didn’t take long after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution
and Bill of Rights in 1787 before Jefferson would realize just how insidious
and dangerous the judiciary would become -- That all of the Founders
work to create and protect the Charters of Freedom for all posterity
would soon be destroyed from within via an elite oligarchy known as
it is no exaggeration to proclaim that true justice no longer exists
in the United States. The government body created for the sole purpose
of protecting and preserving freedom and liberty, upholding the Charters
of Freedom as the Supreme Law of the Land, is the most insidiously corrupt
and dangerous institution in America.
current usurpations emanating from the Executive Branch and unconstitutional
legislative acts by Congress could not persist without a corrupt Judicial
Branch. Contrary to modern misrepresentations of law and history, the
Founders created three co-equal branches of federal government, each
with oversight and restraint powers over the other and all of them accountable
to the States and the People of the United States.
the three branches act as one, all in opposition to the States and the
People, each providing a cloak of cover under which they all destroy
the Charters of Freedom from within the halls of our own government,
the most dangerous of them, the judiciary.
Jefferson realized soon after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution,
they had failed to tie the hands of the judiciary, preventing lawyers
and judges with personal and political agendas from subverting the Constitutional
Republic from the bench via precedent setting, broad ungrounded interpretations,
new definitions of old language and court procedures designed to protect
the evil cabal by denying public access to true justice.
Charters of Freedom are literally hanging by a thread today!
judiciary has become the most dangerous enemy of the Constitutional
Republic and although the Executive Dictatorship and tyrannical Legislative
body run close behind, it is the judiciary which must be reclaimed by
the people first, or there is no peaceful forum within which to hold
the other two branches accountable.
I can write a book on literally thousands of cases of totally lawless
injustice taking place across America today, I have chosen only a few
examples for this piece. These cases demonstrate just how lawless our
entire judiciary has become. As you will see, there is quite literally
nothing within our judicial system worthy of salvation. The corruption
reaches from the U.S. Supreme Court all the way down to your local traffic
court, and exists at all points in between.
Divorce Courts across this country are being run by corrupt Judges
like West Virginia Judge William Watkins, using the power of their bench
to intimidate, threaten and incarcerate for personal reasons. Watch
that video! This is not an isolated behavior from the bench…
on the High Court
is no longer a secret to any informed person on earth that Barack Hussein
Obama is not who he claims to be. It has been proven beyond any doubt
that Obama issued three forged birth certifications (not birth certificates)
for Hawaii in an effort to squash charges that he is ineligible for
the office he holds, not a Natural Born Citizen under Article II. Where
he was born is not even at issue. Who
his Father is determines his Natural Born birth rights.
Hussein Obama is in fact an imposter of unknown origin, illegally holding
the office of President at present, all made possible by the corrupt
Supreme Court that issued the oath of office to a known anti-American
imposter and continuing to protect Obama still today. The court has
refused to hear evidence regarding the imposter Obama on numerous occasions,
knowing very well that we have an unconstitutional imposter in the people’s
Oval Office. But there is much more…
High Court was asked a simple YES or NO question regarding ObamaCare,
is it Constitutional or not. Instead of performing its sole function
of answering this simple fundamental question in the preservation of
Constitutional Law, the court chose to assume the political position
of legislative branch, altering and upholding a law that is blatantly
unconstitutional on its face and in its entirety.
High Court was asked the same YES or NO question regarding Arizona’s
right to protect its sovereignty and security by enforcing standing
immigration laws, is it constitutional? Once again, instead of answering
that simple fundamental question, the court decided to play legislator,
parsing the Arizona law to the liking of the Obama White House, which
is standing down on enforcement of our immigration laws and even issuing
amnesty by Executive order only days before the courts Arizona ruling.
Obama has no such executive authority, but who is stopping him?
High Court was asked whether or not a hundred-year-old Montana law preventing
corporate corruption in state campaign funding was constitutional. The
court struck down the hundred-year-old Montana law governing state election
practices, an area of no jurisdiction or obvious interest for the Supreme
total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the Rule of Law is present
in the highest court in our land. This simply cannot stand…
in Lower Courts
a hundred cases have been brought in various local, state, district,
military and federal courts attempting to present a mountain of evidence
against imposter Barack Hussein Obama, all of them dismissed at the
door, refusing to hear any evidence, denying the people access to a
peaceful forum in which to fully expose the greatest fraud ever perpetrated
on the American people. No wonder the courts have been fitted with metal
detectors and armed guards to protect these judges from the people.
most recent copy-n-paste Obama dismissal came from Circuit
Court Judge Terrance P. Lewis in Tallahassee Florida. Judge Lewis
dismissed the case on the bases that Barack Hussein Obama, the current
occupant of the White House and presumed Democrat nominee for the 2012
election cycle running uncontested in Florida, is not yet officially
the DNC nominee, and therefore, cannot yet be challenged on his eligibility
for the office which he seeks re-election.
addition, Judge Lewis, upon hearing no evidence at all, declared the
following in his dismissal
with prejudice –
such stated rulings have ever happened. Yet, like several other judges,
Lewis attempts to establish via precedent setting, the notion that “anchor
baby” (anyone born on U.S. soil) is the proper definition of Natural
Born Citizen of the United States, a claim which is laughable on its
face. These judges are simply re-writing Article II of the U.S. Constitution
from the bench while flatly refusing to hear any evidence at all on
the matter from the people or the states.
no less than eight occasions leading up to the swearing in of Barack
Hussein Obama, members of congress
attempted and failed to alter or abolish the Natural Born Citizen
clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution. But these judges are
altering and abolishing Article II requirements from the bench, using
the settled definition of “citizen” to define “Natural
Born Citizen” as if there is no difference between true Natural
Born Citizens as defined by the Founders and Vattel, and anchor
baby, defined by 14th Amendment immigration and naturalization statutes.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
another front, the story of Retired
Navy Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick began back in 2009 when Fitzpatrick
attempted to deliver evidence against imposter Barack Hussein Obama
to his local Tennessee Grand Jury, a practice allowed by Tennessee law
but not by the terminally corrupt Monroe County system.
course, Fitzpatrick was denied access to deliver that evidence to the
sitting Grand Jury of Monroe County Tennessee in 2009 and has since
uncovered massive systemic corruption, fraud and abuse of power running
wild in Monroe County Tennessee, a condition which now exists in nearly
every county in the country.
has since proven that the Monroe County Grand Jury was illegally convened
for more than twenty-years and remains illegally convened today despite
getting Gary Pettway removed from his life-long career as jury foreman,
a condition that could not legally exist under Tennessee law, but does
exist across Tennessee.
has been arrested, had his home and property destroyed and confiscated,
incarcerated five times, beaten by Monroe County Sherriff’s and
falsely labeled a crackpot, a sovereign citizen, a violent potential
domestic terrorist and worse.
week, Fitzpatrick attended a hearing on motions for new charges accusing
him of tampering with and stealing official government documents. He
picked up an information packet for new jurors found on a table at the
court house and took it home to study jury procedures. I remind readers
that every court house is the property of the people, as is every court
Monroe County SWAT hit his home with force again that night, seizing
Fitzpatrick’s property and effects, arresting, brutalizing and
incarcerating Fitzpatrick again.
hearing on motions last week provided another look at the runaway judiciary.
Fitzpatrick presented evidence in his motions that the indictments against
him were forged. The judge denied discovery to uncover who actually
signed the indictments against him since the person named on the indictment
did not sign the documents.
presented hard evidence that the Monroe County juries remain illegally
convened, a fact which both the judge and the prosecutor had no choice
but to admit in open court. However, the judge set trial for September,
stating that they do things their own way in Monroe County and are in
no way obligated to follow Tennessee law. They can essentially do whatever
they want and Monroe County justice has been doing exactly that for
will once again face an unknown accuser, based upon a forged indictment,
before an illegally convened jury and a judge who couldn’t care
less. Of course the case will proceed…
in Your Local Traffic Court
for my personal story of crime and corruption at the lowest levels…
the way to drop my sick dog at the vet and the kids at school one morning,
I made a “legal” vehicular maneuver, cutting to the right
of backed up traffic, emergency lights on, remaining on the road at
approximately 5 MPH to turn into the veterinarians office and get my
dog out of the car, stopping him from vomiting all over the back of
local officer was waiting in the backed up traffic, I saw him and he
saw me. He followed me into the vet’s lot and proceeded to give
me a traffic ticket for making a “legal movement” in the
amount of $165.00
few days later, I called the court to inquire about my options. I was
told that the ticket was for a $5.00 fine and $160 court costs. I logically
asked if I could simply pay the $5.00 fine and pass on taking up the
court’s time, even though I was charged with making “a legal
turn.” The court clerk advised that I owed court costs whether
I appeared in court or not, so I might as well appear and fight the
ticket. Astonished by what I had just learned, I agreed to appear in
court, the ticketing officer presented his version of the story, perjuring
himself with blatant lies as if he didn’t even remember the incident.
He showed his dash-cam video of me making a “legal turn.”
The judge then read Tennessee statute confirming that the type of maneuver,
clearly seen on the dash-cam, was indeed “legal” according
to Tennessee law.
then, the judge found me guilty of making a “legal turn”
and fined me $5.00 plus $160 court costs. I owed the city $165.00 for
making a “legal” turn. When I asked the judge how this could
be, he became notably frustrated. He said it was his opinion that I
did not make the “legal turn” safely.
Note that the judge, now a witness, was not present at the incident.
the judge explained, “Just because I can drive down the highway
at 100 MPH without wrecking does not mean I did it safely….”
-- To which I reminded the judge that there are laws against driving
down the highway at 100 MPH. The judge slammed his gavel, and I paid
the city $165.00 for making a “legal” turn.
learned…. Judges are free to make up their own laws on the spot.
They do NOT have to follow the law, or the Constitution, or the Bill
of Rights or anything else. They are free to arrest, charge, fine and
incarcerate anyone for any reason at all, usually motivated by money
or politics. Jefferson’s fears had come full circle at even the
lowest levels of the judiciary.
to current government documents, there are approximately 874 Article
III appointed judges in the United States at present and best I can
tell, not one of them worth saving. Nine on the Supreme Court, 179 on
the courts of appeals, 9 on the court of international trade and 677
for the district courts.
Article III judges are directly engaged in injustice, the subversion
of the U.S. Constitution and Rule of Law and none of the destruction
happening to our once great nation could happen without these 874 judicial
of you, who think the problem can be solved by any future election,
fail to grasp the full gravity, the depth and breadth of the situation.
Note that both Reagan and Bush appointed Supreme
Court justices who later acted against the Constitution, just like
the Democrat appointed justices. Further…
is the judiciary which started dismantling the U.S. Charters of Freedom
before the ink was dry on those documents and they have been destroying
our Constitutional Republic every day since, via precedent.
the lawyer, the judge and most of all, the self-proclaimed “constitutional
scholar…” for it is they who have worked around the clock
to destroy the Constitutional Republic, raising themselves up as an
unchecked oligarchy free to rule over the people in all matters large
the American Bar Association, the leftist labor union of the legal system,
which accounts for about 40% of our nation’s lawyers and 99% of
the so-called constitutional think tanks that now spew the same anti-American
subversive lies spewed by our illegal administration and corrupted legislature
Foundation, Eagle Forum and Wall
Builders, all of whom are selling the lies that States lost their
rights in the Civil War and that anchor
baby is Natural Born Citizen. Once again, Jefferson has been proven
right, more a visionary than Nostradamus.
a letter to Mr. Jarvis dated September 1820, Jefferson wrote –
seem to consider the judges the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional
questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place
us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges … and their
power [are] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and
are not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective
control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing
that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and
party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all
the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves ….
When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally,
they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The
exemption of the judges from that is quite dangerous enough. I know
of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the