Additional Titles







Other Sizemore Articles:

Blame The Oregon
Supreme Court For The P.E.R.S. Problem

'Vote By Mail' A
Formula For Fraud






By Bill Sizemore

April 4, 2003

Did you vote in the last election? Did you sign a petition to help put on the ballot some issue you really cared about? You might think you know the answer to those questions, but you very well might be wrong.

You see, you can claim you signed a petition or cast a ballot. You might be able to prove you did. You can even swear under oath that you did. But truth is, according to Oregon Secretary of State, you only signed a petition or cast a ballot, if the county clerk says you did.

Hold on, you say. If I voted, I voted. If I signed a petition, I signed. That�s not the way it works in Oregon. According to the Secretary of State, if a county employee at the local elections office, a staff person with no expertise in handwriting analysis, says your signature on a petition or on your vote-by-mail ballot doesn�t look like the signature on your voter registration card, your signature doesn�t count and your vote doesn�t count. You�re out. You�re disenfranchised. You might as well have not bothered.

Your constitutional right to vote and your right to petition your government by initiative is simply tossed into the trashcan.

My experience with Oregon�s Secretary of State these past months has been a real eye-opener. An initiative I sponsored, a proposal to stop unions from deducting political funds from employees� paychecks without first getting the employee�s authorization, was kept off the ballot because the Secretary of State, who opposed my measure, determined that I fell 531 signatures short of the required 89,048 valid signatures.

However, after the Secretary of State declared that I didn�t have enough valid signatures, (I had collected about 50,000 more than were required.) I analyzed his calculations and found that local county clerks had invalidated more than 4,800 signatures, simply because in their opinions, the signatures on the petitions didn�t match the signers� voter registration cards. These signatures were called �No Match� signatures.

Bear in mind that the local election clerks are not experts in handwriting analysis. Bear in mind that many voters registered to vote decades ago and their signatures have changed over the years and may not look at all like the signature they long ago affixed to their voter registration card. Bear in mind that people often sign petitions while holding a shaky clipboard in one hand and a child or bag of groceries under their other arm. None of that matters. Neither does that fact that none of us sign our names exactly the same any two times.

In Oregon, if the county clerk says the signature on the petition doesn�t match the voter registration card, the signature doesn�t count.

Of course, the question that immediately springs to mind is: If it�s not really the voter�s signature on the petition, who really signed it? After all, it�s either a genuine signature or it�s a forgery. Right?

We decided to find out. We began contacting people whose signatures were invalidating for not matching their voter registration cards. We spent two weeks contacting people all across Oregon. In all our searching, we failed to find a single person on the �No Match� list, who claimed the signature on the petition wasn�t theirs. Every person said the signature was indeed theirs. In fact, during the process we obtained enough sworn, notarized affidavits from signers, swearing that the signatures on the petitions were indeed theirs, to prove in court that we had enough signatures to make the ballot. We even had a thousand signatures or so to spare.

Remember though, the Secretary of State, a liberal Democrat who receives large campaign donations from public sector unions strongly opposed our measure. It was no surprise, therefore, that he refused to accept or even look at the sworn affidavits. He chose rather to place the opinion of a non-expert, county elections employee over the sworn testimony of the actual signers.

Alas, we took the case to court. Surely, we would find justice there. Surely a judge would recognize that an affidavit sworn by the person who actually signed the petition would outweigh the mere opinion of a county employee with no experience in handwriting analysis.

To insure that justice would be served, in addition to the sworn affidavits, we produced for the judge testimony by a real expert in handwriting analysis, that more than a thousand rejected petition signatures were so close to the signatures on the voters' registration cards that even a novice should have been able to tell it was signed by the same person.

The Secretary of State, aided by the Attorney General, another liberal Democrat who receives large donations from the public sector unions, objected to the expert�s testimony as irrelevant; claiming instead that county clerks have the statutory right to make mistakes. The Marion Country judge agreed.

Justice meant nothing. Constitutional rights meant nothing. The judge simply dismissed the case and kept our measure off the ballot, ruling that state statutes give the clerks the final authority to decide if a signature is valid, and proving that they were wrong is irrelevant.

In other words, even though the evidence was clear that we had enough signatures to qualify our initiative for the ballot with more than a thousand signatures to spare, the Secretary of State has the right to keep the measure off the ballot, if he wants to. And he wanted to.

In summary, what I discovered in this process should shock and dismay even my most liberal opponents. My measure was kept off the ballot, even though I clearly had enough signatures to qualify under the Oregon Constitution. What was done with my measure was a violation of the constitutional right of every single person who signed my petition. It was a violation of the right of every Oregon voter who was deprived of their right to vote on my ballot measure, but never had the chance. It was a blow to all those workers who have money taken out of their paychecks to fund some union political cause they don't personally support.

What measures will the next secretary of state oppose? Maybe the next secretary will be a conservative and abuse his position to keep a liberal measure off the ballot. Who knows. Either way, it�s wrong. It's immoral. It's un-American.

The problem doesn�t end with initiatives, though, It extends to actual votes that are cast by mail, including votes cast by absentee ballot. Local elections officials have the authority to nullify the ballots of voters whose signatures on their absentee or mail-in ballot do not appear to match their voter registration card.

This is a big deal. This is a sacred area they're messing in. If this policy isn�t reversed, close elections, whether local or statewide, could be decided not by the votes cast for or against a candidate or measure, but by untrained county clerks who arbitrarily reject vote-by-mail or absentee ballot signatures as not matching.

After discovering what the elections employees were doing with the signatures on my initiative petitions, I decided to ask officials at the state elections office how this arbitrary policy was applied to actual ballots on Election Day. �How many ballots are not counted because some untrained clerk at the local level says the signatures don�t match," I asked. Their answer: The policy is essentially the same with signatures on ballots. We ignore the entire ballot if a local clerk says the signatures don�t look the same.

When I asked how many ballots were nullified for this reason in the last election, they replied that they don�t know. They had never checked. Or at least that's what they said.

Surely, they ought to know. We all ought to know; especially since the current United States presidency was determined by less than 600 votes in one state. Judging by the number of signatures rejected on my petition, where they only examined a few thousand signatures, the number of actual ballots rejected could run into the tens of thousands.

So you think you voted in the last election. Well, maybe you did. And then again, maybe you didn�t. Maybe your signature didn�t look the same to some low level clerk at the county elections office. Maybe they recognized you as one of those voters who always votes Republican and simply decided that your signature didn�t look quite right and tossed it aside.

After all, what they say about elections is true: It�s not those who vote who decide elections, but those who count the votes. And you thought that was only in third world dictatorships.

� 2003 Bill Sizemore - All Rights Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts


Bill Sizemore is a registered Independent who works as executive director of the Oregon Taxpayers Union, a statewide taxpayer organization. Bill was the Republican candidate for governor in 1998. He and his wife Cindy have four children, ages eight to thirteen, and live on 36 acres in Beavercreek, just southeast of Oregon City, Oregon.

Bill Sizemore is considered one of the foremost experts on the initiative process in the nation, having placed dozens of measures on the statewide ballot. Bill was raised in the logging communities of the Olympic Peninsula of Washington state, and moved to Portland in 1972. He is a graduate of Portland Bible College, where he taught for two years. On the side, he does a daily, one-hour political news commentary show on KKGT Great Talk 1150 AM, a Portland radio station and a contributing writer for  E-Mail:







"In Oregon, if the county clerk says the signature on the petition doesn�t match the voter registration card, the signature doesn�t count."