DOWNPLAYING ACTIVITIES THAT DICTATE CERTAIN GEOPOLITICAL GOALS
Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
In my recent article "The Iraq War, Oil, and World Government," I quoted from a report produced by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the James Baker III Institute a year before 9/11. Basically, it said that obtaining oil from the Caspian region would be important, but "diplomatic activities that dictated certain geopolitical goals" pertaining to transportation routes would be "downplayed" in this regard.
Since many have wondered what these secretive geopolitical goals were, I thought giving several examples of how the power elite operates in these areas would be instructive. For example, I have previously mentioned a 1952 map developed by the World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government regarding what nations' forces will police what other nations under a world government. This is because a nation's own soldiers would be less willing to crack down on its own population than would foreign troops.
Although economic forces are the driving mechanism the power elite is using to bring about a world government, enforcement of their will is always dependent upon military force or the threat of its use. Relevant to the U.S., if one were looking ahead in 1952, one would try to place permanent military forces as near as possible to both Russia and China, the 2 greatest threats to American interests. Strategically, the placement would be in the Caspian region of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, etc., which is where the 1952 map has U.S. forces policing under a world government. About 10 years ago, the U.S. held military exercises in those areas, then negotiated "short term" military bases there after 9/11, but now these bases are appearing to be "permanent."
While protection of the new Afghan government and of Caspian oil routes against Taliban activities is given as the reason for this permanency, the "downplayed certain geopolitical goal" is the strategic permanent placement of forces between Russia and China.
Similarly concerning Iraq, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) stated as a goal the permanent placement of American military forces in the Gulf region. Various rationales (e.g., Weapons of Mass Destruction, liberating Iraqis from a dictator, etc.) were given for the American invasion of Iraq. However, the allowance of continued chaos in Iraq has enabled the U.S. to persuade the new Iraqi government to permit the large American military bases recently constructed there to become, in effect, permanent. The accomplishment of this "downplayed certain geopolitical goal" places U.S. forces strategically between Syria and Iran to "police" the Middle East region. The Democrat response to the Iraq conflict was reflected by Sen. Carl Levin on FOX News Sunday, April 15, 2007, when he said political progress must be made by the Iraqis, or U.S. troops should start withdrawing. The majority Shiite response to this, though, will probably be that if our troops withdraw, that will just allow the Shiites to do as they please with the Sunnis.
While the American military is the most useful enforcement tool of the power elite at the moment, the eventual world government will have many nations' military forces involved. According to the 1952 map mentioned earlier, not only would U.S. troops also be policing Bosnia (where they went in 1995) under a world government, but Russian forces would be policing the U.S. from about Ft. Riley (KS) to Ft. Polk (LA) eastward to North Carolina. Not coincidentally, former Soviet bloc forces were engaged in joint military exercises in the mid-1990s at Ft. Riley, at Ft. Polk in August 1995, and a Russian police officer also in 1995 helped arrest someone in western North Carolina.
Pertaining to China, the 1952 map has Chinese (Mongolian) forces under a world government policing Mexico, where a Chinese company, Hutchinson-Whampoa, now operates the deep water port of Lazaro Cardenas. This is to facilitate the off-loading of Chinese containers from ships, and then moving the containers (largely uninspected and possibly containing Weapons of Mass Destruction) into the U.S. via the TransTexas Corridor and the TransAmerica Highway. This is occurring under NAFTA and the Security and Prosperity Partnership, which will bring about the North American Community and eventually the North American Union (just like the European Community led to the European Union).
This North American Union (with its new international currency, the Amero) can then be linked with others (e.g., the European Union with its currency, the Euro) to form a World Socialist Government. Most heads of European nations are already vice-presidents of Socialist International.
A World Socialist Government formed from the linkage of regional economic arrangements has been the power elite's ultimate "downplayed certain geopolitical goal," according to Cecil Rhodes' secret Society of the Elect plan. And the various currencies (e.g., Amero, Euro, etc.) will be replaced by one global currency, the Phoenix, by the year A.D. 2018 (see the cover of THE ECONOMIST, January 9, 1988).
Because the military is the key enforcement mechanism concerning Rhodes' and the power elite's plan, personnel becomes critically important. In that regard, when a number of generals criticized President Bush's handling of the Iraq war, they were dismissed or resigned, and the president reached down the ladder of ranking officers on August 1, 2003, to name a new Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Peter Schoomaker.
Why Schoomaker? He was Rhodes scholar Gen. Wesley Clark's assistant at Ft. Hood (TX) when the BATF raid on the Branch Davidian compound occurred. There was an actual mock-up of the compound built at Ft. Hood for training purposes.
After the raid, Schoomaker "met with Gov. Ann Richards on the evening of February 28, 1993, and answered her questions concerning the types of military equipment the BATF had used during the raid and the types of military equipment which federal law enforcement officials might use in the future" (see U.S. House of Representatives Report 104-749, "Investigation into the Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians," August 2,1996). Gen. Schoomaker had also advocated building training links to his Communist Chinese counterparts (see "U.S. Elite Forces Seek PLA Training Links," THE HONG KONG STANDARD, July 18, 1998). Schoomaker and Wesley Clark are just the type of military generals the power elite likes.
Of course, there's always an "incident" (e.g., the alleged sinking of THE MAINE by Spain in 1898), which allows the power elite to place military forces where their world government plan requires. The attack of 9/11 was the incident which allowed U.S. forces to be placed in the Caspian region. Now that American forces are in Iraq strategically between Iran and Syria, "incidents" can occur which will allow the invasion of those nations. Concerning Iran, it could be their involvement in the ongoing sectarian conflict in Iraq or Iran's development of nuclear weapons.
But what about Syria? The "incident" could be a new attack upon Israel by Syrian allies Hamas or Hezbollah, which is also supported by Iran. Or it could be our "discovery" that Syria is where Saddam sent his Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).
We constantly hear that Saddam had no WMD, but that's ridiculous. A U.S. Senate print (staff report of May 25, 1994), "United States Chemical and Biological Warfare-related Dual-use Exports to Iraq and their Possible Impact on the Health Consequences of the Persian Gulf War," indicated that before 1985 (and afterwards), American companies sent government-approved shipments of biological agents to Iraq, including Bacillus anthracis (which produces anthrax) and E.coli. The document also stated that "the United States provided the Government of Iraq with dual-use licensed materials which assisted in the development of Iraqi chemical, biological and missile-systems programs, including...chemical warfare agent production facility plant and technical drawings, chemical filling equipment." So the only question is what did Saddam do with the WMD? It's doubtful Saddam voluntarily destroyed all his WMD, so at the appropriate time according to the power elite, we will "discover" Syria is where they were sent.
"Incidents" do not just occur internationally but also domestically. Another primary goal of the power elite is to disarm the citizenry so that people cannot resist the power elite's enforcement of its plan. Thus, the school shootings of several years ago prompted increased demands for gun control.
The power elite does not have to directly cause the "incident" (e.g., tell a student to shoot others), but rather dialectically creates situations from which "incidents" can occur. For example, I have a page from a DARE program in the Los Angeles schools which shows a boy looking at a gun and he's asked, "What good things can happen by bringing a gun to school?"
And before teenage blacks rioted in Florida in the 1970s, Carnegie-funded Project Read there taught black children in the 1960s how to read the word "porch," for example, by showing them a picture of a black child who would "torch" a "porch." Could this have influenced the 1970s teens? Florida prosecutor (later a judge) Ellen Morphonios said regarding this: "It's like subliminal advertising. If this isn't subversive and deliberately done as part of a master plan...only a sick mind could have produced it."
Similarly, the power elite wants to shape our thinking, especially in terms of values.
Therefore, they didn't direct the recent shooting at Virginia Tech University, but those shootings by a mentally disturbed student will prompt cries for more mental health screenings for all youth as well as others. And those screenings will afford the power elite the opportunity to shape what's considered appropriate mental health.
The Virginia Tech student who killed the others admired the Columbine student killers, calling them martyrs. And all 3 of them took their own lives (suicide). Some years ago, THE WASHINGTON POST reported a dramatic increase in youth suicides, and the POST then published my letter showing how elementary school children recently had been taught the theme song from "M.A.S.H.," which is "Suicide Is Painless." The song explains that the game of life is lost, cheating is the only way to win, and that suicide is painless. Concerning other means of conditioning youth's values, could the abundance of violent videogames also affect children's behavior?
Thus, while it is all right to look at events on the surface level, I always recommend that people not just take incidents at face value, but should also analyze them in terms of how they further the power elite's "downplayed certain geopolitical goal" of a World Socialist Government.
© 2007 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or Truth?"
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.
E-Mail: Not Available
The Virginia Tech student who killed the others admired the Columbine student killers, calling them martyrs. And all 3 of them took their own lives (suicide).