pro-Israel Joe Lieberman as an Independent. (Then a link to this site.) Now, how exactly did Lieberman win TWO elections and his two opponents got exactly the SAME number of votes at exactly 448,077 votes each time?!?! "In Connecticut Ned Lamont (Dem.) lost EXACTLY with THE SAME number of votes as did Phil Giordano (Rep.) collected in 2000." The source of this rumor linked above states: "Joe Lieberman,", a man who was denied the vice presidency by third-party spoiler candidate Ralph Nader, "won" with 562,850 votes."

This 562,850 votes link directs you to the E-Vote site below and that number doesn't even match theirs; E-Vote shows 563,725.

According to the Secretary of State's office in Connecticut, their final statement of vote is this:

2000 General Election results:
Joseph Lieberman -Democrat: 828,902
Phil Giordano - Republican: 448,077
Others: 34,282

2006 General Election results:

Joseph Lieberman
Connecticut for Lieberman: 564,095
Alan Schlesinger - Republican: 109,198
Ned Lamont - Democrat: 450,844
Others: 10,640 gives these numbers for 2000 listing Lieberman as an Independent:

Phil Giordano- Republican 448,077
Joseph Lieberman - Independent 828,902
Others: 34,282 gives these numbers for 2006:

Ned Lamont -Democrat: 448,077 - This number does not match the Secretary of State (above); a difference of 2,767 votes
Joseph Lieberman - Independent: 563,725 - This number does not match the Secretary of State (above); a difference of 370 votes
Alan Schlesinger - Republican: 109,329
Others: 5923

In the 2006 race, others were Ferrucci, 5922 votes; E-Vote states 5923. They leave out Knibbs, 4638 votes, Vassar 80 votes.

The accuracy of the Secretary of State's numbers in my opinion is suspect because of the machines. However, the exercise above again demonstrates how one person can blog something, someone else picks it up and without doing the homework and because they might have a small amount of credibility with a few and people want to believe something, this erroneous and unverifiable data suddenly becomes fact spread all around the world. Shame on these people for not verifying the numbers available. This type of yellow journalism only hurts sincere efforts to expose the fraud. One thing is for certain, even though Socialist Bernard Sanders and Joseph Liberman serve in the U.S. Senate under a law that flat out does not exist: both are independents and that goes not give the Democrats a majority in the Senate. Also, Sanders is an open Socialist. I do not believe he should be allowed to serve in Congress since he works towards destroying our legal form of government: a constitutional republic. It is difficult for me to believe that the people of Vermont would continue to elect an open socialist to office.

There's no question in my mind that the smarmy and utterly gutless Harry Reid (D-NV) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA), another dizzy, empty headed female, both got into office the first time by vote fraud. Those two races were a complete mess and the phony vote numbers got certified. You can do the research on these two races and it's simply a travesty to call them legal elections. As I said in a recent column this isn't a "new" Congress. The same inept members of Congress who were fired in the phony 'Republican Revolution' in 1994 for not getting the job are still here in 2007, i.e., Pelosi, Rangel, Waxman, Harman, Abercrombie, Conyers, Biden, Kennedy, Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer, Rockefeller, Levin and Sarbanes. With the exception of 26 seats, the same Republicans who didn't get the job done for the past 12 years and have destroyed the Bill of Rights, are still in Congress this term (2007/2008).

Back in 1993 when I started my research and exposing the issue of vote fraud via electronic machines, people scoffed and asked why? Simple: There is a shadow government running this country. They have an agenda and the only way they can be sure that agenda will be carried forth is by making sure the right puppets get elected and stay in office. Here and there you'll see a legal election (like Ron Paul) to make the process look legitimate. Every decade or so, we see a "revolution" by voters who "reject the agenda" of the current office holders. Makes it all look quite real and gives the masses (that's us) the illusion we are in control of who runs our government. Sadly, nothing could be further from the truth. For those who haven't done the research, I respectfully recommend you do as I have done going on 17 years now. Besides my columns and the other excellent writers on this web site, you can start at my Reading Room. Then come back and tell me I'm wrong. Of course, most won't even make a small effort, they just send me e-mail full of their ignorance, sometimes laced with all kinds of profanity or attacks on me personally.

I have prepared a compilation of problems that happened last November (2006) on election night. No doubt there's more, but to track them all down in all 50 states would take me a year and I know there is much more, i.e., the massive problems in the Allen-Webb race. This new list I put together is massive and I submit to you that we have no idea who legally won seats either in Congress, the state houses and even for local offices because the fraud is every where. If you'd like a good dose of what happened this past November, please go to this link and read for yourself; each instance is documented.

What this shift in power did was to give the majority to the Democrats who will give Bush what he's wanted so badly: rewarding criminals (illegal aliens) who have smuggled themselves into our country, stealing jobs that belong to Americans (born here or naturalized) and are busy stealing our identities to get jobs they have no legal right to work. The crime wave by illegal aliens is horrendous, but the Democrats flat out don't give a damn. They will give Bush a full amnesty, leave our borders open and the situation will continue to deteriorate beyond what most people can even imagine. This was sent to me a few days ago by a U.S. Border Agent I will not name; I have condensed and paraphrased this update regarding the shooting incident last week: What has been reported in the media is a distortion about how serious the situation actually was and that it made this agent's "skin crawl." This was a direct assault on American troops by the Mexican Military, specifically their special forces. There were three incidents in a 24-hour period. Our troops have been portrayed as cowards, but only those on the ground really know how serious the it was and that our men and women are brave and courageous.

Most certainly our troops are, it's the cowards serving in Congress since 1986, now headed up by Matriarch Madame Pelosi, who don't have the stomach to declare this an invasion and a direct assault on U.S. soil. That's EXACTLY what this is: when a foreign country's military crosses onto our soil or fires on our citizens or military, it should be treated as an invasion and a declaration of war issued. Then we'll see who carries the big stick. No one wants this, but Mexico's corrupt government is responsible for not respecting our borders and fostering this dangerous situation. They're rubbing our faces in it while grandma Pelosi and her crowd watch football games. In the meantime, an average of 12 Americans every day are being slaughtered by illegals.

The American people must become as vocal on this crisis before it escalates to the point of no return and the vote fraud mess. No more machines. The feds have spent BILLIONS to "fix" a problem they created by telling the states they need to use these insidious machines. Get rid of them - all of them, period. Go back to paper ballots, hand counted in the precincts in front of the public. That's the only way to get a fair and accurate account. Anything else is just prolonging a problem that will continue to rob we the people of fair and accurate elections. We the people can wait a few days to find out who wins a particular race, but we demand accuracy - not fast food style elections. The other thing that must happen for the 2008 elections (we need to do this even though it's going to be a VERY rough ride between now and then) is demand our county clerks purge their voting rolls and get rid of the illegals, deceased and double voters on the rolls. I cover this in my Blind Loyalty booklet and the free video cited above. The voting rolls are so tainted, there is no way to determine who is voting legally. This is beyond outrageous; there's no question the voting rolls are filled with illegal aliens voting. This can be done but it requires man power. It's not a political issue, it's an American issue.

So, too, is the illegals invasion and like Frosty Wooldridge, I ask you to please contact these organizations and become a voice. Frosty and I are doing as many radio shows as we can booked on to help people get organized. You can help by hounding your favorite talk radio show hosts to get us on the air. Here are Frosty's recommendations:

To stop illegal aliens in your community, you may follow the course of action by Mayor Louis Barletta of Hazelton, PA. He offers a bomb proof ordinance that takes business licenses away from those who hire illegals. He legally halts landlords from renting to illegals. Without work and without housing, illegals cannot stay in your community. Check out his web site for instructions:

Visit D.A. King at the to see how Georgia created the best laws to stop illegals at the state level.

Please check out William Gheen at He's a mover and shaker. He will direct you to specific actions that make you more powerful and impactful.

To stop this invasion locally and nationally: join for free and you can join and

Related Columns:

1, Vote fraud: what they aren't telling you
Electoral college votes already committed?
The machines will remember in November
What you can do to stop vote fraud
Vote fraud: Candidates must audit the count
Vote fraud: Worse than you think
Vote Fraud Research by Devvy

� 2007 - - All Rights Reserved

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs to no organization.

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site ( contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

Devvy's website:

E-mail is:









Before I get into the illusion of fair and impartial elections, there is some good news: candidates from the Constitution Party were elected to public offices.