ACRONYMS, AFGHANISTAN & THE NEW WORLD SOCIETY
PART 1 of 2

 

 

 

Dr. Eugene Narrett, Ph.D
September 29, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

 

An acronym is a neologism, a new word formed of the first letters of a series of words. For example, UNESCO is the acronym of the “United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization;” its first Director, Sir Julian Huxley, wrote a book, UNESCO, its Purpose and Philosophy (Washington, 1947) whose principles have shaped our lives and helped create a world state.

Huxley believed fervently in evolution and the ability to foster it socially by applying “the thesis, antithesis, synthesis of Hegelian philosophy and the Marxist reconciliation of opposites based on it.” He wrote that “dialectical materialism was the first radical attempt at an evolutionary philosophy” (ibid). Sir Julian’s grandfather, publicist Thomas Henry Huxley was instrumental in turning Darwin’s theory into a dogma.

Sir Julian argued that the Hegelian-Marxist dialectic of fusion by conflict “must be a mass philosophy, a mass creed” that relies on modern media to “overcome the resistance of millions to desirable change” which for him meant accepting “international education as a function of a world society” (ibid. 29). The media and schools are to be “the mechanisms for world unification,” he wrote, “the means to blend “individualism and collectivism, capitalism and communism, Christianity and Marxism, the American and the Russian ways of life” (ibid. 61). “Through the inexorable dialectic of evolution,” he wrote, this dialectic fusion of opposites into a world society, “must happen.”

The Great Depression and the “Alphabet Soup” of Federal Agencies, as our history books soothingly called them familiarized us with acronyms for vast government agencies that would “save” us from poverty much as AFDC (“welfare”) served the family, deforming it along lines set forth by Marx and Comte. For sixty years, the United Nations, helped by the media, has continued this process of bureaucratic gigantism and media promotion, “techniques of persuasion, information and true propaganda” as Huxley wrote (ibid. 60).

WUFA is one of the growing mass of stealth groups and acronyms that more and more circumscribe our thoughts, discourse and deeds. WUFA is the “World Federation of United Nations Associations” one of which is UNA-USA the United Nations Association of the United States of America. They publish the Global Citizen a magazine for school teachers and students that is carrying forward Julian Huxley’s mission. They also offer a text, the Economies of Globalization “that can be used as a full-length, standards-based curriculum unit in high school classrooms” (www.unausa.org).

The world state has various power nodes; it is an immense work in progress at several sites worldwide, the formation of the NAU and its integration with China being but one. Thus the EU has its own RBIT (“rapid border intervention teams”). I got thinking about acronyms and “global citizens” when I decided to check how many nations had troops in Afghanistan. It’s not just or even mainly about military battles but about forging a new world and new age in which thinking and relating, a la 1984 will proceed more and more by impersonal acronyms, group think, slogans and mantras; “when there will be a fusing of the problem [of separation] in one vast humanitarian situation” [1], a World State.

In seeking troop levels I learned about ISAF, UNAMA, UNSC, NAC, SCR, PRT and the links that bind them. The rulers of the organizations these acronyms mask are building something in Afghanistan that has a lot to do with Huxley’s vision as articulated by Kofi Anan when he stated that “the Security Council is the Managing Committee of our fledgling global security state” (12-11-06).

Some decades ago our diplomatic and intelligence services worked with Pakistan to set up the Taliban and Mujahideen to drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, the center of the World Island as Halford Mackinder termed the Eastern Hemisphere. Then UBL began to help Western leaders “overcome the resistance of millions to desirable change” by going in the ancient way of jihad. Since then our leaders have been building new alliances and management structures under the rubric of OPE, “Operation Enduring Freedom” initiated at conferences in Bonn in fall 2001, producing UNSC resolutions 1368 and 1373 to support global re-organization of Afghanistan, a paradigm, as was the former Yugoslavia in the 1990’s for re-organizing the world. Bonn is noteworthy as a center of NATO action because of the rising profile of Germany within and beyond the EU.

The “ISAF operates in Afghanistan under a UN mandate and will continue to operate according to current and future UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions” it says at www.nato.int/issues/afghanistan (July 2007). UNSC Resolution 1510 “opened the way to a wider role for ISAF to support the government of Afghanistan beyond Kabul.”

Mr. Anan’s quote becomes more comprehensible when one learns that ISAF means “International Security Assistance Force” and it “works closely with the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan” (UNAMA). Both are coordinated by NAC, the North Atlantic Council, “NATO’s highest decision-making body” that operates from SHAPE in Mons, Belgium. So the “world community’s” enforcement arm is NATO directed by NAC; conversely, the UNSC (including Russia) legitimizes the operations of SHAPE – NATO.

An ongoing lesson is being passed to everyone who’s paying attention which hopefully includes citizens of this imperiled Constitutional Republic.

Hikmet Cetin of Turkey is the SCR, “Senior Civilian Representative” for NATO in Afghanistan and he liaises closely with them, the UNSC and locals. Since the late 19th century Turkey has been the geographic, political and military path for Germany to extend its influence to the Middle East for example, in the Berlin to Baghdad railway.

So the NAC directs NATO which gets its imprimatur from UNSC for the deployment of ISAF in the center of the world island. Hopefully, this will cause freedom to endure.

In addition to 15,000 American and 7500 British troops, the web site above noted that thirty-six NATO nations and nine partner nations have troops in Afghanistan via ISAF which has 34,000 personnel in all. One fourth of the troops are Germans; about an eighth, Canadians. Other states with significant forces in ISAF are Turkey, France, Belgium, Spain, Italy, the UK, Norway and the Netherlands. The site notes the “German-led establishment of the first NATO PRT (“provincial reconstruction team”), one of many now re-organizing Afghanistan. Hopefully such means will not be needed for freedom to endure in NAC nations whose peoples have many concerns about “international education,” “world society” and “absorption” in regional groupings accomplished by an alphabet-soup of private-public partnerships, teams of international investors, law firms and holding companies.

It’s a small world after all.

An interesting feature of acronym-world is increasing German power projection planned since at least 1942 (C. Riess, 1944). German naval forces have been active in and around Africa and the Mediterranean. They are sharing their most advanced nuclear submarine technology with Algerian officers and engineers. They have been guarding oil wells and refineries in Nigeria, taken a leading role in training and equipping Nigerian armed forces, lobbying in the UN for them to intervene in Sudan. They also train South African forces, patrol by Port Sudan where China loads much of its oil, and off the coast of Israel and Lebanon.

This activity extends to the Middle East. Professors, financiers, and statesmen like Siegfried Martsch and Dr. Michael Wolfssohn at the Bundeswehr Academy in Munich support increasing independence for the nascent Kurdish State under Masoud Barzani. Germany permits Kurdish recruiting on its land and, noting that almost half of Iranians are not Persian Wolfssohn argues for breaking up Iran, “this politically unstable situation should and could change” and redesigning the Middle East on ethnic lines (www.german-foreign-policy.com). An ethnically homogenous Kurdistan, including areas in Syria, northwestern Iran and perhaps Turkey is reportedly favored by USA and German policy makers. Kurds are said to be fighting several hundred Iranian troops within Iran even as Iranians move into southern “Iraq” with its Shiite majority as the British coincidentally withdraw (“A Dirty Little Secret,” Neue Staaten interview with Dr. Pierre Hilliard; also, Die Zerrissenheit des Iran; Die Welt, July 03, 2007).

Momentous events are also occurring in Europe. By mid 2008, the EU plans to divide England into nine administrative districts; shires and autonomous local government will be gone as will England itself, per 1984. Parliament is buried in 110,000 EU administrative directives much as America is being done-in by Presidential Directives.

The directive role of the North Atlantic Council indicates the dominant role of NATO and the troop deployments in Afghanistan and elsewhere and the EU’s resurgence in concert with the USA. How then to explain culturally suicidal policies like that of Germany’s Ministry of Family Affairs, as reported by James Kouri, that encourages fathers to sexually massage the genitals of their 1-3 year old daughters and mothers, presumably to do the same for little boys. “Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters,” states the booklet, making insanity and crime sound hygienic and essential. The father’s “caresses too seldom pertain to these regions though this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex.”

This is alarming and mad, what a second Clinton administration might be. This propaganda will produce sex-phobic and auto-erotic young people. One would think that the 1.2 children per woman birth rate of the Germans is low enough for their eugenicists. The sexual deviance that pervaded German society and ruling elites from the Knight Templars to the courts of Frederick the Great, Kaiser Wilhelm, Weimar and the Third Reich is back as New Age “esteem.” As Samuel Igra detailed in The Poisoned Stream (1945), quoted extensively by Scott Lively and K. Abrams in The Pink Swastika (1997, 2nd edition) pederasty seems deeply engrained in Teutonic culture as Tacitus mentioned nineteen centuries ago (On the Germans). The current promoters of “the Elder Faith” of the “Dragon Kings and Grail Queens” provide mythic and, they would say, moral rationales for such medieval and Gothic agendas (L. Gardner and N. de Vere); so did Ariosophists like List, Lanz, and Wiliger. Perhaps the suicide of England partly reflects the tastes of its German ruling families since 1688. For part two click below.

Click here for part -----> 2,

© 2007 Eugene Narrett - All Rights Reserved