Additional Titles

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other
Devvy
Articles:

Vote Fraud: What They Aren't Telling You

Forced Mental Health Screening for Your Children


More
Devvy
Articles:

 

 

 

 

 

PROTECTING WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS

 

 

By: Devvy

October 3, 2005

NewsWithViews.com

As predicted, John Roberts was confirmed by the counterfeit senate as the 17th Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. I opposed him because of his pro bono work on the landmark Romer v. Evans ruling which demonstrates he has bought into the propaganda that sodomites are "born that way" and somehow entitled to special rights. Catholic in name only, Chief Justice John Roberts' work on the Romer v Evans ruling is what gives legitimacy to the perversions practiced by sodomites and lesbians. Roberts' is part and parcel of what led to one of the most destructive cases in the history of this republic, Lawrence v Texas, a case covered thoroughly in Dr. Edwin Vieira's powerful book, How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary.

Last month, the ultimate in deviant behavior and perversions was paraded in broad day light at the Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco, California. The fact that 400,000 people - who brought minor children to watch such filth in public - demonstrates exactly how far into the sewer Americans now wallow. Sodomites, lesbians and "transgender" perverts do not reproduce. Because these sexual deviants do not reproduce, they must have been delighted to see all those children being indoctrinated into accepting their toxic lifestyles and how everyone should be "tolerant." I call them future recruits.

You can view photos of this "parade," but I warn you very strongly, these photographs are extremely graphic with a link to the boys and girls pages. There were no arrests during this public exhibition of naked men urinating, naked men cavorting with each other, naked women (multiples) simulating sex - all in broad day light on a major street in SF. It is obvious that the city fathers of SF approve of such rancid behavior and I encourage everyone to boycott the City of San Francisco. Do not book your convention there, vacation or travel to the city for dinner or shopping. If you think this won't come to your city or town, think again. This cancer is spreading.

The real questions that should have been asked of Roberts were not. Bush and his "conservative" friends in Congress went all out to garner the support of pro-life Americans while the "left" concentrated on "rights" for sodomites, lesbians and a woman's "right" to abort her unborn child. I can still remember watching the last Democratic National Convention on the tube. Each time one of the party favorites up on the stage promised to protect a woman's "right to choose," I watched five thousand thundering, screaming, jumping up and down delegates going wild, cheering on a politician who promises them the "right" murder a baby in the womb.

The evil doers are very clever in how the dress up perversion and murder with very carefully crafted words and phrases, i.e. "gay." I want to tell you how the Democrats tried to skewer me when I ran for Congress on the issue of abortion. The debates and speeches I made were public events and all were welcome to hear the candidates. It became very apparent to me from the git-go that the Democrats were "salting" the audience with pro-abortion men and women to go after Devvy. It didn't work. This was a typical exchange during the question and answer time:

"Woman: You want to take away a woman's right to choose. I won't vote for someone who won't protect women's reproductive rights."

My response: "Well, now, let's examine your statement, shall we? Reproductive rights means a woman deciding whether or not to conceive a child. Can you show me one law in any of the 50 states of the Union that prohibits a woman's right to reproduce? Not a court order for junkies having babies while on crack, but any law that denies a woman her right to reproduce? Of course you can't, because there are no such laws. Abortion actually interferes with your reproductive rights. Reproduction means having a child. Abortion interferes with that process."

Silence or sputtering by the audience plant.

Male voter: "I support a woman's right to choose because it's her body."

My response: "How very sensitive and politically correct of you, sir, and how very selfish. Abortion hasn't just become a way for women to dispose of an inconvenient baby. Oh, no fellas. Men who allow a woman to kill their unborn son or daughter are off the hook for child support. You see, sir, an unplanned pregnancy isn't just about the woman's life changing, it's also about how a little baby - especially one that is conceived through casual sex - crimps a guy's life style. What man in his right mind would want a child of his loins murdered? Sensitive and politically correct? I don't think so. No baby, child support, no crimp in lifestyle. How shameful."

Woman: "The constitution says I have the right to choose abortion."

My response: "No, it doesn't. However, for the sake of argument (and I whip out my pocket constitution), please show me where in the Constitution it supports your argument?" Of course, this shuts up these plants pretty quickly because their ignorance is on display for all to see.

Woman: "The right to choose isn't about killing a baby because it's not a baby until after its born. It's just a fetus."

This one is the favorite of "pro choice" advocates. I always knew it was coming during a Q & A and my response to such warped thinking was this:

"So, a fetus is not a baby? Fine, then just leave this fetus where it is! Why bother to go through a medical procedure if it's not really human life in the beginning stages of growth and maturity? If it's not human life that grows within your belly, just leave it there, you know like a harmless cyst or something?"

Dead silence. You could literally see the look of shock on the faces of the audience. You could see the wheels spinning with the one and only conclusion they could come to, but I didn't let them off the hook: "You know the honest answer to my question, don't you? Because that fetus the feminists have convinced you is not a baby - just some harmless fetal matter - if you leave this fetus where it is for nine months, you will give birth to a baby. Leave that fetus alone in a woman's womb and the miracle of conception that took place when the egg was fertilized, continues to grow until the baby is ready to leave the safety of mother's womb the way nature intended and enter the world."

After I made my comments from the speaker's table at the first debate, I saw several women softly crying. I know why. They were crying because they value the sanctity of life above all and watching these men and women try to back me into a corner to take away votes by promoting the murder of a helpless baby is enough to break anyone's heart. It soon became apparent that I wasn't going to let these plants in the audiences at speeches or debates off the hook, so that type of pathetic salting of the audiences stopped altogether.

The reason the pro-abortion crowd like Hillary Clinton, Diane Feinstein, Rosie O'Donnell, the mouthpieces for NOW (National Organization of Witches) and other "right to choose" operations use clever phrases such as "protecting a woman's reproductive rights," is to keep a teenager or adult age woman from thinking about conception as it really happens. They don't want women to seriously think about what a "fetus" really is. They continue to chant the mantra that a fetus is really just some vaguely named tissue that needs to be removed by some non-personal surgical procedure. These pro-death promoters don't want women to come to the realization that by having an abortion they really are murdering a helpless baby that is growing to full term. Abortion stops that tiny, beating heart.

Unfortunately, so many teenagers and women who have aborted their unborn child realized the truth too late and have suffered long term depression and other emotional problems. They finally realized what they did and they can barely live with themselves after the fact. Of course, Hillary or Rosie aren't there to hold the hands of these deeply troubled women. They're busy flirting around in their limousines giving speeches about "a woman's right to choose." These pro-death promoters also don't want women to ask questions about long term health risks such as the link to breast cancer and abortion. These pro-death peddlers scream like banshees to keep photos of a baby being aborted because they don't want women to see the horrible, raw truth of a murder with their consent.

The U.S. Supreme Court isn't going to over turn Roe v. Wade. Even Laura Bush, nick named the "Stepford Wife of Pennsylvania Avenue," doesn't want Roe v Wade overturned. In an interview with Katy Couric on the TODAY show just two days before her husband was sworn in as president, Mrs. Bush responded to the specific question: Should the 1973 Supreme Court decision on abortion be overturned, she said, "No, I don't think that it should be overturned." Her position shouldn't surprise anyone considering Bush's betrayal on funding for organizations that promote abortion.

The right to life is one of the most precious tenets of the values upon which America was founded. It became very cheap after the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s when having sex with anyone and everyone was considered "free love" and the thing to do. Along with such irresponsible behavior came the real push to legalize abortion as a counter to all that free, unrestricted sex and letting everyone off the hook. My mom birthed five children, three girls and two boys. It was very difficult financially; we were dirt poor. But, in our big, crazy family of Catholic-Italians, my mother would no more have thought about killing the precious life growing in her belly than she would chopping off her own arm. There was always enough food, even though it was generally some form of pasta for two meals a day. Us girls wore hand me downs and so did my two brothers. Life wasn't easy, but we all made it just fine. I love my siblings and all of our lives are richer because my mom valued the life of her unborn.

The best we can do and have been doing over the past three plus decades is to continue instilling the value of life in our children and that killing a fetus IS murder of a tiny little baby in the most heinous and painful procedure that the majority of Americans haven't seen because they don't want to see. Women have known about birth control for thousands of years. So have men. How about taking personal responsibility for your own actions instead of murdering the innocent result of carelessness and/or casual sex? If getting pregnant is absolutely out of the question for you, then take the issue seriously and stop using abortion as birth control.

2005 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale


Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Get a free copy of Why A Bankrupt America from El Dorado Gold. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com.

Devvy's website: www.devvy.com

E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net


 

Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

The right to life is one of the most precious tenets of the values upon which America was founded. It became very cheap after the "sexual revolution" of the 1960s when having sex with anyone and everyone was considered "free love" and the thing to do.