By Lynn Stuter
September 25, 2007
The first plank of the communist strategy for revolution confiscated in Dusseldorf, Germany in 1919 reads: “Corrupt the young. Get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.” (A)
In part one of “Moral Turpitude” I spoke of the molestation and rape of young children and the selling of young children into prostitution; the perpetrators of these heinous practices operate at the highest levels of our federal government where they coerce, corrupt and blackmail officials elected to represent the people of this nation, military professionals, and others who do business and rub elbows with the power structure that is Washington.
The Franklin Cover-up exposed the hidden activities of Larry King, Jr, a rising star in the Republican Party; the use of the Franklin Credit Union in Omaha, Nebraska as cover for a child pornography and prostitution ring servicing the power elite — oligarchs, if you will — in Washington, DC. (Note: an oligarchy is a form of government in which rule is by the few; the form of government now in existence in the United States.) The prostitution ring provided both male (i.e., homosexual) and female (i.e., heterosexual) prostitution activities.
One of King’s associates was a man by the name of Craig J Spence, a Washington lobbyist, supposedly conservative, known for his lavish “power cocktail” parties, with whom King had gone into business in DC procuring homosexual prostitutes whose services were offered to DC’s power elite — government officials, military officers, foreign and U.S. businessmen, lawyers, bankers, congressional aides, media representatives and other professionals following political events (s: Here in Reality). Investigators discovered cameras, two way mirrors, listening devices and various other paraphernalia in Spence’s DC mansion, used to record the perverse activities of DC’s power elite with children, male and female, for the purposes of blackmail. (s: “Power broker served drugs, sex at parties bugged for blackmail”; The Washington Times; June 30, 1989, page A1) As indicated by the title of the foresaid article, Spence also provided drugs at these parties. One victim of King’s child prostitution and pornography ring was one of the male prostitutes taken on a midnight tour of the White House on July 3, 1988 by Craig Spence who later claimed the tour was connected to high level Bush Administration (GHW Bush) officials.
Craig Spence supposedly committed suicide in his Ritz Carlton Hotel room in Boston on November 10, 1989. He was a practicing homosexual facing certain death from AIDS. He would state, in his final days, that the homosexual prostitution ring in which he and King were partners was a CIA front operation intended to blackmail high-ranking public officials (s: Here in Reality). The Larry King child prostitution and pornography ring also led to the CIA, the FBI, and local law enforcement in Omaha, Nebraska.
It would be discovered that Craig Spence was a client of Stephen Gobie, the homosexual call-boy lover of Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA). Gobie would claim that he used Frank’s apartment to run his homosexual and bisexual prostitution ring with Frank’s approval; which, of course, Frank denied. Nearby Chevy Chase Elementary School was used as the base of operations for Gobie who was allowed to use the telephone and sometimes sleep there, and was given unlimited access to the building by the principal, Gabriel Massaro, who utilized Gobie’s services.
Following Spence’s death, the DC call-boy scandal died a quiet death because of whom it involved. Claims were made that this was not the case but had it been a member of John Q Public involved instead of the rich and powerful, that individual or individuals would have found themselves behind bars, facing prosecution and the prospect of a long prison sentence. Quite obviously, in the land of the free and the home of the brave, it depends on who you are and how much money you have as to whether you will be prosecuted for crimes you commit; the new definition of equal justice under the law in the emerging American democracy (as opposed to a Constitutional Republic). Money and power has privilege even though such was never the intent of our Founding Fathers, is to be found nowhere in the Constitution, and is counter to the very intent of the Bill of Rights.
For more information regarding Larry King’s connection to the DC prostitution and pornography ring, get The Franklin Cover-up By John Decamp. Information on the net can be found here and here. More complete information on the Craig Spence/Stephen Gobie/Barney Frank scandal can be found here.
Recently, in conjunction with research into the scope of the sexual improprieties involving too many of the power elite in Washington, DC, this writer obtained a copy of Alan Stang’s new book, Not Holier than Thou; How Queer is Bush? (Patton House Publishers; Houston; 2007). A copy of the book may be obtained here. The book outlines, very succinctly, the sexual practices that define the homosexual; how homosexuals and their agenda permeate the once hallowed halls of our government in Washington, DC, naming names and providing proof; how homosexuals have taken over the Republican party unbeknownst to most Republican party members; how George W Bush, if not a homosexual himself (which has been proffered on more than one website concerning the Jeff Gannon/James Guckert controversy and the Bohemian Grove Club), is a “homosexualist,” defined as a heterosexual who promotes the homosexual agenda of forcing acceptance as normal of the deviant sexual practices that define the homosexual, including filling his administration and important positions with homosexuals.
Stang’s book also goes into the history of how homosexuality has been used, from time immemorial, to subvert societies and is being used in America today to promote the Marxist transformation of America. This book is a must read for any American trying to reclaim our American heritage.
In the mid-1990’s this writer was shocked when given a brochure handed out to children in a California school in which homosexuality was presented as normal and heterosexuality as abnormal, asking children how they would address this “problem.” Quite obviously, the intent was to inculcate in children the misguided claim that the sexual practices that make homosexuals just that, are normal. The fact that homosexuals very seldom live to old age, because the sexual practices in which they participate not only expose them to a myriad of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS, but also cause suppression of their immune system, was carefully concealed as was the purpose of the brochure itself: that homosexuality is almost exclusively a chosen lifestyle, not one a child is born with. Were such not the case, homosexuality would be seen as normal by society without the need for such claptrap.
And this claptrap, for that is what it is, is being taught to children in government schools across this nation in the name of diversity. If a parent were to expose a child to products used to manufacture methamphetamine, products that can kill, and the state found out about it as happened recently in a northern Washington town, the child would be removed from the home and placed in foster care. The parents would be arrested and deemed “unfit” to raise the child, as well they should be.
However, when a government school decides to teach children about the intricacies of the sexual acts which define a homosexual, as has happened in Massachusetts schools, and even though such practices lead more often than not to a slow, painful, premature death, the Federal District Court ruled that the school had an obligation, irrespective of the opposition of parents, to teach children about the intricacies of homosexual sex in the name of diversity in sexual orientation! (Alan Stang; Not Holier than Thou; page 117)
Quite obviously, common sense and moral decency have left the building. The message to parents could not be clearer: if you love your children, if you want to increase their chances of living a long, happy, productive life, you will get them out of the government schools. In 2004 a young man, shown in pictures on his website cross dressed in women’s clothes, committed suicide in the commons area of his high school. Knowing that the homosexual agenda is being taught in government schools across the nation, including this school, one has to question what role the school played in the confusion this young man displayed concerning his sexuality.
In the small town of White Salmon, Washington, not long after the advent of education reform in the early 90’s, parents were shocked to discover a homosexual teacher using sexually explicit material in her English Honors classroom. The teacher told students that she wanted to keep the subject matter between her and them; in other words, she told students not to tell their parents. When two students did tell their parents, those students were subjected to public ridicule by the teacher; the parents were subjected to public ridicule by the local newspaper; the school district administrators didn’t see anything wrong with using this type material in the classroom. The message was clear: the school is your family, your parents are a detriment to your family. The teacher was never disciplined but as the controversy grew, not only about this incident but about a continuing string of like incidents, the teacher resigned and moved to another state where she undoubtedly continued such practices.
The incidence of sexually explicit material, addressing both heterosexual and homosexual sexual activity, has grown exponentially under education reform with State Legislatures refusing to address the issue, claiming that curriculum development is a local issue when curriculum development must, under state law coalescing federal law, teach to the state exit outcomes.
As Alan Stang points out in his book, the homosexual agenda is being pushed, not only in schools, but in society in general by portraying homosexuals as victims when nothing could be further from the truth. The true victims are the people on whom the homosexual agenda has been forced by a government that forbids one to even speak ill of the perversion of homosexual sexual practices for fear of being prosecuted for “hate speech.” But nothing stops a debate of homosexuality faster than an explicit description of homosexual sexual practices. Not only is such repulsive to the normal mind, but repulsive if one has any sense of moral decency.
A “gay pride” parade this past July in San Diego is a prime example of homosexual turpitude. The homosexual female fire chief, Tracy Jarman, forced heterosexual male firemen to participate in the event, dressed in uniform, in their fire truck. They were subjected to morally repugnant behavior from homosexual parade participants who didn’t even have the self-respect of alley cats! Had heterosexuals displayed themselves in such fashion, mouthed such vulgarities, they would have found themselves in jail. Not so the homosexuals who were allowed to expose themselves to firemen and subject them to lewd, lascivious and suggestive utterances. To the best of my knowledge, the fire chief was neither fired nor disciplined. The firemen subjected to this display of homosexual depravity have sought legal recourse.
In the Massachusetts case, young children were taught the intricacies of “fisting”, a homosexual sexual practice so disgusting that a description of it here would be deemed pornographic. Yet that pornography was taught to young children with the approval of not only the government school but the federal court!
History is replete with what happens when a society either accepts or is forced to accept homosexuality as normal human behavior. And those who do not heed history are doomed to repeat it. In the days leading up to the fall of the Roman Empire homosexuality was rampant, moral decadence and depravity resulting therefrom also rampant.
The same is true with Nazi Germany. Hitler was homosexual along with many who served as his top aides, implementers and enforcers. Leading up to seizing power, Hitler courted the homosexual community, promising them equality under his rule. But once Hitler came to power, those homosexuals not within his inner circle were rounded up and exterminated.
The same happened under communism in the U.S.S.R.; the same will happen if the Marxists/Fascists get their way in America. If the homosexual activists believe otherwise, they do so at their own peril.
As I write this, a German government publication promotes incestuous pedophilia as healthy and normal. If homosexual sexual practices are viewed by Americans as healthy and normal, how long before incestuous pedophilia is also viewed as healthy and normal? How long before parent/child incest is considered healthy and normal? Man/boy incestuous relationships as normal has been the goal of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) for years. What’s the difference between this and the use of child male prostitutes to service the power elite in Washington DC? Is incest defined by who does it?
Decent Americans know that the sexual perversion so prevalent in American society today is one of the leading causes of the downfall, the degradation of our society, of our country. Why then do we continue to tolerate the immersion of our young people in it? Why do we continue to tolerate it in our society and among our elected? Why do we continue to be silent as the homosexual agenda of forced acceptance of unhealthy sexual perversion is shoved down our throats?
© 2007 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved
Mother and wife, Stuter has spent the past ten years researching systems theory with a particular emphasis on education. She home schooled two daughters, now grown and on their own. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: www.learn-usa.com
Americans who claim to be Christians today have walked away from their responsibility to partake and be involved in their government, leaving the void to be filled by people for whom our Constitution and Bill of Rights are wholly inadequate.