NewsWithViews on Pinterest NewsWithViews on Google+

Additional Titles







Vote Fraud: What They Aren't Telling You

Forced Mental Health Screening for Your Children












By: Devvy
December 22, 2013

Chapter 10 of James Murphy's translation of Mein Kampf:

"All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true within itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."

While America has been focused on Christmas shopping, parties and the Duck Dynasty controversy, a new revelation about 9/11 slipped quietly past the notice of not only the American people, but every major "news" outlet from the "Big 3" to all the cable networks (FOX, CNN & MSNBC) who to this day are enablers of the U.S. government's blatant lies about 9/11. After all, we have to remember this:

"Ryan Mauro: You have devoted a lot of your time towards covering Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal. Can you tell us about him and why he warrants this attention?

"Diana West: Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is usually described as a billionaire Saudi businessman, but he is also a senior member of the Saudi monarchy. He is the nephew of the Saudi dictator, King Abdullah, and the first cousin of the Saudi interior minister, Prince Mohammed bin Nayef. He is also the largest stakeholder in Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. outside the Murdoch family."

FOX "news" and their gab fests anchored by O'Reilly, Hannity, Megyn Kelly and Greta Van Susteren are guilty of the same SOP as all the others: they decide what you need to know and who to burn in the dirty world of politics.

This latest exposure should have rippled across this country like a bombshell; at least one "mainstream" media publication actually covered it:

Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup

"After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors. But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals. It was kept secret and remains so today.

"President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn't just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

"A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks. "Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can't reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So they've proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”

Text of the “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001" 838 page whitewash is here. You will see a large number of redactions, but no gap of 28 pages, so one has to wonder exactly where and under what heading were the 28 pages pulled? Page 675 covers Joint Hearings and individuals. Too many are closed. On page 9 is a letter signed by two dishonorable individuals, former Rep. Bob Graham and Sen. Richard Shelby. It states unclassified portions of the report were being delivered to the late, dishonorable Sen. Robert Byrd. Then the cover up: "The remainder of the report contains highly classified and sensitive information and must be retained in the secure facilities of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, in accordance with past practicies regarding their retention by the committee of classified annexes."

They know what's in those 28 pages and decided to keep the truth from we the people for political expediency. The collective swine who serve on those committees and put out that report start out on page 23 with a big, fat lie: the exact date wasn't known. Anyone who has spent huge amounts of time reading and researching 9/11 knows this to be false. Many were given a warning, i.e., former SF mayor, Willie Brown, was told a full eight hours before the attacks not to fly that day. And, how about the smarmy, slimy former Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush?

Brother Jeb's Timely Executive Order

"On September 7, 2001, only four days before the "event," Florida Governor Jeb Bush issued an executive order. This was only one business day from 9/11. His brother, President Bush, is due in his state on September 11th. What is the significance of this rather timely EO? "Among the reasons cited in the document for the action was prophetically "potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism" (Executive Order #01-261, Section 3)....However, what is most startling about EO #01-261 is its predecessor. Executive Order #01-261 concludes by revoking Executive Order #01-17 which is nearly identical to EO #01-261 except for the language addressing "potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism." Issued on January 19, 2001, EO #01-17 wasn't to expire until June 30, 2003. This raises the question as to what events occurred on or prior to September 7, 2001, that compelled the president's brother to replace an existing executive order with another executive order which effectively inserted a reference to "acts of terrorism."

"Some will say it was just a coincidence, just like the biggest voting mess in a presidential election ever witnessed in this country just also happened to take place in the candidate's brother's state (brother Jeb, Florida) who also serves as governor. And, the candidate, George Bush, is also the governor of one of the biggest states of the Union! Gee, what a coincidence. Does brother Jeb's new EO, only four days before 9/11, indicate prior knowledge of something? That new EO gives Jeb the authority to call up the National Guard for "an act of terrorism" and declare martial law. Could the timing be anymore suspect? Why did Jeb issue this new EO four days before 9/11 when the existing EO, which didn't include terrorism, wasn't due to expire for two plus years? Jeb Bush needs to be put under oath and all the paper trail connected to this new EO (if it hasn't been shredded) be made available to we the people."

Within hours of 9/11, Osama bin Laden was fingered as the mastermind, yet Condaleeza Rice, Bush, Jr.'s National Security Adviser at the time and member of the treasonous Council on Foreign Relations, said this only seven days before the attacks:

"We also moved to develop a new and comprehensive strategy to eliminate the al Qaeda terrorist network. President Bush understood the threat, and he understood its importance. He made clear to us that he did not want to respond to al Qaeda one attack at a time. He told me he was "tired of swatting flies. "This new strategy was developed over the Spring and Summer of 2001, and was approved by the president's senior national security officials on September 4. It was the very first major national security policy directive of the Bush administration -- not Russia, not missile defense, not Iraq, but the elimination of al Qaeda."

What better way than a coordinated attack on America killing 3,000 human beings and act surprised - who was behind it? Why al Qaeda, of course! She also vomited another lie in that interview: "The U.S. government did not act against the growing threat from Imperial Japan until the threat became all too evident at Pearl Harbor."

Roosevelt knew the Japanese were going to attack. He WANTED them to make the first move - My column:

FDR and The Pearl Harbor Attack "The United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act." Pearl Harbor was no surprise. “Day of infamy,” indeed."

As many researchers have brought forth:

CIA created al-Qaeda and gave $3 BILLION to Osama bin Laden

"The US government trained, armed, funded and supported Osama bin Laden and his followers in Afghanistan during the cold war. With a huge investment of $3,000,000,000 (three billion US dollars), the CIA effectively created and nurtured bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist network using American tax-payers money. Afghanistan is one of the world's poorest countries, where such an enormous sum sum of money would have had extraordinary value."

$3 BILLION dollars stolen from you, me, our children and grand children for geopolitical games. And, since the people's purse was overdrawn at the time, it was borrowed; more debt slapped on our backs.

"Our" CIA wouldn't do such a thing, would they? I again highly recommend reading The Praetorian Guard: The U.S. Role in the New World Order by John Stockwell published in 1999. It was one of the books I read early on in my journey which sickened me. Stockwell is the highest member of the CIA to ever go public with the truth: "John Stockwell, former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, working for then Director of the CIA, George Bush. He spent 13 years in the agency. He gives a short history of CIA covert operations. He is a very compelling speaker and the highest level CIA officer to testify to the Congress about his actions. He estimates that over 6 million people have died in CIA covert actions, and this was in the late 1980's. THE SECRET WARS OF THE CIA: by John Stockwell - A lecture given in October, 1987."

All done in our name. As I have written before: Muslims don't hate us for our freedom, they hate us for killing innocent men, women and children in countless countries chasing an ideology, not an army or foreign military force.

Why wasn't bin Laden wanted by the FBI for 9/11 since he was supposedly the mastermind behind al-Qaeda and the attacks that day?

FBI says, it has “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

"The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.”

"On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

What? The media in all forms for years saturated this country from day one that Osama Bin Laden orchestrated 9/11 from some cave in Afghanistan. Let's not forget our other "ally", Pakistan:

Mysterious September 11 Breakfast Meeting on Capitol Hill

"The chairmen of the Joint Inquiry have dubious links to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) which is known to have actively supported Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Moreover, according to intelligence sources, including the FBI, Pakistan's ISI played a role in financing the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The two Joint Inquiry chairmen Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter Goss were fully cognizant of the "Pakistani ISI connection" and the role played by its former head, General Mahmoud Ahmad.

"Why then did they choose to exclude an examination of the role of the ISI from the Joint Inquiry's 858 page Report?...

"On the morning of September 11, the three lawmakers Bob Graham, Porter Goss and Jon Kyl (who were part of the Congressional delegation to Pakistan) were having breakfast on Capitol Hill with General Ahmad, the alleged "money-man" (to use the FBI expression) behind the 9/11 hijackers. Also present at this meeting were Pakistan's ambassador to the U.S. Maleeha Lodhi and several members of the Senate and House Intelligence committees. This meeting was described by one press report as a "follow-up meeting" to that held in Pakistan in late August."

The thieves in the Outlaw Congress - your congress critter and senator and mine raped us in violation of the U.S. Congress from 9/11 until last year to the tune of $18 BILLION borrowed dollars for unconstitutional "foreign aid" to Pakistan.

Before I get too far off point as I attempt to keep my blood from boiling, we now have two current members of the Outlaw Congress, a Republican and Democrat attempting to expose more truth about 9/11 - other coverage:

Congressman Lynch introduces bipartisan House Resolution seeking declassification of 9-11 documents - Dec 3, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC—"Last night, Congressman Stephen F. Lynch and Republican Congressman Walter B. Jones of North Carolina jointly introduced a bipartisan House Resolution, H. Res. 428, designed to shed additional light on continuing questions about the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

"This House Resolution urges the President to declassify 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001. This portion has remained classified since the Inquiry's findings were first released in December 2002. Congressman Lynch recently had the opportunity to review the 28 pages and believes they should be made public.

“Twelve years after the horrific September 11 attacks, unanswered questions still remain. These pages contain information that is vital to a full understanding of the events and circumstances surrounding this tragedy. The families of the victims and the American people deserve better; they deserve answers, they deserve a full accounting, and that has not happened yet. I am very pleased to be working with my friend and colleague Congressman Jones to ensure these pages see the light of day. I strongly encourage my colleagues to review this classified section of the Inquiry, and to work with me and Congressman Jones to get it declassified.”

H.Res.428 - Urging the president to release information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States was introduced December 2, 2013, and referred to the oxymoron known as House Committee on Intelligence; to date it has 1 cosponsor. Remember what Lynch and Shelby said: they were "absolutely shocked" by the content. The families of the 9/11 attacks and we the people have the absolute right to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth, not more sanitized, government approved versions of their story. My question is: Why did they wait so long to introduce a resolution? That report was released in December 2002. Lynch has only been in the Outlaw Congress since January 2013, but Jones has been warming his seat since 1995. Why now? Someone whispered in their ear.

Let's also not forget this: Confirmed: Saudis flown Out of US 9/13/01 Under FBI Supervision - No one else received such preferrential treatment. Why Saudi's when 15 of the hijackers were Saudi Arabian - or so it is alleged?

In a pig's ear the impostor squatting in OUR house will declassify those 28 blank pages. There can be no doubt the truth about 9/11 is a massive lie. A reprehensible cover up.

F.A.A. Official Scrapped Tape of 9/11 Controllers' Statements - May 6, 2004

"At least six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, made a tape recording that same day describing the events, but the tape was destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it, the Transportation Department said in a report today.

"The taping began before noon on Sept. 11 at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center, in Ronkonkoma, on Long Island, where about 16 people met in a basement conference room known as "the Bat Cave" and passed around a microphone, each recalling his or her version of the events a few hours earlier.

"But officials at the center never told higher-ups of the tape's existence, and it was later destroyed by an F.A.A. official described in the report as a quality-assurance manager there. That manager crushed the cassette in his hand, shredded the tape and dropped the pieces into different trash cans around the building, according to a report made public today by the inspector general of the Transportation Department.

"The tape had been made under an agreement with the union that it would be destroyed after it was superseded by written statements from the controllers, according to the inspector general's report. But the quality-assurance manager asserted that making the tape had itself been a violation of accident procedures at the Federal Aviation Administration, the report said."

The quality assurance manager said he would destroy the tape again. Nothing was ever done to that individual who felt the tape so unimportant he not only shredded it, he felt the need to drop the pieces into different trash cans around the building! We have to remember what they were doing that day: "On the tape, the controllers, some of whom had spoken by radio to people on the planes and some who had tracked the aircraft on radar, gave statements of 5 to 10 minutes each, according to the report." There has been great speculation about Flight 77 and the Pentagon. It' my personal opinion that plane flew over the Pentagon and out into the Atlantic Ocean. It is the only logical conclusion since those of us not in denial know it was not a commercial air liner that crashed into that fortress.

9/11 is one of the most written about, speculated about and researched as any event in the history of the world. What is it going to take for the American people by the tens of millions demanding the truth about that day? This is the 12th Christmas the families of 9/11 will spend without their loved ones. So many have died from cancer (first responders) while the guilty parties are still free. Unacceptable in my book and I hope yours.

Since 9/11, the U.S. Congress has passed unconstitutional bills stripping us of our rights and freedoms, i.e., the insidious Patriot Act and the grand daddy of them all, the NDAA allowing for any American to be picked up off the street or dragged out of your home and held indefinitely without the ability to contact a lawyer or family. ANY current member of the Outlaw Congress who voted for either one of those freedom crushing bills should be defeated in the upcoming primaries. Stalin, Lenin, Mao and Hitler would rejoice if alive today.

A dear friend of mine has written the most comprehensive work on the secret societies who run the world; see Features at link, parts 2-13. The elites who crack the whip keeping the poltroons in the U.S. Congress in line. In part 13 of Robert Motch's series, he puts forth a proposal: Build a model to scale to recreate what really happened to World Trade Center Tower Two. Building Seven is too obvious a planned, controlled demolition. As pointed out in the link: "The BBC and CNN also both reported the collapse of Building 7 more than twenty minutes before it actually fell." CNN's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

As a matter of fact, let's cover Tony Ferrell here. Many of us watched coverage of the BBC reporting Building 7 had collapsed while right behind the anchor woman, you can see the building still standing. Ferrell decided to take on the liars:

Historical Case Against BBC Cover Up 9/11 Evidence

"This court case is based around Tony making a stand and refusing to pay his TV licence fee under Section 15 of The Terrorism Act 2000 Article 3 which states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism. The BBC has withheld scientific evidence which clearly demonstrates that the official version of events of 9/11 is not possible and could not have been carried out in entirety by those who have been accused by our officials. In addition, the BBC has actively blocked and smeared those attempting to bring this evidence to the public. By doing this the BBC are supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and are therefore supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have not yet been identified and held to account. A new and independent investigation is required to determine what really did occur on 9/11, and by whom, otherwise these unidentified terrorist elements will remain free to potentially commit further terrorist activities.

"Tony has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV licence fee, however, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate's court where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge....

"Tony Farrell is a former Intelligence Analyst for South Yorkshire Police Department. In 2010 he was fired because he felt compelled by his conscience to tell the truth in his official report and state that due to his extensive analysis of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings, the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment. He is now dedicating his life to helping to expose the truth and he is challenging his dismissal through international court. Tony Rooke has recently produced an excellent documentary called ‘Offensive – the story of Tony Farrell’ based around the story of Tony Farrell. Here is the link to that documentary."

UK Man Wins Court Victory Over BBC for 9/11 Coverup Broadcast - April 2013. Farrell won and paid no fine. THAT should have been huge news in this country.

Going back to Robert Motch's proposal. Build a model to scale and recreate the exact conditions of a plane hitting the building. A rather large undertaking, but it could be done. Purchase a commercial air plane at auction or one heading to the scrap heap. It can be remotely flown we know that (and no, that's not what happened to any of the planes on 9/11). Show the world the government's fairy tale is just that. Robert goes into detail in Part 13 of his House That Evil Built series here. If you're pressed for time, use a word search: Dartmouth and it will take you right to the section on building the model and who should do it.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

I know Robert would like to involve Architects and Engineers 9/11 For the Truth. I would also recommend the great individuals at Pilots for 9/11 Truth for obvious reasons. This can be done; I'll be following it closely. As I said, all of the draconian bills passed in the past 12 years are because of 9/11. We are no safer today than that day because of our open borders. I don't know about you, but I am sick of all the lies and deception about that day.

You can take money to the bank even if the resolution passes in the U.S. House, Barry Soetoro aka Obama, will never agree to releasing those 28 pages and betray his Muslim buddies. Seeing is believing and that's what Robert Motch is trying to make happen.


Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Several members of the 9-11 Commission are CFR members
One doesn't have to buy his take on 'peak oil', Michael Ruppert covers
in his book, Crossing the Rubicon, but it is one of the best accounts
of what happened that day known at the time he wrote the book.
Also highly recommend - meticulous research:

1- The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11
2- The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions
3- Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory
4- The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé
5- 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press
6- The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False
7- Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

Click here to visit home page.

© 2013 - and Devvy - All Rights Reserved

Share This Article

Click Here For Mass E-mailing

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.

Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: You can also sign up for her free email alerts.

E-mail is:








While America has been focused on Christmas shopping, parties and the Duck Dynasty controversy, a new revelation about 9/11 slipped quietly past the notice of not only the American people, but every major "news" outlet from the "Big 3" to all the cable networks (FOX, CNN & MSNBC) who to this day are enablers of the U.S. government's blatant lies about 9/11. After all, we have to remember this...