BACK TO THE 1930s - "PAPIERE, BITTE"
Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
March 24, 2008
As I’ve indicated many times previously, the power elite wants a World Socialist Government, but how will they get the people of the U.S. to accept Socialism? Well, first there will have to be a crisis. For example, today oil and commodity (e.g., corn) prices are skyrocketing (the price of wheat has tripled in the past 10 months). And with increased demand from China, India, etc., global demand will eventually outrun supply. This crisis will lead to calls for “National Planning” similar to that under FDR in the 1930s.
National Planning is a hallmark of Socialism. The British Political Economic Planning (PEP) organization was sponsored by Fabian Socialists, and in the May 3, 1934 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Rep. Louis McFadden quoted PEP member Israel Moses Sief as saying: “Let’s go slowly for a while, until we can see how our plan works out in America.”
Democratic presidential candidate Al Smith had supported FDR for the presidency in 1932. However, on January 25, 1936, Smith delivered a speech stating: “Just get the platform of the Democratic Party, and get the platform of the Socialist Party, and lay them down on your dining room table side by side…. Study the record of the present Administration to date. After you have done that, make your mind up to pick up the platform that more nearly squares with the record, and you will put your hand on the Socialist platform.”
The current situation has arisen because the power elite has created a global economy via globalization. Prior to this, if there was an economic crisis in one country, many other nations would not be affected. As Pat Wood of the AUGUST REVIEW points out, though, for the first time in history all countries’ economies (including stock markets) seem to be rising and falling together. Remember the global impact of the recent mortgage debacle here. It was because banking, investing, lending, etc., are now global.
This is not accidental. It’s part of the power elite’s plan to create a global economic crisis (greatly devalued currencies, stocks, bonds, etc.). A global reduction of credit is leading to a global sale of assets at lower and lower prices, which in turn will affect the global derivatives market, etc. Pat Wood characterizes what’s going to happen as the equivalent of what happened to Enron but on a global scale, and the economies of all the nations of the world will plummet together.
This will result in the world’s population submitting to the power elite’s “International Planning” (for International Socialism) whereby they will manage the world’s (and each nation’s) economy. The political structure they will form to do that will be a World Socialist Government. This will be what David Rockefeller in his MEMOIRS (2002) called “conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will.”
Population control is also an important part of the power elite’s International Planning. In this regard, they consider people no better than animals upon whom to conduct experiments. For example, Eileen Welsome in THE PLUTONIUM FILES: AMERICA’S SECRET MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS IN THE COLD WAR (1999) revealed that 73 disabled children in a Massachusetts schools were spoon-fed oatmeal laced with radioactive isotopes, and 829 pregnant women at a Tennessee clinic were given “vitamin cocktails” containing radioactive iron.
These and other horrible experiments by the U.S. government on unknowing and unwilling Americans occurred over a 30-year period. Also during this time, Frederick Jaffe (vice-president of Planned Parenthood-World Population) wrote a memo to Bernard Berelson (president of the Population Council, founded in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III) on March 11, 1969 including “Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact.” Among the examples listed was “fertility control agents in water supply,” and in early March 2008 news reports indicated that estrogen (which effects fertility) among other chemicals had been released into the water supplies of 41 million Americans.
In order to control populations, the power elite obviously has to be able to track them. This will be reminiscent of the 1930s in which the Nazis would request I.D. by saying, “Papiere, bitte” (Papers, please) of those under its control. Everyone also had an Arbeitsbuch containing her or his personal demographic, educational, occupational, etc. information. Today in Communist China, a similar document is the “Dangan.” And by 2017 A.D., all British citizens will have a National I.D. card by.
In the U.S., Arbeitsbuch-type information started to become available about 10 years ago via ALMIS (America’s Labor Market Information System), which was developed by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The data tables in ALMIS contain information about employment, occupation projections, wages, layoffs, employers, educational programs, completers (of educational programs), population demographics (e.g., who is located where), and selected economic indicators.
Relevant to a national I.D. in the U.S., on January 11, 2008 Michael Chertoff (head of Homeland Security) in a press statement said regarding the “Real I.D. Act” passed by Congress: “There comes a point in time where all the discussion and analysis has to stop…. The time has come to bite the bullet…. Now if a particular state were to say, ‘We opt out: we’re not going to participate at all,’ then the law is very clear: after May of this year, that state’s driver’s licenses will no longer be acceptable as a form of federal identification for getting on an airplane or getting into a federal building….”
The federal government plans to use these “machine-readable” state driver’s licenses, with “uniformity” among the states, as federally-approved I.D. cards. This will be followed by future federal demands upon the public, and down the road if the people at some point refuse to bow to these demands, they could be forced into submission by varying means. Foreigners in our police forces might be used (the Associated Press on May 16, 2007 reported that “the Santa Fe police department is considering the possibility of recruiting Mexican nationals to fill vacant police jobs”). Or the U.S. military could be used (such forces were used at Waco against the Branch Davidians). Or foreigners in our military could be used (THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR on December 26, 2006 published “U.S. Military May Recruit Foreigners to Serve” by Tom Regan). Or foreign troops could be used (USNORTHCOM reported that on February 14, U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart signed an agreement with Canadian Air Force Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais allowing US and Canadian troops to cross each other’s borders during civil emergencies note that “civil” can mean an action by the American people and not just in response to an attack from abroad). Or people could be labeled “domestic terrorists” simply by appearing to intend to influence a politician’s pro-abortion policy, for example, by saying they won’t vote for her or him (Section 802 of the Patriot Act states that the “term ‘domestic terrorism’ means activities that appear to be intended to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion”). Note that one doesn’t have to “intend to influence,” but only “appear” that way to be considered a “domestic terrorist.”
Or the President could simply label and imprison a person as an “enemy combatant” whereby they no longer have any Constitutional rights. Regarding this last possibility, it’s worth remembering that Winston Churchill on November 21, 1943 warned: “The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian governments whether Nazi or Communist.”
Regarding all of the aforementioned possibilities, why do you think the Federal government has signed contracts amounting to $385 million with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root to build vast new detention camps across the U.S.? Both Democrats and Republicans repeatedly have said they don’t plan to round up all the illegal aliens in the U.S., so for whom do you think these massive new detention camps are being build? It’s not just for a few foreign terrorists, so that only leaves “domestic terrorists” however the power elite’s political puppets are ordered to define that term. That could mean YOU! And note that the first of these single bid contracts to a Halliburton (Vice-President Cheney’s former company) subsidiary was signed in 1999 under the Clinton administration. The power elite controls both Democrat and Republican leaders.
The ability of the power elite to enforce its will, of course, reaches far beyond the borders of the U.S. As an example of this, the assassinated Benazir Bhutto’s father, Zulfiker Ali Bhutto, when prime minister of Pakistan wrote IF I AM ASSASSINATED (1979). On page xxvii in the Introduction to this book, one reads regarding his pursuit of a nuclear weapons program that the outgoing American ambassador in Islamabad, Pakistan said “if he (Bhutto) did not back down, he would no longer stay in power.” This was confirmed by Tariq Ali (who personally knew Bhutto) in his THE CLASH OF FUNDAMENTALISM (2002) on page 167, where the author write that Secretary of State Henry Kissinger visited Bhutto in Lahore, Pakistan in 1976 and said “We can de-stablize your government and make a horrible example out of you” if Bhutto continued Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program. Tariq Ali then notes that Bhutto continued his program and six months later was driven from office.
Today, Kissinger supports Senator McCain for president, and his fellow power elite agent Zbigniew Brzezinski supports Senator Obama. Senator Clinton, of course, is part of the whole Rhodes scholar globalist network. But how does the power elite keep the electorate from learning what Clinton, Obama or McCain (each of whom has at least 5 prominent CFR advisors) will actually do if elected? It’s actually very simple keep news reporters and the public focused on his or her supporters saying something controversial (e.g., the comments of Geraldine Ferraro, Rev. Wright, and the talk-show host in Ohio). As long as reporters cover primarily this, voters will not learn what the candidates’ specific positions are on the issues. For example, do we know anything besides the candidates’ general policy proposals on the economy, Iraq, education, etc.? No. News reporters haven’t pressed for in-depth details regarding any issue. Thus, the power elite’s plan is working.
What will likely happen in the area of education, for example, if a Democrat is elected President are more decisions like that of February 28, 2008 by Appeals Court Judge H. Walter Croskey in Los Angeles. He ruled that parents have no Constitutional right to homeschool their children, and that students must be taught only by credentialed teachers. Judge Croskey’s ruling looks very much like the National Education Association’s B-75 Home Schooling resolution at its 2007 convention. Since homeschooled students typically have higher academic achievement test scores than public school students, this issue is really about separating students from their parents’ values. Former NEA president Catherine Barrett admitted as much in the SATURDAY REVIEW OF EDUCATION (Feb. 10, 1973) when she said teaching “basic skills” would be reduced to only one-quarter of the school day, as “the teacher will be a conveyor of values, a philosopher…. We will be agents of change.”
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
At the international level, CFR member Carol Bellamy, after being with Morgan-Stanley and managing director of Bear-Stearns (recently sold because of great financial trouble), became executive director of UNICEF where she declared: “The U.N. position is… if formal education is not supplied by government, a child’s right to schooling is violated. Home schools are not a substitute for formal education.” (Bloomsburg, PA PRESS-ENTERPRISE, May 15, 1998). The power elite at the global level wants to eliminate homeschooling, and efforts toward that end have already begun in Germany and other nations. The power elite simply cannot allow parents (usually with traditional values of morality and patriotism) to impart their values to their children. Only the public schools can indoctrinate children with globalism and moral relativism, which are necessary to condition the masses to accept a non-biblical World Socialist Government.
© 2008 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved