June 29, 2015
While the aftershocks of last Friday's putrid "Supreme" Court earthquake ruling that sexual deviants (not 'gay') have a constitutional "right" to "dignity" and can get married are still rippling across this country, now is not the time to throw in the towel.
Yes, useful fools in the media are drooling and that includes mega FOX News star, Megyn Kelly. She has been a long time supporter of "rights" for sexual deviants. Why, Miss Megyn is loved by the sexual deviant crowd! As for FOX News, that network is not fair or balanced. Not on the issue of sexual deviants or what I and other writers on NewsWithViews write about: our disastrous monetary policy, Agenda 21, North American Union, returning to a limited form of republican (not the Republican party, for heaven's sake!) government, the push for one world government and the truth behind keeping black Americans on the plantation. And if anyone thinks FOX News Network isn't becoming more pro-sexual deviant, try this on for size:
Bret Baier Confirms Fox News Asked Him to Pull Out of Catholic Legatus Event "Update: in an email sent to a subscriber to AFTAH's e-newsletter, Bret Baier confirmed that his employer, Fox News, had asked him to pull out as a speaker at the Legatus summit. Baier said he agreed with the decision. Correction: we failed to note that Cardinal Timothy Dolan of the Archdiocese of New York joined Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal as among the original "big-name" speakers who did NOT pull out of the Legatus event."
While it greatly pained me, I caught some of Megyn Kelly's show last Friday evening. A clip of the plaintiff in the case talking about how much he loved a man. Kelly about swooned when she said, "How can yo deny that"? or words to that effect.
Well, Megyn, perhaps you might spend some time on your show talking about promoting HIV/AIDS and the dozens of 'lavender diseases' spread by homosexuals. Talk about their health problems like long term bowel movement sex causes them to wear diapers because they can no longer hold their bowels in check (Wait Gunny - I Have to Change My Diaper); don't forget some of them use what is called a 'butt plug". Sodomy is a national health issue in this country, yet supporters of sexual deviants and their dangerous lifestyles never is even hinted at.
As a matter of fact, if you're a doctor and bring up the subject, the PC fools out there in positions of power will try to destroy you:
Doc faces boot for citing 'gay' health dangers - 'This is almost a fascist effort at mind control'
"Dr. Paul Church, a veteran urologist who has been on the staff of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for nearly 30 years, is appealing a board decision against him, and is planning for a hearing in July on his fight over his right to warn people that the facts prove “gay” sex is a dangerous lifestyle. Church, who also is a member of the Harvard Medical School Facility and has conducted life-saving research on diagnosing bladder and prostate cancer, told WND, “It is incredible to think they would be able to silence me and revoke my ability to be on the staff as a result of my raising valid health concerns over a risky lifestyle.”
"He continued, “This is almost a fascist effort at mind control.” The facts, he said, are on his side. “Although it has declined over the past few decades, two-thirds of all new HIV/AIDS infections in the U.S. are the result of men having sex with men. Fifty percent of ‘gay’ men will be infected with HIV by age 50. Those numbers are out there and they are staggering,” he said. But the facts that Church has used, from the Centers for Disease Control, appear to matter little in the case, he suggested."
Here's a doctor who wants his patient to know that his decision to engage in bowel movement sex (let's not forget "fisting" where "lovers" shove their fist up each other's rectum to 'stretch the anus' for more "enjoyable" sex in each other's poop) has serious consequences and what happens? He's about to lose his job - just like too many Americans now driven out of business because of the vicious agenda of sexual deviants of all flavors. Let's not forget children adopted by sexual deviants which I consider child abuse:
I receive some of the most vile hate mail everytime I bring out facts about sexual deviants (having sex in each other's poop). What they don't understand is like the doctor above, I want homosexuals to live and not die a horrible death from AIDS or be forced to wear diapers like a baby or take a million pills to get rid of their diseases all caused by their personal behavior. I feel nothing but sorry for people who have bought into the propaganda they were "born that way". But, in today's decaying society, that's hate talk.
Nor do any of the money anchors on any of the networks talk about the scientific fact that sexual deviants are NOT born that way. Sexual deviants are not born that way like a person's skin color. Elton John was once married to a woman. If Elton John was "born that way" and had no choice in the matter and could only be attracted to men, he would never have married a woman. Dr. Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King cannot change the color of her skin anymore than I can mine.
Hidden camera: 'Gays' admit they're not 'born that way' - Documentary exposes sexual-orientation myth.
Dr. Ben Carson was eviscerated when he said people go into prison heterosexual and come out homosexual. The squawking was heard from coast to coast. Queer sex amongst prisoners across this country is very common. I was channel surfing one night at a hotel on the road and stopped on a documentary program about just that. Male and female prisoners both said loneliness was the biggest factor in having sexual relations with the same sex, but they weren't "gay". One woman said when she was released she was going home to her husband "who understood". Unfortunately, Carson also chanted the old propaganda he doesn't care about a person's sexual "orientation". Carson has also caved and said it's now the law.
For those who read the dissenting opinions, that toxic decision had nothing to do with the U.S. Constitution. NOTHING. It is judicial activism and judicial malfeasance at its worst. While I am shocked Chief Justice John Roberts didn't vote for it, something he said makes him a hypocrite:
Let's not forget this outrage: Justices Ginsburg and Kagan have "married" sexual deviants while sitting on a court that is going to make a decision on that issue:
"The founder and president of a coalition of black pastors has called upon U.S. Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan to recuse themselves from the same-sex marriage case that is currently before the high court...“A Justice of the Supreme Court is called on to avoid the appearance of bias—especially on a highly controversial and sensitive issue that is currently before the Court,” said Owens. “And yet, both Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kagan have taken a public stance in favor of same-sex marriage, even going so far as to officiate at a same-sex wedding.”
“Not only is this a breach of ethics, but it calls into question the integrity of the Court and the supposed balance that the judicial branch is meant to provide in Constitutional interpretation,” he continued. “It is beyond objectionable that no action has yet been taken to ensure that the case will be adjudicated fairly. And so it falls to us, the people, to take action.”
My question is: Why didn't Chief Justice John Roberts force those morally and ethically bankrupt justices to recuse themselves from the case? It was obvious from their own actions they would not be fair and impartial. That's one of the things I would press if there is a motion for a re-hearing.
While there are many, many excellent articles and columns already written about that decision and because I know time is in short supply, I think this one written by two of the very best legal minds in this country is right to the point:
What can be done to stop this before it goes any further?
First, don't look to Congress because I know sure as the sun shines there are RINOs who will go to the dark side instead of what is constitutionally right and possible: Lawmaker: Congress can halt same-sex 'marriage' in tracks - 'It would make Obergefell a decision that was never enforced at the federal level'
Roe v Wade, another "landmark" decision by unelected judges 42 years and 57 MILLION murdered babies in the womb later is still on the books. HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of dollars have been spent over the past 42 years by the hardest working Americans you'll ever see called the 'pro-life movement'. A ton of that money has gone to reelect "conservatives" to get Roe overturned.
For all the campaign promises from "I'm pro-life!" incumbents in the Outlaw Congress election after election after election, that "law" which was justified by privacy for the female, is still on the books. Republicans had control of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate for eight years under Bush, Jr. Did Roe get abolished? No. All those same incumbents who have received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign donations for their "pro-life" stand have continued to do nothing but con their supporters with no intention of overturning Roe v Wade. Yes, conned them just like any smart street hustler in Vegas.
Don't pro-life Americans get it yet? Instead of the Outlaw Congress impeaching the judges who voted to murder unborn babies, they do nothing but wail out in public. It's no different today and next year those same "conservative" Republicans will run for reelection with being pro-life as part of their campaign promises they have never delivered on because the're gutless cowards.
So what can be done? Not the same old thing that's for sure. Schlafly: Marriage ruling 'not the end, it's the beginning' - Like Roe, Obergefell seen as springboard for movement. With all due respect to Schlafy: Marriage between sexual deviants cannot turn into another cash cow cottage industry. It has to be stopped as quickly as possible. While it took too many years to abolish, prohibition ended because enough Americans said end it.
Prohibition became "law" in January 1920 through a constitutional amendment. No more cocktails or a cold beer on a summer day. As history shows, it was unpopular from day one. Over time and refusal by a lot of Americans to obey such a "law" (speakeasy's, moonshine and a ton of violence), prohibition was overturned in December 1933 by the 21st Amendment.
This is war. As so many religious leaders have strongly voiced over the past few days: Marriage was NOT created by the U.S. Constitution, Congress or any state. Marriage between one man and one woman is dictated by God, not by any government:
Evangelical leader: 'Battlefield shifts to religious freedom' - Supreme Court ruling sets stage for litigious action by LGBT activists. "The Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling only applied to civil marriages, and did not address churches. Yet the gay rights lobby has been aggressively pursuing what they claim are equal rights and equal access, taking their discrimination claims to court with great success."
Leaders of religious denominations across this country sent letters to the "Supreme" Court telling them in no uncertain terms: We will NOT comply. Now every one of them should send a letter on behalf on their congregation to their state governor, state rep and state senator: We will not comply even if it means going to jail. We cannot allow sexual deviant 'marriage' to stand like Roe v Wade has for 42 years.
Southern Baptists: Supreme Court is not final authority on gay marriage. "I declare to everyone today as a minister of the Gospel – I will not officiate over any same-sex unions or same-sex marriage ceremonies,” he said. “I completely refuse.”
So said one pastor and that's what EVERY minister, pastor, deacon and Catholic priest in this country must do now. Self-identified Catholics in this country number 72 million. The BIG question is what is the Catholic Church in this country going to do as a result of that decision? More talk? U.S. Catholic Bishops on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling: ‘Profoundly Immoral and Unjust’. Or, are they willing to get in the trenches with other religious denominations and raise Hell across this country?
There are approximately sixteen MILLION Americans who are part of the Southern Baptist congregations. They must stand with their pastors. Civil disobedience without violence is not a crime, it is a duty to God to stop this toxic cancer called same sex marriage.
Here We Stand: An Evangelical Declaration on Marriage - More than 100 leaders respond to Supreme Court legalizing same-sex marriage.
Civil disobedience means pastors, ministers and priests across this country by the thousands must march for God, judicial tyranny and against filth and sin. Roe v Wade gave doctors permission to murder unborn babies in the womb. But, there is NO law that says any minister, pastor or priest must marry sexual deviants - yet. That's why unlike Roe, pastors, minister and priests are the target and they and the tens of millions in this country who must stand by them have to stand on the front lines and refuse to bow down to a rancid "judicial" decision. What is the federal government going to do? March in with troops and force pastors, ministers and priests to perform "same sex marriage"? Oh, no. First thing is to yank their 501(c)(3) tax exempt status which is the best thing that could happen to churches in this country. Second, the racially corrupt Department of Justice might come after them and oh, won't that be headline news.
Sexual deviants have tried to hijack the civil rights movement who aren't having it - at least those without a political agenda like one of the most prominent race baiting whores in this country next to Jesse Jackson: Statement from Rev. Al Sharpton Regarding President Obama’s Support of Same-Sex Marriage. The criminal impostor in the White House was against sexual deviant marriage in 2008; for it in 2012 for votes. As for Sharpton's blathering it's about social justice and equality, that is nothing but more communist propaganda to destroy the family unit of mother and father. That is the ultimate goal.
Sexual deviants are not born that way like a person's skin color. Elton John was once married to a woman. Dr. Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King cannot change the color of her skin anymore than I can mine. If Elton John was "born that way" and had no choice in the matter and could only be attracted to men, he would never have married a woman.
"Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that gay marriage allows two homosexuals to “find a life they could not find alone.” Then he broke out his acoustic guitar and sang a rousing rendition of “I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing.”
"This is an embarrassment. Our nation's highest court has just upended the institution of marriage, dismantled the rule of law, undermined the will of the people, and canceled out the legislative process entirely, and did so based on the reasoning that gay people want to find a life together. Maybe they do, but what in the hell does that have to do with the Constitution? And how was anyone being denied a “life together” simply because marriage has a definition?...
"Kennedy went further by bemoaning the fact that traditional marriage condemns gay people to “loneliness.” Is this man a Supreme Court justice or Barney the dinosaur? If he's concerned about lonely people, he can, by all means, go and be their friends. But the Constitution was not written to ensure that people aren't lonely. Indeed, the loneliness or unloneliness of an individual is not a legal issue, and it's incredibly nauseating that I even have to explain that."
The Obergefell case should never have been accepted by either appeals courts or the U.S. "Supreme" Court. This column very precisely outlines more damn court battles costing tens of millions of dollars to fight a decision that is nothing more than a "legal" hallucination: Evangelical leader: 'Battlefield shifts to religious freedom'
Most Americans favor 'same sex marriage' is being belched all over the stupid tube and Internet. That's a lie. Thirty states said no when given to the people to decide. In the case of Iowa, those folks acted with determination and got the job done:
DES MOINES — "An unprecedented vote to remove three Iowa Supreme Court justices who were part of the unanimous decision that legalized same-sex marriage in the state was celebrated by conservatives as a popular rebuke of judicial overreach, even as it alarmed proponents of an independent judiciary.
"The outcome of the election was heralded both as a statewide repudiation of same-sex marriage and as a national demonstration that conservatives who have long complained about “legislators in robes” are able to effectively target and remove judges who issue unpopular decisions. Leaders of the recall campaign said the results should be a warning to judges elsewhere. “I think it will send a message across the country that the power resides with the people,” said Bob Vander Plaats, an unsuccessful Republican candidate for governor who led the campaign. “It's we the people, not we the courts.”
"That wasn't the first time. In 1986, three California Supreme Court Justices were ousted in a retention election for opposing the death penalty." Well done. True warriors.
The Big List of marriage-ruling reactions- 'The court can no more redefine marriage than it can redefine gravity'
A few states have already stood fast and are not issuing any marriage licenses. Here in Texas, our Attorney General, Ken Paxton, has taken the right stand: Texas Attorney General orders clerks NOT to issue Gay marriage licenses. However, his directive is being ignored in Midland, Texas, 40 miles west from where I live. The clerks there are issuing marriage licenses to sexual deviants.
Louisiana is not issuing licenses. States of the Union do not have to issue marriage licenses. It is absolutely a Tenth Amendment issue. They can stop issuing marriage licenses statewide in one day. If ministers, pastors and priests across this country refuse to "marry" sexual deviants what's the state going to do? Send in the National Guard and force them? I suppose a Justice of the Peace could do it, but hopefully they will refuse. Only a massive, unrelenting backlash is going to stop this because you can bet the farm next is pedophiles, men marrying their niece, three men marrying two women, man marries dog or as Justice Alito ("Supreme" Court) ask: "Why Not Let 4 Lawyers Marry"? There will be no end to the perversions if this isn't stopped.
Oklahoma Bill Would Give Clergy Power Over Marriage Licenses. The bill in that article can be introduced and passed quickly in states like Texas that have a Republican majority in the House, the Senate and the Governor who is also a Republican. While Texas' legislature is now out of session until January 2017, Gov. Abbott can call a special session and get it done in one day. However, that will not happen unless enough Texans and clergy of all denominations burn his phone at the capitol (or faxes).
While I hate to do it because it does hurt workers who are opposed to the sexual deviant agenda, we must in mass boycott companies that promote the spread of HIV/AIDS and the dozens of lavender diseases that plague homosexuals. By condoning and promoting sexual deviants that's exactly what they're doing right along with the U.S. government. I will not shop at Home Depot and Target to name a few. I won't patronize Starbucks or any other company no matter how much I want something.
God's law and my soul are more important. I've been doing it since NAFTA was passed in 1994 over "free" trade. Nothing new for me. You either stand by your convictions or you have none. I know it's difficult because the list below are some of the biggest corporations in the world. However, all they care about is the bottom line and that's where you can use your consumer dollars to bring change.
Is America too busy to defend God's laws? Will ministers, pastors, Catholic priests and bishops stand up to judicial tyranny and refuse to back down no matter threats from the federal government? Will states (forget California, NY and others drowning in filth and sin) immediately act to stop issuing marriage licenses? Pray they do.
Businesses can refuse to make 'gay' shirts
The photo will make you puke:
2 - Obama: I'll Commemorate Sunday as ‘International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia’
3 - National Organization for Marriage: Can't Support Rubio, Jeb After Same-Sex Marriage Cave
4 - Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments, Employers, Schools
5 - Gay rights supporters push beyond marriage to broader legal protections
[Just a short note about 9/11. The cost of America's undeclared "war" (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or give a copy as a present. I've purchased half a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It's very powerful simply because it's one 'ordinary' man's story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in this film that many have never heard about but everyone should. Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend.]
© 2015 - NewsWithViews.com and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.
Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.
E-mail is: email@example.com