September 18, 2013
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." —Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991
Let's just say, for the sake of argument that we decided to become the Supreme Leader of planet Earth without military action. How would we go about it? The first thing we would do is to work towards controlling all of the resources of the Earth. We would take control of all the land, water, crude oil, natural gas, gemstones, minerals, precious metals and food production. The second thing we would do would be to control the worldwide money supply. The third thing we would do is to take over the management of all transportation, energy production and distribution, public education and finally we would take over the management of health care.
These words flow easily on paper, but the implementation of these goals is another matter altogether. The people would resist ..... or would they? The implementation of such a plan would be far easier than most people think. In fact, this very same plan has been underway for several decades.
As a rule, most people tend to think of a democratic government as benevolent, but the very opposite is true. (can anyone say "IRS"?) The real rule is that, individuals and entities with power always tend to work towards increasing their power. (can anyone say "Wilson", "FDR", “Nixon”, "Clinton" or "Obama"?) The only thing that will hold powerful individuals and entities in check are the people themselves, that is if they are even aware that government's power is increasing and have the courage to confront the rising power.
But alas, most people are docile and will not confront the ever-growing power of government, in the hopes of avoiding personal conflict, or disrupting their lives. The masses simply bend farther and farther away from individual freedom, in search of security, safety and avoiding conflict. Even worse, the masses are easily susceptible to propaganda, distortions, hype and lies emanating from government, or from special interest groups that manipulate government. (Think central bankers, industrialists, socialists and radical environmentalists) The masses today simply do not have an understanding of what the nebulous concept of individual freedom means and continue to lean more and more towards dependency on government for their perception of security and sustenance.
Given this knowledge of the masses, how could we conquer the planet without firing a shot? Our plan of action would include the elements contained in an ideology that incorporates one or more villains and collective guilt. We would create and promote two villains. The first villain would be implemented through class warfare where the poor are pitted against the rich and the rich are the villains. To equalize this perceived inequality we would promote the concept of SOCIAL JUSTICE, or "SJ", where government would, by force of law, re-distribute the wealth to the masses. (It's called theft by any other name) The implementation of this concept would trigger millions of votes for those that do the re-distribution and keep the re-distributors in power.
The second villain would be the people themselves for harming the planet through environmental degradation. To counter this villain we would promote radical environmentalism, or "RE", wherein we would pass laws to restrict actions by the masses that would allegedly harm the planet. (Think Agenda 21, adopted by the United Nations at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and signed by President George Herbert Walker Bush for the United States. Think President Clinton's Executive Order that created the President's Council on Sustainable Development, a UN policy. There was no treaty debated and ratified for these policies by the U. S. Congress, as required by the Constitution.)
In order to implement both "SJ" and "RE" we would instill in the people, through propaganda and outright lies, (think man-caused global warming) a deep sense of collective guilt for allowing planet-wide inequality and environmental degradation to happen, thus preparing them for the coming restrictions to their livelihoods, increased taxes, rising costs and the intrusion of government into their private lives for the alleged benefit of mankind, the children and mother Earth.
To solve this alleged worldwide injustice, we would promote world government (the One-World-Order or "OWO") so that we could control the people of the entire planet by implementing universal SOCIAL JUSTICE (wealth redistribution) and RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM (cap and trade and more wealth redistribution from rich countries to poor countries.) Our propaganda would include phrases like "these necessary actions are for your own good, for the children and for the good of the planet." How can the people be against these noble goals?
We would tell the masses that the land belongs to everyone and it was never meant to be owned by an individual, family, or a private organization. Only the government should be the ultimate controller of the land. In fact, at a United Nations Conference on Human Settlements held in Vancouver, BC Canada in 1976, the policy paper that resulted from the Conference contained a section just labeled "LAND". In the preamble of that section they wrote this:
"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice. If unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...."
SIDEBAR: Nicolea Ceausescu, 20th Century Dictator or Romania (circa 1989), drove the farmers and ranchers off their land so that he could control farm production. He knew that if he controlled the food, he could control the people. Prior to their execution in the revolution he caused, Nicolea and his wife visited both China and North Korea. Nicolea was impressed by the methods used in North Korea to control the people and upon returning to Romania, instituted some of the same measures. Knowing that independent life styles, like farming and ranching, fostered independent thinking, thoughts of freedom, new ideas and perhaps designs of revolution, he confiscated all land in Romania, ordered the people off their lands and forced them into apartments or tenements in the large cities to work for the government in the cities and on the farms as slave labor. That’s right, apartments!!! Nicolea had thousands of new apartment units built in the cities for this purpose. Does any of this sound familiar? This is precisely the plan of UN’s Agenda 21, drive everyone off the land and into the big cities where they can be more easily controlled .... in the names of social justice and radical environmentalism.
To facilitate the propaganda of SOCIAL JUSTICE (SJ) and RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM (RE) we would include these concepts and policies in the curriculum of the public education system. (Think "Common Core State Standards", "No Child Left Behind" and "Race To the Top", in the federal government's goal of top-down control of education by so-called education experts. We just received a report that under Common Core State Standards, 4th graders in a Louisiana classroom are being taught "ebonics", "pimps" and "mobtaz". These are hardly words or subjects to be taught to any class, much less 4th Graders.)
Behind the scenes and playing on the collective guilt of the masses, we would set about to control the land; (Agenda 21, sustainable development, smart growth and draconian land use and environmental regulations), the energy; (move towards inefficient wind and solar and institute the Smart Grid concept), we would control commerce and the economy through an egregious expansion of the "Commerce Clause" in the Constitution and voluminous regulations on everything; we would take over the health care of all the people by nationalizing the health care system; (in the US, think Obama Care. Europe, Canada and Australia already have socialized medicine) and we would merge the world money supply into the world's central banks and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The central banks (think Federal Reserve) would engage in printing money and quantitative easing (buying up government bonds) in order to keep the lid on an unstable worldwide currency (unstable because of government profligate spending on social justice and radical environmentalism) and to keep the equity markets from crashing. The unknown result of printing money is a hidden tax on the people called inflation.
We then would incorporate SOCIAL JUSTICE, RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM and the ONE WORLD ORDER into a world policy to be controlled by an oligarchy of bankers, influential industrialists, environmentalists, socialists and powerful politicians. Organizations would be created, some secret, some not, to establish policy and facilitate the world agenda. These organizations would be called the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral and Bildeberg groups, all aided and abetted by the Intelligence Community. (Think CIA)
We would then retain some sociology professors in academia to conduct studies on how to control people through their subconscious minds. (President Herbert Hoover, back in the late 1920's, did just that and engaged Harvard and the University of Illinois to conduct the subconscious-mind studies and got the Rockefeller Foundation to pay for the studies. The results of those studies ended up in significant legislation and propaganda initiatives.)
So yes, ladies and gentlemen, we could take over the world and put the people in chains on a planet-wide scale, simply by implementing and enforcing through law the above described plan and controlling the movement of money. Hitler was almost successful in a similar plan but lost because he added military force to his plan of propaganda, stealth and deceit.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Unless the American people lose their docility and start confronting those that would enslave them, an oligarchy, using the above, plan could complete Hitler’s goals of world domination by creating villains and inducing collective guilt across the globe and they could accomplish it under 100 years. This is not a fantasy ladies and gentlemen, this is reality.
Not being one of the docile Americans we describe above, we are directly confronting government and more specifically the IRS in a full frontal assault. We encourage those who do not fear government to join our efforts by logging on to our new website at: www.attackwatchspies.com. The website contains a wealth of useful IRS information and our monthly newsletter, "The IRS Investigator", contains even more. The reader can review our current communication with the IRS entitled IRS C-RRR LETTER 2, on our website HERE.
Help us do our part in making the equation, "SJ + RE + OWO equal to Zero", not equal to "A Planet in Chains."
� 2013 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved
Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, "In Defense of Rural America", is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners. Mr. Ewart can be reached by e-mail for comment at email@example.com, or by 'phone at 1 800 682-7848.