WAR FOR PERPETUAL EVOLUTION
"A democracy which makes or even effectively prepares for modern, scientific war must necessarily cease to be democratic. No country can be really well prepared for modern war unless it is governed by a tyrant, at the head of a highly trained and perfectly obedient bureaucracy." - Aldous Huxley
The Alchemy of Warfare
As I have established in previous articles, Darwinism was but one more permutation of an ancient occult doctrine of transformism. This occult belief originated in Mesopotamia roughly 6000 years ago and was actively promulgated by the various Mystery cults. It also comprises the ruling class religion of today. At the heart of the doctrine is the claim that man is gradually evolving towards apotheosis. Throughout the years, the religion of apotheosized man has recycled itself under numerous appellations. Darwinism was but one more installment in this seamless ideational continuum. In this series, I am going to examine one of the chief facilitators of man�s purported evolution: war.
In his book Evolution and Ethics, Darwinian Sir Arthur Keith wrote:
Thus, Keith established the centrality of war to evolutionary development. Jacques Barzun eloquently reiterates this contention:
Indeed, Darwinism totally altered political science. Now questions of governance and the administration of human affairs assumed an evolutionary framework. The ruling class has a stake in engineering global conflicts. Not only do wars cull �surplus populations,� thus satisfying the Malthusian precepts of Darwinism, but also they tangibly enact the dialectical framework intrinsic to evolutionary theory. This framework is Hegelian. The organism (thesis) comes into conflict with nature (antithesis) resulting in a newly enhanced species (synthesis), the culmination of the evolutionary process (Marrs 127). It is the hope of the elite that, through the continuous promulgation of warfare, this harmonious synthesis shall be tangibly realized. In this context, war serves an alchemical function.
Over the years, the various scientific dictatorships of the world have assumed convergent trajectories. While making war with one another, these scientific dictatorships simultaneously synthesize and birth new authoritarian regimes. Why? In reality, these scientific dictatorships have been little more than variants of the same socialist totalitarian system. Thus, the ostensible conflicts among these competing socialist regimes actually represent incremental phases in a process of coalitional integration. The final Hegelian synthesis is intended to be a global scientific dictatorship.
War is integral to the elite�s evolutionary script, facilitating the dialectical convergence of the many scientific dictatorships littering the globe. The Hegelian synthesis of the world�s various scientific dictatorships into a global government stipulates continual war. In turn, such perpetual conflict requires the manufacturing of adversaries to engage in fraudulent skirmishes. In short, war is alchemy. By synthesizing metallurgy, physics, occultism, and several other fields of study, the alchemists hoped to ultimately achieve the transmutation of man himself. Today, the power elite strives towards the same end, but through the synthesizing of global powers instead. War is one of the chief means by which this synthesis is achieved.
The Report from Iron Mountain
The plans for perpetual warfare were most thoroughly delineated within The Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace. Released in 1966, this document purported to be the product of a Special Study Group of fifteen men whose identities were to remain secret. For several years, the authenticity of the report has been in question. This skepticism only intensified when the document�s author publicly declared that the report was a �satire.� However, other parties with substantial credibility have defended the authenticity of The Report from Iron Mountain. For instance, Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty, who acted as an advisor to President Kennedy, stated:
The Report from Iron Mountain became a proverbial hot potato and changed hands several times. Its authorship was even attributed to William F. Buckley, a veritable icon among neoconservatives. Irrespective of who authored the document, its precise delineation of ruling class tactics and its accuracy in prognosticating future events is difficult to deny.
Questions of morality and individual freedom were not addressed in The Report from Iron Mountain. In fact, the report only briefly mentions the concepts of human liberty and ethics, regarding them as anachronistic concepts embraced by bygone generations. The study concerned itself solely with the perpetuation of an absolute State and an elitist power structure. The report stated:
Evident in this statement is the power elite�s fanatically religious adherence to the doctrine of scientism. The doctrine of scientism rigorously promotes the ecumenical imposition of physical science upon all fields of inquiry. Researcher Michael Hoffman most succinctly revealed the inherent folly of scientism:
The dominant epistemological paradigm of today is one governed by scientific determinism. Now, institutionally accredited science is the infallible dogma of a new theocracy. Human beings are reduced to quantifiable entities for the scrutiny of priests donning lab coats. Atop the highest plateau of this epistemological hierarchy sits the power elite, whose scientism selectively excludes any data that could be disproportionate with the ultimate agenda: complete social control. According to The Report from Iron Mountain, �the desirability of peace, the importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest �good� for the greatest number, the �dignity� of the individual, and other such wishful premises� are disproportionate with the �yardstick� of physical science. Since science �ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetic and moral judgments,� there is no place for �axiomatic values� in a global scientific dictatorship.
The document proceeds to examine the necessity of war, declaring:
With the ever-present threat of war, the absolute State could maintain a standing army and implement a policy of compulsory service for its citizenry. According to the study, this system of obligatory service would provide the socially maladjusted and economically disadvantaged elements of society with a function. Thus, these �potential enemies of society� could be placated and pacified. The report elaborates:
Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery� It is entirely possible that the development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace. As a practical matter, conversion of the code of military discipline to a euphemized form of slavery would entail surprisingly little revision; the logical first step would be the adoption of some form of �universal� military service. (Lewin 41-42, 68, 70)
It is interesting to examine the new definition of peace presented in The Report from Iron Mountain. It reads: �The word peace, as we have used it in the following pages� implies total and general disarmament� (Lewin 9). Under such conditions, resistance against tyranny is virtually non-existent. With the exception of combatants, whose behavior will be closely monitored by their superiors in the military and whose dominant concern shall be survival on the battlefields of the elite�s perpetual war, no one else shall have the weapons with which they could resist tyranny. Indeed, �war is peace.� The �peace� afforded for the New World Order at the expense of others shall mean perpetual �war� for the rest of humanity.
Sci-fi Predictive Programming for Future Conflict
This state of affairs mirrors George Orwell�s famous �science fiction� roman a� clef, 1984. In this literary classic, Orwell presented a world order where the chief element of societal stability was war. The �machine,� which represented a nation�s technical and industrial infrastructure, had been transmogrified into a strategic weapon against its own population. Shamefully wasteful governmental programs were enacted to keep the citizenry perpetually impoverished. This Hobbesian war of �all against all� was perpetuated by a small elite for the purposes of maintaining their power.
Yet, is such a world confined to the pages of �science fiction.� Hardly. In fact, they provide the very inspiration for The Report from Iron Mountain. The Iron Mountain cabal confessed this much, stating that:
That which the Iron Mountain cabal euphemistically refers to as an �imaginative anticipation of the sociology of the future� was actually predictive programming. Hoffman elaborates: �Predictive programming works by means of the propagation of the illusion of an infallibly accurate vision of how the world is going to look in the future� (Hoffman 205). Also dubbed �sci-fi inevitabilism� by Hoffman, predictive programming is analogous to a virus that infects its hosts with the false belief that it is:
Such an ideational contagion may have already been injected into America�s collective conscious before the staggering events of September 11, 2001. For instance, intimations of psychological conditioning emerge in the 1997 film Starship Troopers. Based on the sci-fi novel by Robert Heinlein, Starship Troopers is one more self-fulfilling prophecy promulgated through popular culture. It heralds the erection of a national security state, the very existence of which is dependent upon the existence of an enemy from �beyond.� Synopsizing the theme of the film, literary critic Geoffrey Whitehall makes an interesting observation:
It is very interesting that, the very same year of Starship Troopers� release, former national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski published The Grand Chessboard. In this overtly imperialistic tract, Brzezinski wrote:
A �truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat� did appear. His name was Osama bin Laden. Is this a mere coincidence or is it more sci-fi predictive programming? Starship Troopers was premised upon the same thesis that would underpin American foreign policy four years later� consensus facilitated by an external threat. That both a textbook in geopolitics and a pop culture film presented a common catalyst for socio-political change is highly suspicious to say the least. One thing is certain� an ideational contagion had been unleashed and, four years later, would become painfully evident in the public�s acceptance of the draconian Patriot Act.
On the August 3, 2003 edition of NBC�s Meet the Press, secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge made the following statement: ��the President intuitively realized we are at war. It is a permanent condition. That�s why they made permanent changes in the government. That�s why we have a Department of Homeland Security� (emphasis added). In the words of evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith, war is the progeny of evolution. International terrorism has conveniently provided the hidden alchemists with a war. In hopes of fulfilling their occult Darwinian doctrine, the elite intend this war to last for a very long time. After all, war is evolution.
In future installments in this series, I will examine consciously engineered wars throughout history and attempt to reveal their role in the elite�s alchemical agenda for humanity.
Barzun, Jacques. Darwin, Marx, and Wagner. Boston: Little, Brown and
� 2005 Phillip D. Collins
- All Rights Reserved
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Author Phillip D. Collins acted as the editor for The Hidden Face of Terrorism. He has also written articles for Paranoia Magazine, MKzine, NewsWithViews.com, and B.I.P.E.D.: The Official Website of Darwinian Dissent and Conspiracy Archive. He has an Associate of Arts and Science.
Currently, he is studying for a bachelor's degree in Communications at Wright State University. During the course of his seven-year college career, Phillip has studied philosophy, religion, and classic literature. He also co-authored the book, The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship: An Examination of Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st Century, which is available at: [Link]