Additional Titles








The End of Saint Valentine's Day?

When Family Dissolution Becomes The Law of The Land

Woman's Birth-Right Under Attack by Fem-Socialists

The Grinches Who Would Steal Marriage










By Carey Roberts
October 27, 2005

The First Lady recently weighed in on the faltering support for Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers. Asked on NBCís Today show if sexism might be at the root of the criticisms of Miersí legal qualifications, Mrs. Bush coyly replied, ďI think thatís possible.Ē

Excuse me, but somehow that remark struck a nerve. Because every time a woman hits a hiccup in the long march for female emancipation, it seems that someone trots out the specter of knuckle-dragging males trying to send their womenfolk back to the Cuissinart.

If male sexism is rampant throughout the hinterlands, then why did the CWA -- the Concerned Women for America -- come out expressing wonderment that a woman who has never written a single article on constitutional law is now being considered for the high court? [Read] Are the CWA members male cross-dressers who have failed to connect with their inner femininity?

But now that Laura Bush has raised the issue of sexism, maybe itís time to turn the spotlight in the other direction.

Donít get me wrong, Mrs. Bush. I have a great love for books and a high regard for teachers and librarians.

But during last yearís presidential campaign, you seemed to revel in jokes at your husbandís expense. Remember that story about George stretching out his feet on the living room table, and Barbara ordered him to put them down? That one brought down the house -- but somehow I canít imagine Bill regaling audiences about the time he ordered Hillary to remove her pantyhose from the shower stall.

And then at last Aprilís White House Correspondentsí Dinner, it seems you ordered the Commander-in-Chief to sit down so you could crack crude jokes about you and other well-appointed ladies waving greenbacks at male strippers.

Sexist? Probably not, but certainly in bad taste.

Then there were your high-profile efforts to promote the rights of women in Afghanistan. Of course thatís important and good. But when you paid that visit to the Women's Teacher Training Institute in Kabul, were you mindful of the arrests, torture, and executions that the Taliban had visited on many thousands of innocent civilian men?

Somehow it doesnít make sense to call attention to the right of girls to get an education, but ignore the right of defenseless men to not be pulled out of their homes in the middle of the night, never to be heard from again.

This past July you gave a speech in South Africa that decried violence against women. [Read] But what about violence against men? Surely one of your advisors warned you that the domestic violence issue has become distorted by the rad-fems whose aim is to convince women that they live under the constant threat of being brutalized by their husbands and boyfriends. [Read]

Then thereís your gender health initiative.

As you know, the health of men is in pretty sad shape these days. Men die an average of five years before women. As a result, elderly widows soon end up in a nursing home, left to wonder how things might have turned out differently.

When they find out those facts, most women I know say, ďWhat can I do to improve the health of men, and especially the men in my life?Ē

But instead, you opted to promote your Womenís Health and Wellness Initiative. [Read]

Even more mind-boggling is your endorsement of the Heart Truth, the womenís heart disease awareness program that features fashion queens in showy red dresses. [Read]

Itís well-known that men have a far higher risk of dying from heart disease than women. [Read] Just last week I heard about a local man Ė a husband, a breadwinner, and father of three -- in his 40s who just had a triple coronary bypass operation.

But you donít hear about women that age with life-threatening heart disease. Thatís because heart disease is a disease that affects older women.

Although no doubt well-intentioned, your womenís health program carries a message that is demeaning to fair-minded men and women alike: menís medical necessities command less social priority than womenís fashion statements.

Maybe your flirtation with radical feminism wouldnít be so bad, Mrs. Bush, except for the fact that you showcase these programs as examples of Enlightened Womanhood. Caring and intelligent women everywhere happen to think otherwise.

© 2005 Carey Roberts - All Rights Reserved

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work was an exposť on Marxism and radical feminism. Mr. Robertsí work has been cited on the Rush Limbaugh show.

Besides serving as a regular contributor to, he has published in The Washington Times,,,, Menís News Daily,, The Federal Observer, Opinion Editorials, and The Right Report.

Previously, he served on active duty in the Army, was a professor of psychology, and was a citizen-lobbyist in the US Congress. In his spare time he admires Norman Rockwell paintings, collects antiques, and is an avid soccer fan. He now works as an independent researcher and consultant.

Roberts now works as an independent lecturer, writer, and consultant.










As you know, the health of men is in pretty sad shape these days.