Additional Titles








Other Kjos Articles:

Harry Potter and The Postmodern Church

Popular Occultism and the Consensus Process

Legalized Mind Control  Part 1

Harry Potter And The Chamber of Secrets

Part 1
Hegelian Alchemy And Mind Changing Games

Part 2
Pagan Fantasies Join The Digital Explosion

Part 3
The Global Message Behind Mystical Thrills


More Kjos Articles:







By Berit Kjos

June 30, 2006


"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis...."[1] David Rockefeller

"I see a world of open borders, open trade and, most importantly, open minds.... I see a world building on the emerging new model of European unity. ... [T]he United Nations is the place to build international support and consensus for meeting the other challenges we face.... [W]e must join together in a new compact -- all of us -- to bring the United Nations into the 21st century."[2] Former President George H. W. Bush

"Why won�t this president and Congress write and enforce a simple, straight-forward immigration policy?"[3] asks journalist Frosty Wooldridge. Others wonder why our government doesn't pull out of the United Nations and abandon its planned merger with Mexico and Canada. Their questions make sense!

But logical answers often ignore the grandiose dreams of the elite revolutionaries who drive the UN agenda. To them, it makes more sense to open our borders, invite illegal immigration, and risk rising lawlessness and terrorism. In fact, each such crisis becomes a potential instrument for change -- a stepping stone toward Lord Tennyson's envisioned "Federation of the world."

"All we need is the right major crisis," said David Rockefeller, "and the nations will accept the New World Order."[1]

Former President Bush echoed that assurance. "Out of these troubled times... a new world order can emerge,"[4] he told Congress in a 1990 message aptly titled "Toward a New World Order." Back then, the opportune crisis was the Gulf War. It helped build public acceptance for a global management system, which had already begun to replace American "rights" with global rules.

The pace of change has quickened since then. As you saw in Part 1, our current president (like his two predecessors) has willingly surrendered Americans to a spreading web of UN declarations, treaties and policies that undermine our constitution. America's "human resources" are now molded, measured and monitored according to global standards for educational outcomes, "mental health," "service learning," and training for a global workforce.[5]

Legal or not, migration is vital to this transformational process! Let's look at some of its goals:


Ancient monarchs understood the transformational power of mass migration. When the mighty Assyrians conquered Israel back in 722 BC, they resettled the land with people who had never heard the truths of God. Soon the blend of new settlers and local residents shifted the people's collective loyalties to new gods and rulers.

This strategy still works! It may explain why globalist politician John Foster Dulles (Secretary of State in the Eisenhower administration) called for free, worldwide immigration in 1942. As chairman of a national conference held by the liberal Federal Council of Churches (precursor to the World Council of Churches), he introduced these goals:

  • a world government of delegated powers
  • immediate limitations on national sovereignty
  • international control of all armies and navies
  • a universal system of money [Revelation 13:17]
  • worldwide freedom of immigration
  • even distribution of the world�s natural wealth."[6]

Even Time magazine seemed shocked by this blatant one-world socialism: "Some of the conference�s economic opinions were almost as sensational as the extreme internationalism of its political program. It held that a �new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative.�[7]

Alger Hiss, the most infamous leader within the Federal Council, was an active Communist and the publisher of the socialist magazine International Conciliation. That didn�t keep him from serving President Roosevelt in the State Department. Nor did it hinder his assignments as the first Secretary General of the United Nations (1945) -- or as president of the multimillion dollar Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.


Western individualism has been thoroughly mocked and maligned by today's leading change agents. No wonder, since free, factual thinking would slow their revolution. They can't win their war unless they modify our minds. John Dewey, father of progressive education in America, described this psycho-social battle in his book, Democracy and Education.

"There is always a danger that increased personal independence will decrease the social capacity of an individual.... It often makes an individual so insensitive in his relations to others as to develop an illusion of being really able to stand and act alone -- an unnamed form of insanity which is responsible for a large part of the remedial suffering of the world."[8]

Equating independent thinking with insanity, Dewey's fighting words illustrate the heartless tactics of his totalitarian contemporaries. Stalin, Hitler and Mao didn't hesitate to remediate or incarcerate resisters as mentally ill. And with the rise of the UN, these views were legitimized among the ruling elite. For example, Canadian psychiatrist Brock Chisholm became the first head of the World Health Organization (WHO). Notice how he presented "mental health" as a useful crisis in the following message, which would later be published by Alger Hiss:

"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas."

"For many generations we have bowed our necks to the yoke of the conviction of sin. We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents....

"There is something to be said... for gently putting aside the mistaken old ways of our elders if that is possible. If it cannot be done gently, it may have to be done roughly or even violently."[9]

Half a century later, the same ideology was cloaked in less threatening language. In 1995, UNESCO issued a report titled, Our Creative Diversity. I read this book on my flight back from the 1996 UN Conference on Human Settlements in Istanbul. It stated:

�The challenge to humanity is to adopt new ways of thinking, new ways of acting, new ways of organizing itself in society, in short, new ways of living."[10]

This message is staggering. Everything must be changed! Students must learn to embrace the "systems" view of reality. Our new "family" would be seen as the entire human race! And the key to success would be countless small groups around the world -- all following occultist Georg Hegel's dialectic process.

Migration -- especially from non-Western nations would be encouraged, for the dialectic process required social and spiritual diversity. Led by trained facilitators toward a pre-planned consensus, the group members must agree to seek "common ground" -- an evolving "unity in diversity". They must share their feelings, listen respectfully, respect all contrary views, and bend their own views to group opinion. Offensive facts and the Bible's "poisonous certainties" would be banned, for these hinder group manipulation. [See Three kinds of group relationships]

Notice that diversity itself is not the problem. Andy and I tramped around the world in our younger days -- paddling up the Nile on the mail boat, trucking through parts of Africa, sleeping on 4th class trains rumbling through India at night. Sometimes we were invited into homes -- Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist or Christian. We shared our beliefs, and they shared theirs, but no facilitator nudged us toward any compromising "common ground."

UNESCO's ways are different. Peter Senge described them well. In his celebrated book, The Fifth Discipline, this MIT guru to corporate managers and church leaders around the world wrote, " should come as no surprise that the unhealthiness of our world today is in direct proportion to our inability to see it as a whole." With that revealing introduction, he goes on to define "systems thinking." Notice the reference to the psycho-social strategies needed for change:

"Systems thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationship rather than things... It is also a set of specific tools and techniques.... [T]hese tools have been applied to understand a wide range of corporate, urban, regional, economic, political, ecological and even psychological systems. [11]

Dr. Senge also co-authored the report, "Communities of Commitment: The Heart of Learning Organizations." It highlights the crisis of "fragmentation" that keeps people from trading "divisive" Biblical views for a more systemic or holistic perspective.:

"Fragmentation, competition, and reactiveness are not problems to be solved -- they are frozen patterns of thought to be dissolved. The solvent we propose is a new way of thinking, feeling, and being.... In the new systems worldview, we move from the primacy of pieces to the primacy of the whole, from absolute truths to coherent interpretations, from self to community."[12]

From absolute truth" to what? A global community that bans God's Word?


When applied to religion, the "new ways of thinking" means setting aside our old "narrow" or inflexible beliefs for the sake of unity. For this to happen, Christianity must either bend or break, yet even church leaders are imposing these psycho-social strategies on their unsuspecting followers. In fact, many Christians now believe this new "systems thinking" is God's purpose for all of humanity. Echoing the message of UNESCO and Dr. Senge, "America's Pastor" Rick Warren tells us,

"We intend to leverage the attention that the Purpose Driven Life has garnered to bring about a whole new way of thinking and acting in the church about our responsibility in the world."[13]

This "responsibility in the world" must focus on humanitarian service, which we will discuss in Part 3. But first, ponder Rick Warren's tone and suggestion in the recent article, "What to do when your church hits a plateau?" Apparently, he was asked how to handle obstacles to change. In his answer, he points to the new way of thinking and acting:

"...some people are going to have to die or leave. Moses had to wander around the desert for 40 years while God killed off a million people before he let them go into the Promised Land. That may be brutally blunt, but it�s true. There may be people in your church who love God sincerely, but who will never, ever change....

"People ask, 'Is it easier to start new churches, or is it easier to take existing churches and turn them around?' My answer is this: 'It's always easier to have babies than to raise the dead.'... People change very slowly. They are resistant to change because they recognize that life as they�ve known it will cease to exist."[14]

Did you notice that the purpose-driven change agents are on the "good" side? People like us who question the new marketing strategies are the ones who must "die or leave."

This mind-changing system has no tolerance for God's divisive Truth. Unless Christianity blends with other religions through diversity, dialogue and deconstruction (tearing down old beliefs) our globalist leaders will continue to face resistance. That's why Federico Mayor, former head of UNESCO used yet another crisis to fuel revolutionary fervor:

"We have witnessed... the resurgence of nationalism, the growth of fundamentalism and of religious and ethnic intolerance. The roots of exclusion and hatred have shown themselves even deeper and more tenacious than we had feared... Peace... requires, in the words of the [UN] Constitution, 'the intellectual and moral solidarity of mankind.'"[15]

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

As hostility toward Biblical Christianity grows in America, these words of Jesus are becoming increasingly relevant:

"If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.... If they persecuted Me they will persecute you... for they do not know the One who sent Me." John 15:19-21


1, David Rockefeller speaking at the UN, Sept. 14, 1994. 109.
2, George Bush, Address Before the 45th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York, October 1st, 1990.
3, Frosty Woldridge's article #163
4, President H. W. Bush addressing Congress, September 11, 1990.
5, The UN Plan For Your Mental Health and Molding Human Resources (That's You) For Global Workforce.
6, Edgar C. Bundy, Collectivism in the Church (1958), page 196-197.
7, Time, March 16, 1942. See also Conforming the Church to the New Millennium
8, John Dewey, Democracy and Education (The Macmillan Company, 1916), chapter 4. Referenced by Dennis Laurence Cuddy, Ph.D., in Chronology of Education With Quotable Quotes.
9, G. Brock Chisholm, "The Re-Establishment of Peacetime Society," Psychiatry, February 1946. Later published by Alger Hiss.
10, UNESCO, Our Creative Diversity, UNESCO's Commission on Culture and [human] Development, page 11.
11, Peter M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline ( Doubleday, 1994), pages 68-69.
12, Communities of Commitment
13, Article
14, What to do When your church hits a plateau

15, Federico Mayor, former Director-General of UNESCO, �Education and Human Development,� UNESCO, 1993. Quoting from Edgar Faure's 1972 report, �Learning to be.�

� 2006 Berit Kjos - All Rights Reserved


Order Berit's book Brave New Schools

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Berit Kjos is a widely respected researcher, writer and conference speaker. A frequent guest on national radio and television programs, Kjos has been interviewed on Point of View (Marlin Maddoux), The 700 Club, Bible Answer Man, Beverly LaHaye Live, Crosstalk and Family Radio Network. She has also been a guest on "Talk Back Live" (CNN) and other secular radio and TV networks.  Her last two books are A Twist of Faith and Brave New Schools. Kjos Ministries Web Site:










The pace of change has quickened since then. As you saw in Part 1, our current president (like his two predecessors) has willingly surrendered Americans to a spreading web of UN declarations, treaties and policies that undermine our constitution.