WHERE THE EVIDENCE LEADS
PART 2 of 2
By Lynn Stuter
July 17, 2007
Researchers would also discover a PNAC document, published in 2000, Rebuilding America�s Defenses; Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, page 51, in which it is suggested that a New Pearl Harbor is needed to galvanize the people of this nation behind a policy of American imperialist expansionism. PNAC members later showing up in the Bush Administration include Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Cohen, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and Lewis �Scooter� Libby. Jeb Bush, George Bush�s brother, is also a member along with such notables as Elliott Abrams, Gary Bauer, Midge Decker, Bill Bennett, Steve Forbes and Dan Quayle.
Seven short months after Bush took office just such an event occurred on September 11, 2001.
In March 2002 Bush invaded Iraq on the premise that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD�s) and was aiding and abetting al Qaeda. The first premise proved false; further, that Bush knew (Bush Sought �Way� to Invade Iraq, Secret US Plans for Iraq�s Oil, Bush Began Iraq Plan pre-911, What I didn�t find in Africa) it was false when he made the claim. The second premise got lost in the shadow of the first premise, along with the fact that there was no connection between Hussein and bin Laden. As the invasion went on, the premise changed from WMD�s to establishing a �free and democratic� Iraq.
Bush invaded Iraq because of September 11, 2001. But wait, there is not connection between Hussein and bin Laden, no connection between Hussein and September 11, 2001. So if Iraq isn�t about terrorists or the �war on terrorism�, what is Bush�s invasion of Iraq about?
What Americans aren�t being told concerning Iraq is that America is establishing a military presence there. The largest embassy complex in the world is being built in Baghdad; a number of American military bases have sprung up in Iraq. Does this sound like the machinations of a country intending to liberate Iraq then leave? As Mr Kraft pointed out in his article, a stable Iraq can be used as a launching platform for meddling in the affairs of other Middle East countries. Yesterday a British newspaper bore this headline: �Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran.�
If people from another country meddled in the affairs of the American people, would we like it? Of course not. Then why should we even entertain the idea that meddling in other countries is okay? But meddle we have, we are, and under false pretenses.
Was 9/11 and inside job? The evidence is pointing more and more that direction. The American people have been lead to believe that 9/11 was the work of foreign terrorists wielding box cutters who �hate our freedom�. But the evidence does not point in that direction. The evidence is pointing more and more to 9/11 being the work of home-grown terrorists (as defined by the Patriot Act) that now occupy the highest levels of our government and that 9/11 was intended to galvanize the America people behind the policies of imperialist expansionism, if only for just long enough to get the real agenda behind the events of 9/11 accomplished, just as Pearl Harbor galvanized the American people behind entering World War II.
And one of the most crucial aspects pointing to that does not even deal with the events of 9/11 but concerns what happened afterward. If 9/11 were truly the work of foreign terrorists with box cutters, the first action of George W Bush would have been to secure our borders, especially in light of his �war on terror.�
Has he done that? No he hasn�t. Why hasn�t he? That question leads us directly to the fact that George W Bush, as his father, is a proponent of One World Government, the New World Order (NWO) or One World Order (OWO). To that end, George W Bush has embarked, with the leaders of Canada and Mexico, in the establishment of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) in pursuit of the North American Union, dissolving the borders of America, dissolving the United States Constitution, and embarking on a new form of government without so much as a vote of the people.
His intentions are further supported by the fact that, while invading Iraq on the pretense of the �war on terror�, Bush�s answer to the invasion of America by 12 to 20,000,000 illegal aliens � criminals one and all � was to introduce two bills: S 1348 sponsored by Harry Reid, Edward Kennedy, Patrick Leahy, Robert Menendez and Ken Salazar, and S 1639 sponsored by Edward Kennedy and Arlen Specter � giving these invaders amnesty. Incongruous, you might conclude. Not at all. This is Bush in pursuit of the NWO/OWO agenda.
No government, pursuing a course of imperial expansionism (empire building) has ever withstood the test of time and America is, as Ron Paul has stated, on the verge of bankruptcy. That also falls right in line with NWO/OWO agenda for America. The depression that will result will make the one in �29 look like child�s play! People back then knew how to survive; the majority of people today don�t. Another NWO/OWO agenda � 80% world depopulation.
As for radical Islamic fundamentalists � while we definitely should not ignore the threat they pose, we have far more to fear, at this point in time, from George W Bush then we have to fear from radical Islamic fundamentalists. It is not radical Islamic fundamentalists who have weakened our country, our economy, and our military defense capability to the point of collapse; that has been the doing of George W Bush.
It is under the watch of George W Bush that
These actions by George W Bush have not been against radical Islamic fundamentalists, they have been against the American people. These are not the actions of someone trying to protect Americans or America; these are the actions of someone seeking to curb the rights of Americans in pursuit of an anti-American agenda.
I submit that if you do not oppose this war, you do not want to hold George W Bush accountable for the damage he has done to this nation, the crimes he has committed, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, will live under the Fascist/Communist ideology of the NWO/OWO that is so quickly overrunning our Constitutional Republic. Our enemy is not from without as those who support Bush�s war would have us believe, our enemy is within and Bush�s war is but a means of accomplishing evil ends.
And to those who say I am the enemy of America, I say this: I will stand shoulder to shoulder with any freedom-loving America in defense of our Constitutional Republic. At the same time, I will not stand idly by while the likes of George W Bush and his rogue band of swaggering neo-cons leads our nation astray through deceit, treachery and treason! Anyone who thinks George W Bush is out to protect this nation is expecting that the fox will guard the hen house.
This is not about Democrat or Republican; this is not about liberal or conservative; this is about the evidence, where that evidence leads, and what it means for the future of America. For part 1 click below.
Click here for part -----> 1,
� 2007 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved
Mother and wife, Stuter has spent the past ten years researching systems theory with a particular emphasis on education. She home schooled two daughters, now grown and on their own. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: www.learn-usa.com
And to those who say I am the enemy of America, I say this: I will stand shoulder to shoulder with any freedom-loving America in defense of our Constitutional Republic.