PART 1 of 2
May 12, 2009
Over the past year, numerous lawsuits have been filed regarding the eligibility of Also Known As (AKA) Obama to the office of president of the United States of America under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.
While AKA claims to have been born in Hawaii, evidence shows that no one, outside a select group of people known to support his cause, has actually seen the document he claims is his birth certificate and that he claims he obtained from the Department of Health in Hawaii.
Regards the "birth certificate":
The document he claims is his birth certificate is not a birth certificate,
it's a Certification of Live Birth; a birth certificate is issued at the
time of birth; in this case 1961 before computers and computer generated
2. The pictures of this document, that have turned up on the internet have been tampered with, meaning, quite bluntly, they have been forged/altered.
3. Any pictures that show up on the internet cannot be construed as legal proof of anything; to be legal proof that they are an exacting copy of the original requires a notarized document to that effect.
4. Requests of the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), under freedom of information, to produce the documents, signed by AKA, requesting what he is presenting as his "birth certificate", have not been responded to, suggesting that,
a. The HDOH is deliberated obstructing the people's right to know;
b. No such request was ever made by AKA and the documents AKA are presenting are, indeed, forged as has been stated by forensic specialists in sworn affidavits;
c. The HDOH is hoping that in dragging their feet, the request for disclosure will be abandoned.
In regards to number four above, the last request for disclosure was sent, via e-mail, receipts requested, on May 5, 2009 at 10:53 a.m. (7:53 p.m. Hawaii time); within three minutes of sending the e-mail to Janice Okubo at the HDOH, the following response was received:
Okubo, Janice S.
Subject: Request for Disclosure; attention required
Sent: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:53:39 -1000
was read on Tue, 5 May 2009 07:56:33 -1000
The requested documents have yet to arrive, nor any explanation of why they haven't. The original request for disclosure was made two months, on March 14, 2009 by letter to the HDOH.
Of course, the birth certificate issue is only part of AKA's problem with regards to his usurpation of the Oval Office, his illegal occupation of the White House.
AKA has, himself, claimed that he was, at birth, a dual citizen, American by virtue of his mother; British by virtue of his father. This would only be possible if he was born in Hawaii and there is no proof that he was. If he was born in Kenya, as his step-grandmother has claimed before witnesses, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was not old enough to confer her American citizenship to her son, which means he was, at birth, a British subject. Beyond this, under the British Nationality Act of 1948 which extended to the British colony of Kenya, the child of a British subject, no matter where born, is a British subject. That means Obama was, at birth, a British subject no matter whether born in Hawaii or born in Kenya.
There is also the matter of his adoption by Lolo Soetoro following his marriage to Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) and the moving of the family to Jakarta, Indonesia where AKA was registered at the Fransiskus Asssisi Primary School as Barry Soetoro, his father listed as Lolo Seotoro, and his citizenship listed as Indonesian. By his own admission, in 1981, at the age of 20, Barry Soetoro traveled to Indonesia and Pakistan. He could not have traveled on an American passport to Pakistan at that time which means he traveled on a foreign passport (probably Indonesian, possibly British or Kenyan).
This means that Barry Soetoro, at the age of 18, did not reclaim his American citizenship (if he had a right to) as required, and could only be, at best, an naturalized U.S. citizen, precluding him from eligibility under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution. There is no proof that he is even a naturalized U.S. citizen which means he is an illegal alien usurping the Oval Office, occupying the White House.
In sum total, all records regarding AKA have disappeared or been sealed, including his birth certificate. While HDOH claims that his birth certificate is not sealed, a recent venture to the HDOH, requesting a copy brought forth the response that it had been sealed. Quite obviously Governor Linda Lingle, having denied such to be the case, forgot to tell the HDOH that they weren't supposed to disclose that information.
Follows all the records on AKA that have disappeared/been sealed:
Hawaii vault copy of Certificate of Live Birth — Not available
Certification of Live Birth — Released – Counterfeit
Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not available
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not available
Soetoro adoption records — Not available
Fransiskus Assisi School — School application – Released, states his name as Barry Soetoro, his citizenship as Indonesia, his father as Lolo Soetoro. Authentic.
Punahou School records — Not available
Selective Service Registration — Released – Proven Counterfeit
Occidental College records — Not available
Passport (Pakistan) — Not available
Columbia College records — Not available
Columbia thesis — Not available
Harvard College records — Not available
Harvard Law Review articles — Maybe one (1), Not Signed
Baptism certificate — None
Medical records — Not available
Illinois State Senate records — Not available
Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost (All other Illinois state senators' records are intact)
Law practice client list — Not available
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
Interesting list of documents not available. If AKA is not a usurper to the Oval Office, is not illegally occupying the White House, why is he hiding all his records that would prove otherwise?
It is amazing the response of liberal socialists to this question. While they maintain that if you have nothing to hide, you should submit to a warrantless search of your vehicle on request, their response to this question regarding AKA is that even though he is president, he has a right to privacy.
Does he, however, have any more right to privacy than any other American?
When was the last time you, as an American, were required to show your birth certificate? As an American, one must produce a birth certificate to …
2. enter the military;
3. enter school;
4. get a driver license;
5. register to vote.
Even children joining the local soccer team have to produce a birth certificate; the real McCoy that is, not a forged/altered COLB.
It has been all over the alternative news lately, that people representing the U.S. government are going front door to front door, taking GPS (Global Positioning System) readings and asking occupants questions under the aegis of the coming 2010 decennial U.S. census.
The United States government wants this information on every individual living in the United States; further, the United States Government believes it has the right to this information on you, even though it has no constitutional right to engage in the activities it claims the information will be used for.
Of course, the United States government will tell you that this information is confidential and will not be shared with anyone.
But is that true? Only if you believe in fairy tales!
One look at the U.S. Government SPEEDE/ExPRESS manual should disabuse anyone of the notion that the information they provide the government is confidential; one look at SPEEDE/ExPRESS makes it obvious that the government is amassing personally identifiable dossiers (called dangans in communist countries) on every man, woman and child in the United States.
Every electronic record established by any government office, on any individual, will feed into that dossier!
In H.R. 1, provision was made to set up the electronic database of health records on every American citizen. Now why would the government want that information unless, of course, the government intends to decide what health care services a human resource (that's you) receives in accordance with your value to the government in output and conformity?
For years, various contractors have been data-basing personally identifiable information on every man, woman and child in the United States under SPEEDE/ExPRESS. The National Institutes of Health is one subcontractor; Boeing Computers is another; National Computer Systems is yet another.
For what purpose? Why would the government of a supposedly "free" people want that kind of information?
People want to believe that all the disparate databases established by government entities cannot interface with one another; cannot share information. They are dead wrong. Efforts have been under way for years now to interface government computers systems such that, at the stroke of a key, the government can have a complete dossier of all known information, personally identifiable, on any human resource (that's you): medical (inclusive of physical, mental, dental, optical), education, court and police, tax and property, military, employment, bank … you name it, they want (and intend to get) that information, even purchases made on membership cards such as Safeway and Costco use.
Recently, H.R. 20 passed the U.S. House of Representatives. That bill, if it passes the Senate and is signed into law by the Marxist in the White House, will require the mental screening of every new mother under the claim of addressing "postpartum depression." Remember that under H.R. 1, that mental health screen will go right straight to the United States government.
The government believes it has the right to know everything there is to know about you, whom they view as nothing more than a "human resource."
Why does the United States government want this information on you? Two reasons.
The first reason is control. Information that will allow them to control you, by coercion if necessary. Need medical care? You will only get it if it serves the government's interests. You speak out against the government? No medical care. Your death means one less resister!
The second reason has to do with the purpose of gathering that type of information on every "human resource". Under systems philosophy, the philosophy which under girds the Marxist state, this type data is essential to the leveraging of the "human" system to keep it in balance, to sustain and maintain the sustainable global environment, ie, the Marxist global environment. Systems philosophers believe that computers are, at this time, sophisticated enough to accurately analyze the volume of information needed to adequately and accurately leverage systems to keep them "in balance" That large quantity of information comes by way of what the government knows about you.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Remember Al Gore's book, Earth in Balance? That book is pure systems philosophy. Does that mean Al Gore is a Marxist? Just as much so as AKA, George W Bush, and the rest of the elitists in Washington, DC. For part two click below.
Click here for part -----> 2,
� 2009 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved
Activist and researcher, Stuter has spent the last fifteen years researching systems theory and systems philosophy with a particular emphasis on education as it pertains to achieving the sustainable global environment. She home schooled two daughters. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance, the sustainable global environment and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and a growing body of citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a participatory democracy. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: www.learn-usa.com