MENTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL
Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
"Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." --David Rockefeller, MEMOIRS, page 405
Concerning mental health, one of the medications prescribed for children has been the SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant Paxil. However, in Evelyn Pringle's "Psych Drugs---Doctors Serve As Middle-Man Pushers" (LAWYERS AND SETTLEMENTS, February 21, 2006), one learns that "GlaxoSmithKline was nailed for fraud in 2004, by New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer, for hiding studies that 'not only failed to show any benefit for the drug in children but demonstrated that children taking Paxil were more likely to become suicidal than those taking a placebo.'...Although Paxil was never approved to treat depression in children, according to Spitzer, in 2002, doctors prescribed the drug off-label to children two million times, the same year that Paxil was Glaxo's top seller, with sales of $3.8 billion."
In addition to SSRIs, I have also mentioned in previous Parts of this series the alleged link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism. Relevant to this is UPI reporter Dan Olmstead's 2-part series "The Age of Autism" (April 18-19, 2005), which he begins by asking "Where are the autistic Amish? Here in Lancaster County, heart of Pennsylvania Dutch country, there should be well over 100 with some form of the disorder. I have come here to find them, but so far my mission has failed, and the very few I have identified raise some interesting questions about some widely held views on autism.
The mainstream scientific consensus says autism is a complex genetic disorder, one that has been around for millennia at roughly the same prevalence. That prevalence is now considered to be 1 in every 166 children born in the United States. Applying that model to Lancaster County, there ought to be 130 Amish men, women and children here with Autism Spectrum Disorder." Olmstead could only find 3 Amish who had autism, and one of those had been adopted from China and had received vaccinations, before which she had been a smiling alert child. The other two children may also have been vaccinated. The Amish have a religious exemption from vaccinations, and in the past, most Amish children have not been vaccinated, though that is now changing.
In terms of social control, whenever someone writes or says there is a power elite conspiring to lead us into a world government, he or she is ridiculed as a "conspiracy theorist" or a "kook" (Rush Limbaugh's term). That is why at the beginning of this Part 27 of my series, I quoted David Rockefeller himself in his own MEMOIRS acknowledging what he has been doing. Note that he used the words "conspiring," "cabal," and "integrated global political structure" (world government). And then he admits that he is "guilty" of pursuing this, and "proud of it."
From 1970 to 1985, David Rockefeller was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and in the TAIPEI TIMES (February 21, 2006), one can read an article, "State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era," by Rhodes scholar Richard Haass, the current president of the CFR. In this article, Haass remarks: "The near monopoly of power once enjoyed by sovereign entities is being eroded. As a result, new mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states....Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function. This is already taking place in the trade realm.
Governments agreed to accept the rulings of the WTO because on balance they benefit from an international trading order even if a particular decision requires that they alter a practice that is their sovereign right to carry out....All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are to cope with globalization....Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary....Necessity may also lead to reducing or even eliminating sovereignty when a government, whether from a lack of capacity or conscious policy, is unable to provide for the basic needs of its citizens....The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy."
Of course, for the power elite to control the population of the world, it will have to be able to know what each of us is doing. Relevant to this, Associated Press reporter Pam Easton on February 16, 2006, wrote an article titled "Police Chief Wants Surveillance Cameras in Houston Apartments," in which she stated that "Houston's police chief proposed Wednesday placing surveillance cameras in apartment complexes, downtown streets, shopping malls, and even private homes as a way of combatting crime with a shortage of police officers. 'I know a lot of people are concerned about Big Brother, but my response to that is if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?' Houston Police Chief Harold Hurtt told reporters Wednesday at a regular briefing."
You may think that Police Chief Hurtt has a point here---if you aren't doing anything illegal, why worry about it? What you need to understand, though, is that the federal government is broadening the definition of what it considers "domestic terrorism." If you look at the recently reauthorized Patriot Act, Section 802 defines "domestic terrorism" to include activities that "involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (and) appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population."
What this can mean is if you are driving over the speed limit (a crime dangerous to human life), you don't even have to intend to make people afraid by speeding! The feds can just say your speeding "appeared" to be intended to cause fear. For what other crimes can one be convicted not by doing something illegal (e.g., commit murder or theft) , or even intending to do something illegal (e.g., attempted murder or theft), but by simply "appearing" to intend to do it?
© 2006 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or Truth?"
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.
E-Mail: Not Available