Other Devvy Articles:
PROPER ROLE OF AMERICA'S MILITARY
July 27, 2004
On the morning of April 20, 1986, Americans woke up to the news that Air Force F-111's and other support aircraft had carried out a full scale raid on Moamaar Khadafy in Libya. Why did Ronald Reagan order this precision bombing of Tripoli? A series of telex messages had been intercepted from Libya's East Berlin embassy right before and after a disco was bombed in West Berlin on April 5, 1986. Based on hard intelligence, Reagan cited "irrefutable" evidence that Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy was the brains behind the bombing and the decision was made to strike back.
This act of cowardice by terrorists killed two people, including an American GI; hundreds were wounded, including 50 to 60 Americans. Once Reagan was absolutely certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that Libya was responsible for this unprovoked act which led to the murder and injury of Americans, he acted without hesitation, saying, "I warned that there should be no place on earth where terrorists can rest and train and practice their deadly skills. I meant it. I said that we would act with others, if possible, and alone if necessary to ensure that terrorists have no sanctuary anywhere. Tonight, we have." We did act alone; France wouldn't even allow our aircraft to fly over their air space.
The guidelines for this mission were crystal clear: There should be minimal risk to pilots to reduce any chance of our own becoming POWs. The targets would be military, civilians would be spared as much as possible, but there was no mistake: Go for the kill and send a very clear and unequivocal message to anyone who dare harm our own. There was no warning to we the people or Khadafy and that's the way it should be. If the proof is there, our military go, get the job done and come home. War is ugly, but we have an indisputable right to strike quickly and decisively against anyone who hurts US.
We did not invade that country and begin the process of destroying the culture of the indigenous population by forcing "democracy" on them. Following our right to retaliate against any nation that kills or harms our own, Reagan did not engage in an endless and deceitful mission to "rebuild" Libya. Americans were not fleeced to the tune of tens and tens of billions of dollars to provide "humanitarian aid," build new schools or become friends with an enemy nation - a certain recipe for failure. It is not our responsibility or duty to "win the hearts and minds" of any foreign country or their people to fight some endless "war on terrorism."
Within 48 hours after the attack on America, September 11, 2001, with absolutely no proof whatsoever, Bush, Jr. and his supporters declared a murderous band of thugs calling themselves Al-Qaida were without question or doubt, responsible for the carnage on U.S. soil. Bush's response was to go bomb Afghanistan and create the current disaster that exists there today (search). If Bush, Jr. felt he had proof positive that Afghanistan was behind 9-11, he should have done the same thing as Reagan.
Next on the list of pre-planned invasions was Iraq, which has cost the lives of over 1,000 of our precious freedom fighters to date. Bush apologists continue to justify the lack of evidence of WMDs by chanting "Hussein is a monster and isn't the world better off without him?" Most certainly the world is, but it was not our job to invade a foreign country, which just happens to be rich in oil, to oust any head of state. We don't have the right to invade other countries and set up shop in furtherance of a new world order.
There are still too many questions about 9-11 and even the families of the victims no longer believe the inconsistencies put out by this administration and these so-called commissions comprised of old friends of the old guard. The lawsuits currently wending their way through the courts over 9-11, God willing through the discovery process, will finally produce some actual truth about what really happened that day.
On the threshold of the new world order: The Wilsonian vision and American foreign policy in the 1990s and beyond
This "war" in Iraq isn't about some vague "war on terror," it's about nation building for a new world order.
"Although President Bush (Sr) called the New World Order a "big idea" one may surmise that the President did not follow through with the concept of a New World Order because he had not thought it through (in Iraq, 1991)...Instead, I shall urge that we revive the concept of a New World Order, rescue the phrase from cynicism and invest in it a vision that should become the organizing principle of American foreign policy in the 1990s and into the next century." Senator Joseph Biden (Democrat), speech addressing the U.S. Senate, June 29, 1992: On the Threshold of a New World Order, An American Agenda for the New World Order, Fulfilling the Wilsonian Vision. This 52-page document is nothing short of sedition, make no mistake about it: This is the agenda of the White House and Congress regardless of which "party" holds the majority.
George Bush, Sr. used the phrase, "new world order," 162 times during his presidency, always promoting a one world government headed up by the communist controlled UN as the official agenda of this government. Bush, Sr. boldly stated many times that the purpose of the Gulf War was to "empower the UN and create a new world order." In his National Security Strategy of the United States (1991), Bush Sr. declared, "I hope history will record that the Gulf crisis was the crucible of the new world order." The U.S. Congress funded (and each sitting President has approved those budgets) the arming of Hussein and dozens of other "enemies" of the United States. Our citizens and our freedom fighters have paid the tab with their lives for this insane foreign policy.
For those who knee-jerk that Bush, Jr., isn't pursuing the same agenda as his father, you are willfully turning a blind eye to the truth. To these Americans who can't bring themselves to believe they have been betrayed by their party, whether it be the Democrats or the Republicans, you will have to live with the destruction heaped upon this country by your refusal to believe the documented facts. If this offends anyone, I respectfully submit that you need to turn off Hannity & Colmes and do the hard homework.
Allow me to quote from an upcoming work to be released later this year by one of the most dedicated researchers I have ever had the honor of knowing:
"In Stalin's Russia, notes Mikahil Heller, enemies were blamed for everything; they were used to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968) and the invasion of Afghanistan in 1980. The Soviet Communists were thus able to manipulate Soviet citizens into supporting government hunts for "terrorists," "traitors," and spies, for "liberation wars" for humanity. Using Marxist-Leninist strategies, the Russian, Chinese and U.S. ruling elites have sought to frighten Americans and other populaces with the specter of ruthless mass terror. They have created enemies and blamed them for everything including terrorist acts. They have used them to justify the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries and to manipulate Americans into supporting government hunts in the exact same manner as the Communist Russians. Their aim is to manipulate whole populations into supporting "wars of national liberation" and achieving not only the sovietization of "liberated" undeveloped countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, but also the full altruization and sovietization of the United States and other Western nations.
"On September 20, 2001, President Bush said, "Americans are asking: Who attacked our country? The evidence we have gathers all points to ...al Qaeda...This group and its leader - a person named Osama bin Laden - are linked to many other organization in different countries...There are thousands of these terrorists in more than 60 countries. They are recruited from their own nations...and brought to camps in places like Afghanistan, where they are trained in the tactics of terrors. They are sent...to hide in countries around the world to plot evil and destruction."
"The Russian and Communist Chinese have been arming and inciting "wars of national liberation" for years. On September 14, 2002, Bush, Jr., said, "...Saddam Hussein's regime has proven itself a grave and gathering danger...We must stand up for our security...The world community must do so, as well." Globlalist communitarians including America's leaders deliberately built up Saddam Hussein's regime, then sought to "liberate" Iraq.
"By waging the "battle of Iraq" and by preparing our future battles in the ongoing "war against terrorism," the globalist elites have been able to carry forward their chief goals. First, in Iraq, Americans once again were manipulated into fighting a "war of national liberation" and helping an "oppressed people." On April 5, 2003, Bush, Jr., said, "...liberation is coming. The people of Iraq have my pledge: Out fighting forces will press on until their oppressors are gone." Second, globalists have been able to implement their plans for the sovietization of the Iraqi society. On May 1, 2003, Bush, Jr., declared, "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended...And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country." On May 3, 2003, Bush, Jr., said, "Our coalition has much work to do in Iraq...We are helping to rebuild Iraq..." The Socialist/Communist coalition has justified its programs and policies on ideological grounds, holding that its aims are to liberate and improve man and society. Then it proceeds to instill Soviet communitarian ideology and community values into the masses."
The same agenda will be carried on by Marxist John Kerry should the shadow government decide to remove Bush, Jr., from the White House. Kerry's political and social agenda is based on communism using "community values," promising "free medical health care" and a whole laundry list of other addictive "entitlements." There is a choice if Americans can find the courage to reject what's just over the horizon.
How we shame our Founding Fathers and thousands of Colonials who gave up their tomorrows just to see a lazy, self-indulgent people toss away the precious freedoms we were given by the spilling of their blood because of blind loyalty to a political party. There is absolutely no constitutional authority for robbing you, me, our children and grand children to invade foreign countries and then spend tens and tens of billions of dollars using our military to foster communism in foreign countries. It's not our job to go hunt terrorists around the world. Do I want to see this scum perpetrate any further acts of terrorism on U.S. soil? Such an insulting question doesn't even dignify an answer. Seal up our borders, round up all illegals -terrorists among them pre-positioning themselves on our soil - and ship them out. We are 200 million guns strong and we're not afraid to fight an enemy on our soil if it comes to that.
Certainly caring Americans feel compassion for people living under despotic regimes, but it's not up to our military to die in endless wars for the international banking cartel and their quest for a one world totalitarian government. Our military is for our security right here on U.S. soil. If a foreign country kills or hurts our people abroad, then we have the right to jam bombs and missiles right down the throat of that government. Our peace and security is maintained through superior fire power and the will to use it, but only as a last resort.
Last week Bush announced he wants another $100 hundred billion dollars to "rebuild" Iraq; this includes providing free medical care and a thousand other perks to the people of that country. There is no money in the U. S. Treasury. America isn't a prosperous country. Our economy is based on debt. Debt is not prosperity. Every penny being stolen from we the people has to be borrowed from the central bank. Everyone who supports this phony "war on terrorism" in Iraq is further indenturing my daughter, my parents, my nieces and nephews and yours into financial bondage for which we can never financially recover. Most likely, Americans will ignore the facts in this article....until the draft is reinstated (which those in the know predict will be in the near future). Perhaps then, when your sons, daughters and grand children between the ages of 18-26 are sent to fight yet another "war on terrorism" in some foreign country, Americans will "get it."
There is no question that terrorism is a very serious a threat to our Republic. That's why our military must be brought home from baby-sitting duty in 120 countries on this globe where we have no business. We need our military here on U.S. soil and if there are any more acts of terrorism, we will be able to protect ourselves and our borders. Right now our military are giving free medical and dental care to villages in countries like Haiti with you footing the bill. My husband spent 27 years in the Army, retired as a full Colonel and we don't get free medical or dental care. But, I have to pay for some villager in New Guinea to receive free medical and dental care using borrowed money, administered by our active duty soldiers? Private charity organizations are the ones to provide humanitarian services, not our military and not the U.S. Treasury.
In order to further attract more cannon fodder to send to fight this endless "war on terror," the U.S. Army offers free breast implant jobs. Females in the Army can get a couple sacs of gooey stuff sewn into their chests so they can "Be all you can be." It is reported that between 2000 and 2003, military doctors performed 496 breast enlargements and 1,361 liposuction surgeries on "soldiers" and their dependents - all paid for with borrowed money. That debt is heaped on your children's back. This is what the Bush Administration and Congress continue to steal the sweat off your back for in more and more military funding? Female "soldiers" getting bags sewn into their chest - this is needed to fight the "war on terrorism" in Iraq or teach kids how to use computers in Kosovo?
How much more are you going to take, America...or should we start practicing now and start calling each other Comrade?
© 2004 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Has been a guest more than 1600 times on radio shows, ran for Congress twice and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com Devvy's web site is: www.devvy.com; is sponsored by El Dorado Gold; e-mail is: firstname.lastname@example.org
George Bush, Sr. used the phrase, "new world order," 162 times during his presidency, always promoting a one world government headed up by the communist controlled UN as the official agenda of this government.